Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 11;287(1922):20192873. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2873.
Interactions between species are influenced by different ecological mechanisms, such as morphological matching, phenological overlap and species abundances. How these mechanisms explain interaction frequencies across environmental gradients remains poorly understood. Consequently, we also know little about the mechanisms that drive the geographical patterns in network structure, such as complementary specialization and modularity. Here, we use data on morphologies, phenologies and abundances to explain interaction frequencies between hummingbirds and plants at a large geographical scale. For 24 quantitative networks sampled throughout the Americas, we found that the tendency of species to interact with morphologically matching partners contributed to specialized and modular network structures. Morphological matching best explained interaction frequencies in networks found closer to the equator and in areas with low-temperature seasonality. When comparing the three ecological mechanisms within networks, we found that both morphological matching and phenological overlap generally outperformed abundances in the explanation of interaction frequencies. Together, these findings provide insights into the ecological mechanisms that underlie geographical patterns in resource specialization. Notably, our results highlight morphological constraints on interactions as a potential explanation for increasing resource specialization towards lower latitudes.
物种间的相互作用受不同的生态机制影响,例如形态匹配、物候重叠和物种丰度。这些机制如何解释跨环境梯度的相互作用频率仍知之甚少。因此,我们对驱动网络结构地理格局的机制也知之甚少,例如互补专业化和模块性。在这里,我们使用形态学、物候学和丰度的数据来解释在大地理尺度上蜂鸟和植物之间的相互作用频率。对于在整个美洲采样的 24 个定量网络,我们发现物种与形态匹配的伙伴相互作用的趋势有助于形成专业化和模块化的网络结构。形态匹配最能解释靠近赤道和温度季节性较低地区的网络中的相互作用频率。在网络内比较这三种生态机制时,我们发现形态匹配和物候重叠通常比丰度更能解释相互作用频率。总的来说,这些发现为资源专业化的地理格局背后的生态机制提供了深入了解。值得注意的是,我们的结果强调了形态对相互作用的限制,这可能是资源专业化随纬度降低而增加的一个解释。