Dobroniak Corinna Carla, Lesche Valeska, Olgemöller Ulrike, Beck Paula, Lehmann Wolfgang, Spering Christopher
Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Feb 28;51(1):122. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02799-6.
In mechanically cardiopulmonary resuscitated (CPR) patients, chest compressions at the level of the 3rd to 5th rib on the sternum result in reproducibly similar injury patterns: parasternal osteochondral dissociation (OCS) on both sides in combination with a sternal fracture with or without an additional serial rib fracture in the anterolateral column (ALS). This injury biomechanically impairs physiological breathing, resulting in an inverse breathing pattern. Trauma patients, on the other hand, often show a mixed pattern depending on the location of the main energy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the surgical technique of chest wall reconstruction (CWR) using transsternal refixation of the 5th rib on both sides in combination with plate osteosynthesis of the sternum and to analyze its success in comparison to the surgical strategy of CWR in the context of a traumatic genesis.
Data acquisition was performed using medical records of a Level I Trauma Centre in Germany and compare patients with radiologically or clinically diagnosed flail chest as a result of cardiopulmonary mechanical resuscitation (CPR). The retrospective study included patients in the period 2018-2023 after surgical CWR. The patients were either post-CPR (n = 29; CPR) or trauma patients (n = 36; trauma). The collective was described and analyzed using the digital patient file, as well as data on ICU stay and duration of ventilation or conversion to assisted ventilation modes, reason for chest wall instability, time of surgery, length of stay and mortality. As a long-term follow-up, body plethysmography was analyzed comparatively. Primary endpoints were mean length of stay in ICU, time to surgery, ventilator dependency and mortality rate. Secondary endpoints were time to transfer to rehabilitation, ventilation disorders and long term outcome.
In the period 65 patients (48 m, 17w) were included, 29 of whom had been mechanically resuscitated (CPR), 36 formed to post-traumatic cohort (trauma). The CPR were significantly older (69 vs. 58 years; p-value 0.003). The duration from CPR to surgery was on average significantly longer than trauma to surgery (16.76 vs. 4.11 days). The mean length of stay in ICU were 30 days (trauma) and 45 days for CPR (significantly longer, p-value 0.0008). The mean duration of ventilation was 188 h for trauma and 593 h for CPR. Extubation or conversion to assisted, relevant de-escalating ventilation modes was possible in both groups after a mean of 38 h post-OP. Among the CPR patients, 4 died in hospital (hospital mortality: CPR 20.7% vs. trauma 5.6%), 7 (30%) were transferred to an early clinical rehabilitation and 10 were discharged to home or follow-up treatment. In the case of trauma, 5 (14.7%) were transferred to an early clinical rehabilitation and 20 were discharged to home or follow-up treatment. Bodyplethysmography 6 months after CPR / trauma showed no differences in both collectives with regard to ventilation disorders. Diffusion was prolonged in both groups, presumably due to the healing process of lungs contusion. Both showed no restriction disorders.
Chest wall reconstruction, including plate osteosynthesis of the sternum in combination with transsternal fixation of the 5th rib on both sides can largely restore physiological respiratory mechanics immediately after surgery and accelerate the weaning success. In the management of patients after CPR, the initial diagnosis which had indicated resuscitation, is the main focus and can often be an obstacle to extubation. Nevertheless, independent breathing can be accelerated by restoring the biomechanics through early surgical treatment using CWR and saves long-term ICU stays with the potential for further complication and resource consumption. CWR forms the essential basis for early rehabilitation of the underlying cause of resuscitation. Ventilation disorders do not occur after surgical CWR, even during the course of the procedure.
在机械心肺复苏(CPR)患者中,在胸骨第3至5肋水平进行胸外按压会导致可重复出现的相似损伤模式:双侧胸骨旁骨软骨分离(OCS),并伴有胸骨骨折,伴或不伴有前外侧柱(ALS)的连续性肋骨骨折。这种损伤在生物力学上会损害生理呼吸,导致反向呼吸模式。另一方面,创伤患者通常会根据主要能量的位置表现出混合模式。本研究的目的是评估双侧第5肋经胸骨重新固定联合胸骨钢板内固定的胸壁重建(CWR)手术技术,并与创伤性病因背景下的CWR手术策略相比分析其成功率。
使用德国一家一级创伤中心的病历进行数据采集,并比较因心肺机械复苏(CPR)导致的影像学或临床诊断为连枷胸的患者。这项回顾性研究纳入了2018年至2023年接受CWR手术的患者。患者分为CPR后患者(n = 29;CPR组)或创伤患者(n = 36;创伤组)。使用数字患者档案以及重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、通气持续时间或转换为辅助通气模式的数据、胸壁不稳定的原因、手术时间、住院时间和死亡率来描述和分析该队列。作为长期随访,对体容积描记法进行了比较分析。主要终点是ICU平均住院时间、手术时间、呼吸机依赖和死亡率。次要终点是转至康复治疗的时间、通气障碍和长期结果。
在该时间段内纳入了65例患者(48例男性,17例女性),其中29例接受了机械复苏(CPR组),36例构成创伤后队列(创伤组)。CPR组患者年龄显著更大(69岁对58岁;p值0.003)。从CPR到手术的时间平均显著长于从创伤到手术的时间(16.76天对4.11天)。ICU平均住院时间创伤组为30天,CPR组为45天(显著更长,p值0.0008)。创伤组平均通气持续时间为188小时,CPR组为593小时。两组在术后平均38小时后均有可能拔管或转换为辅助的、相关的降级通气模式。在CPR组患者中,4例在医院死亡(医院死亡率:CPR组20.7%对创伤组5.6%),7例(30%)转至早期临床康复,10例出院回家或接受后续治疗。在创伤组中,5例(14.7%)转至早期临床康复,20例出院回家或接受后续治疗。CPR/创伤后6个月的体容积描记法显示两组在通气障碍方面无差异。两组的弥散均延长,可能是由于肺挫伤的愈合过程。两组均未显示受限障碍。
胸壁重建,包括胸骨钢板内固定联合双侧第5肋经胸骨固定,术后可在很大程度上立即恢复生理呼吸力学并加速脱机成功。在CPR后患者的管理中,最初表明复苏的诊断是主要关注点,且常常是拔管的障碍。然而,通过使用CWR的早期手术治疗恢复生物力学可加速自主呼吸,并避免长期入住ICU以及可能出现的进一步并发症和资源消耗。CWR是复苏潜在病因早期康复的重要基础。手术CWR后不会出现通气障碍,即使在手术过程中也是如此。