Hart Rowan, Moran Nancy A, Ochman Howard
Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Mar 11;122(10):e2319389122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319389122. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
Nucleotide sequence data are being harnessed to identify species, even in cases in which organisms themselves are neither in hand nor witnessed. But how genome-wide sequence divergence maps to species status is far from clear. While gene sequence divergence is commonly used to delineate bacterial species, its correspondence to established species boundaries has yet to be explored across eukaryotic taxa. Because the processes underlying gene flow differ fundamentally between prokaryotes and eukaryotes, these domains are likely to differ in the relationship between reproductive isolation and genome-wide sequence divergence. In prokaryotes, homologous recombination, the basis of gene flow, depends directly on the degree of genomic sequence divergence, whereas in sexually reproducing eukaryotes, reproductive incompatibility can stem from changes in very few genes. Guided by measures of genome-wide sequence divergence in bacteria, we gauge how genomic criteria correspond to species boundaries in eukaryotes. In recognized species of eukaryotes, levels of gene sequence divergence within species are typically very small, averaging <1% across protein-coding regions in most animals, plants, and fungi. There are even instances in which divergence between sister species is the same or less than that among conspecifics. In contrast, bacterial species, defined as populations exchanging homologous genes, show levels of divergence both within and between species that are considerably higher. Although no single threshold delineates species, eukaryotic populations with >1% genome-wide sequence divergence are likely separate species, whereas prokaryotic populations with 1% divergence are still able to recombine and thus can be considered the same species.
核苷酸序列数据正被用于识别物种,即使在既没有获得生物体本身也没有目睹其存在的情况下。但是,全基因组序列差异如何映射到物种状态仍远不清楚。虽然基因序列差异通常用于划分细菌物种,但在整个真核生物分类群中,其与既定物种边界的对应关系尚未得到探索。由于原核生物和真核生物中基因流动的潜在过程存在根本差异,这些领域在生殖隔离和全基因组序列差异之间的关系可能有所不同。在原核生物中,作为基因流动基础的同源重组直接取决于基因组序列差异的程度,而在有性繁殖的真核生物中,生殖不相容性可能源于极少数基因的变化。以细菌全基因组序列差异的测量为指导,我们评估基因组标准如何对应于真核生物中的物种边界。在已识别的真核生物物种中,物种内的基因序列差异水平通常非常小,在大多数动物、植物和真菌的蛋白质编码区域中平均<1%。甚至存在姐妹物种之间的差异与同种个体之间的差异相同或更小的情况。相比之下,被定义为交换同源基因的群体的细菌物种,其物种内和物种间的差异水平要高得多。虽然没有单一的阈值来划分物种,但全基因组序列差异>1%的真核生物群体可能是不同的物种,而差异为1%的原核生物群体仍能够重组,因此可以被认为是同一物种。