• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植物-传粉者性状匹配影响澳大利亚吸蜜鸟(雀形目,吸蜜鸟科)的花粉传播,但不影响其取食效率。

Plant-pollinator trait matching affects pollen transfer but not feeding efficiency of Australian honeyeaters (Aves, Meliphagidae).

作者信息

Hewes Amanda E, McWhorter Todd J, Rico-Guevara Alejandro

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Commun Biol. 2025 Mar 1;8(1):339. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07693-w.

DOI:10.1038/s42003-025-07693-w
PMID:40021772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11871056/
Abstract

Animal pollination is common among flowering plants. Increased morphological matching between floral and pollinator traits is thought to increase pollen transfer and feeding efficiency, but we lack studies that empirically demonstrate this. Working with Australian honeyeaters, we find that there is positive correlation between bill-corolla matching and pollen deposition at flowers, but no correlation with how efficiently birds can extract floral nectar. The species with the lowest bill-corolla matching deposited the fewest pollen grains but had the highest feeding efficiency, showing that bill-corolla matching expectations were met on the plant side of this interaction but not on the pollinator side. Finally, we find different interspecific patterns of pollen deposition at the scales of a single flower visit versus the landscape, due to differences in patterns of plant visitation. This work illustrates the need for more studies that directly correlate trait matching to fitness proxies of plants and avian pollinators.

摘要

动物传粉在开花植物中很常见。人们认为,花部与传粉者特征之间形态匹配度的提高会增加花粉传递和取食效率,但我们缺乏实证研究来证明这一点。通过对澳大利亚食蜜鸟的研究,我们发现喙与花冠的匹配度与花朵上的花粉沉积呈正相关,但与鸟类提取花蜜的效率无关。喙与花冠匹配度最低的物种沉积的花粉粒最少,但取食效率最高,这表明在这种相互作用中,从植物角度来看,符合喙与花冠匹配的预期,但从传粉者角度来看并非如此。最后,由于植物访花模式的差异,我们发现在单次花朵访问和景观尺度上,花粉沉积存在不同的种间模式。这项研究表明,需要开展更多将特征匹配与植物和鸟类传粉者的适合度指标直接关联起来的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11d/11871056/29930656b018/42003_2025_7693_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11d/11871056/cb2995850c14/42003_2025_7693_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11d/11871056/00f96899ed52/42003_2025_7693_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11d/11871056/19c31aa9e226/42003_2025_7693_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11d/11871056/020b1bdd7d36/42003_2025_7693_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11d/11871056/1330e2e31cc5/42003_2025_7693_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11d/11871056/29930656b018/42003_2025_7693_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11d/11871056/cb2995850c14/42003_2025_7693_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11d/11871056/00f96899ed52/42003_2025_7693_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11d/11871056/19c31aa9e226/42003_2025_7693_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11d/11871056/020b1bdd7d36/42003_2025_7693_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11d/11871056/1330e2e31cc5/42003_2025_7693_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11d/11871056/29930656b018/42003_2025_7693_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Plant-pollinator trait matching affects pollen transfer but not feeding efficiency of Australian honeyeaters (Aves, Meliphagidae).植物-传粉者性状匹配影响澳大利亚吸蜜鸟(雀形目,吸蜜鸟科)的花粉传播,但不影响其取食效率。
Commun Biol. 2025 Mar 1;8(1):339. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07693-w.
2
The evolution of flower-pollinator trait matching, and why do some alpine gingers appear to be mismatched?花-传粉者特征匹配的进化,以及为什么有些高山姜似乎不匹配?
Ann Bot. 2023 Dec 5;132(6):1073-1088. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad141.
3
Bene"fit" Assessment in Pollination Coevolution: Mechanistic Perspectives on Hummingbird Bill-Flower Matching.授粉协同进化中的利益评估:蜂鸟喙-花匹配的机制观点。
Integr Comp Biol. 2021 Sep 8;61(2):681-695. doi: 10.1093/icb/icab111.
4
Genotypic variation in blueberry flower morphology and nectar reward content affects pollinator attraction in a diverse breeding population.蓝莓花形态和花蜜奖赏成分的基因型变异影响多样化繁殖群体中传粉者的吸引力。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):814. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05495-6.
5
Unexpectedly low paternal diversity is associated with infrequent pollinator visitation for a bird-pollinated plant.出乎意料的是,亲代多样性低与鸟类传粉植物的传粉者访问频率低有关。
Oecologia. 2021 Aug;196(4):937-950. doi: 10.1007/s00442-021-04906-x. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
6
Floral trait dissimilarity indirectly decreases heterospecific pollen transfer through pollinator sharing in a subalpine meadow.在一个亚高山草甸中,花部性状差异通过传粉者共享间接减少了异源花粉传播。
Oecologia. 2025 Mar 21;207(4):55. doi: 10.1007/s00442-025-05694-4.
7
Ornithophily for the nonspecialist: Differential pollination efficiency of the Macaronesian island paleoendemic Navaea phoenicea (Malvaceae) by generalist passerines.非专业人士的鸟类传粉:通用雀形目 passerines 对马卡罗内西亚岛古特有种 Navaea phoenicea(锦葵科)的传粉效率差异。
Am J Bot. 2017 Oct;104(10):1556-1568. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1700204.
8
Pollinator specialization and pollination syndromes of three related North American Silene.三种北美相关蝇子草属植物的传粉者专一性与传粉综合征
Ecology. 2009 Aug;90(8):2077-87. doi: 10.1890/08-1141.1.
9
Floral function: effects of traits on pollinators, male and female pollination success, and female fitness across three species of milkweeds (Asclepias).花的功能:性状对传粉者的影响、雌雄两性的授粉成功率以及三种马利筋属植物(马利筋)的雌性适合度
Am J Bot. 2017 Jan;104(1):150-160. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600328. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
10
ATLANTIC POLLINATION: a data set of flowers and interaction with nectar-feeding vertebrates from the Atlantic Forest.大西洋传粉:来自大西洋森林的花朵数据集以及与食蜜脊椎动物的相互作用。
Ecology. 2022 Feb;103(2):e03595. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3595. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Species morphology better predicts plant-hummingbird interactions across elevations than nectar traits.物种形态比花蜜特征更能预测不同海拔高度的植物-蜂鸟相互作用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Sep;291(2031):20241279. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1279. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Macroevolution of the plant-hummingbird pollination system.植物-蜂鸟传粉系统的宏观进化。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024 Oct;99(5):1831-1847. doi: 10.1111/brv.13094. Epub 2024 May 5.
3
Components of local adaptation and divergence in pollination efficacy in a coevolving species interaction.
在协同进化的物种相互作用中,传粉功效的局部适应和分化的组成部分。
Ecology. 2023 Jun;104(6):e4043. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4043. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
4
The evolution, ecology, and conservation of hummingbirds and their interactions with flowering plants.蜂鸟的进化、生态、保护以及它们与开花植物的相互作用。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Jun;97(3):923-959. doi: 10.1111/brv.12828. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
5
Pollinator Community Predicts Trait Matching between Oil-Producing Flowers and a Guild of Oil-Collecting Bees.传粉媒介群落预测产油花与采油蜂类群之间的性状匹配。
Am Nat. 2021 Dec;198(6):750-758. doi: 10.1086/717050. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
6
Bene"fit" Assessment in Pollination Coevolution: Mechanistic Perspectives on Hummingbird Bill-Flower Matching.授粉协同进化中的利益评估:蜂鸟喙-花匹配的机制观点。
Integr Comp Biol. 2021 Sep 8;61(2):681-695. doi: 10.1093/icb/icab111.
7
The least effective pollinator principle: specialized morphology despite generalized ecology.最无效授粉原则:尽管具有广义生态,但形态特化。
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2020 Sep;22(5):924-931. doi: 10.1111/plb.13145. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
8
Trait matching and phenological overlap increase the spatio-temporal stability and functionality of plant-pollinator interactions.特征匹配和物候重叠增加了植物-传粉者相互作用的时空稳定性和功能。
Ecol Lett. 2020 Jul;23(7):1107-1116. doi: 10.1111/ele.13510. Epub 2020 May 17.
9
Ecological mechanisms explaining interactions within plant-hummingbird networks: morphological matching increases towards lower latitudes.生态机制解释植物-蜂鸟网络内的相互作用:形态匹配随着纬度的降低而增加。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 11;287(1922):20192873. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2873.
10
Ecological fitting is a sufficient driver of tight interactions between sunbirds and ornithophilous plants.生态拟合是太阳鸟与喜食花蜜植物之间紧密相互作用的一个充分驱动因素。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Feb 5;10(4):1784-1793. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5942. eCollection 2020 Feb.