• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期宫颈癌不同手术方式的预后及相关影响因素分析

Analysis of prognosis and related influencing factors of different surgical approaches for early cervical cancer.

作者信息

Ou Lingling, He Lulu, Bu Qiaowen, Wu Hengying, Wen Bin, Luo Xiping, Hong Xiaoshan

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.

Jiangmen People's Hospita, Jiangmen, China.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar 1;151(3):97. doi: 10.1007/s00432-025-06139-4.

DOI:10.1007/s00432-025-06139-4
PMID:40024930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11872751/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 5-year survival rates of patients with early cervical cancer (CC) under different surgical approaches and to analyze the factors affecting the prognosis of these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis and follow-up study were conducted on patients who underwent surgical treatment for early CC at Guangdong Women and Children Hospital between January 2005 and December 2017. Prognostic factors were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 726 patients were included, with 347 in the open surgery group and 379 in the laparoscopy group. The proportion of deep stromal infiltration in the open group was significantly higher than in the laparoscopy group (228/347 vs. 194/379, respectively; P < 0.05). Similarly, the tumor diameter (< 4 cm) was significantly larger in the open group compared to the laparoscopy group (51/347 vs. 26/379, respectively; P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the number of pregnancies, number of deliveries, menopause, contraceptive methods, high-risk HPV infection, clinical stage, pathological type, degree of differentiation, parametrial invasion, or lymph node metastasis (P > 0.05). The mean follow-up period was 53.15 ± 15.33 months. The overall 5-year survival rate (OS) for all patients was 89.0%, while the disease-free survival rate (DFS) was 86.8%. The 5-year OS rates in the open and laparoscopy groups were 87.2% and 90.4%, respectively, while the 5-year DFS rates were 84.6% and 88.6%, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that clinical stage, vascular invasion, and tumor diameter were independent risk factors affecting survival and prognosis in patients with CC. However, the surgical approach did not significantly influence prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The 5-year overall survival rate of patients with early CC was 89.0%. Laparoscopic surgery did not adversely affect the prognosis of early CC patients. Both surgical approaches demonstrate favorable prospects for treating early CC. Prognosis in early CC is influenced by clinical stage, vascular invasion, and tumor diameter, rather than the surgical approach used.

摘要

目的

评估不同手术方式下早期宫颈癌(CC)患者的5年生存率,并分析影响这些患者预后的因素。

方法

对2005年1月至2017年12月在广东省妇女儿童医院接受早期CC手术治疗的患者进行回顾性分析和随访研究。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox回归模型分析预后因素。

结果

共纳入726例患者,其中开放手术组347例,腹腔镜组379例。开放组深层间质浸润的比例显著高于腹腔镜组(分别为228/347和194/379;P<0.05)。同样,开放组的肿瘤直径(<4 cm)显著大于腹腔镜组(分别为51/347和26/379;P<0.05)。两组在妊娠次数、分娩次数、绝经情况、避孕方法、高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染、临床分期、病理类型、分化程度、宫旁浸润或淋巴结转移方面无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。平均随访期为53.15±15.33个月。所有患者的总体5年生存率(OS)为89.0%,无病生存率(DFS)为86.8%。开放组和腹腔镜组的5年OS率分别为87.2%和90.4%,5年DFS率分别为84.6%和88.6%,两组间无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。多因素分析显示,临床分期、血管侵犯和肿瘤直径是影响CC患者生存和预后的独立危险因素。然而,手术方式对预后没有显著影响。

结论

早期CC患者的5年总生存率为89.0%。腹腔镜手术对早期CC患者的预后没有不利影响。两种手术方式在治疗早期CC方面均显示出良好的前景。早期CC的预后受临床分期、血管侵犯和肿瘤直径的影响,而非所采用的手术方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f0b/11872751/496baad8b8da/432_2025_6139_Fig3a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f0b/11872751/43fa1a49ffac/432_2025_6139_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f0b/11872751/bf8638ad575a/432_2025_6139_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f0b/11872751/496baad8b8da/432_2025_6139_Fig3a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f0b/11872751/43fa1a49ffac/432_2025_6139_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f0b/11872751/bf8638ad575a/432_2025_6139_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f0b/11872751/496baad8b8da/432_2025_6139_Fig3a_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of prognosis and related influencing factors of different surgical approaches for early cervical cancer.早期宫颈癌不同手术方式的预后及相关影响因素分析
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar 1;151(3):97. doi: 10.1007/s00432-025-06139-4.
2
[Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].[局部晚期宫颈癌患者接受腹腔镜手术或开腹手术预后的比较分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 25;55(9):609-616. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200727-00612.
3
[Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer].[早期宫颈癌腹腔镜手术与开放手术的短期和长期结果比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 23;39(6):458-466. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.06.011.
4
[Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal surgery in stage Ⅰa1 (LVSI)-Ⅰb1 cervical cancer patients with different tumor size: a big database in China].[不同肿瘤大小的Ⅰa1期(淋巴血管间隙浸润)-Ⅰb1期宫颈癌患者腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的长期肿瘤学结局:一项中国大型数据库研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 25;55(9):589-599. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200515-00411.
5
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].[I a2-II a2期宫颈癌腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术后的长期肿瘤学结局:一项配对队列研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901.
6
[Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma].腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈腺癌的疗效与安全性
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 25;55(9):600-608. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200410-00313.
7
[Effects of colpotomic approaches on prognosis and recurrence sites of stage Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2 cervical cancer after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy].[阴道切开术式对Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2期宫颈癌腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术后预后及复发部位的影响]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jan 25;58(1):49-59. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20221022-00647.
8
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Ia1-Ib1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Multi-Center Study with 10 Years' Experiences in the Real World.Ia1-Ib1期宫颈癌患者腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的结局:一项具有10年真实世界经验的多中心研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):2213-2222. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16637-3. Epub 2024 Dec 29.
9
Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.淋巴结阴性Ⅰ期-ⅡA 期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术后无病生存预测的术后列线图。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jul;40(5):699-704. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1652888. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
10
Total laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer: disease recurrence and survival comparison.IA2 - IB1期宫颈癌全腹腔镜与开放性根治性子宫切除术:疾病复发与生存比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Jun;24(6):373-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0514. Epub 2014 Apr 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehensive assessment of postoperative recurrence and survival in patients with cervical cancer.宫颈癌患者术后复发与生存的综合评估。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;50(10):108583. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108583. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
2
Multiparametric mri-based radiomics nomogram for predicting lymph-vascular space invasion in cervical cancer.基于多参数 MRI 的放射组学列线图预测宫颈癌淋巴管脉管间隙侵犯。
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Jul 5;24(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01344-y.
3
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Evaluation and Follow-Up of Invasive Cancer of the Cervix: 2023 Update.
ACR 适宜性标准®:子宫颈浸润性癌的治疗前评估和随访:2023 年更新。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2024 Jun;21(6S):S249-S267. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.026.
4
Association of Radical Hysterectomy Surgical Volume and Survival for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Correction.
Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jan 1;143(1):e21. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005462.
5
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2024.美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南见解:宫颈癌,2024年第1版
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Dec;21(12):1224-1233. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0062.
6
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
7
[Analysis on cancer incidence and mortality attributed to human papillomavirus infection in China, 2016].《2016年中国因人类乳头瘤病毒感染所致癌症的发病率与死亡率分析》
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2022 May 10;43(5):702-708. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20211010-00777.
8
The Surgeon's Proficiency Affected Survival Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 851 Patients.外科医生的技术水平影响早期宫颈癌微创手术的生存结局:一项对851例患者的回顾性研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 16;11:787198. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.787198. eCollection 2021.
9
A Multicentric Randomized Trial to Evaluate the ROle of Uterine MANipulator on Laparoscopic/Robotic HYsterectomy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: The ROMANHY Trial.一项评估子宫操纵器在腹腔镜/机器人辅助子宫切除术中治疗早期子宫内膜癌作用的多中心随机试验:ROMANHY试验
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 10;11:720894. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.720894. eCollection 2021.
10
Impact of surgeon learning curve in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy on early stage cervical cancer patient survival.外科医生在早期宫颈癌患者微创根治性子宫切除术中学习曲线对患者生存的影响。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021 Sep;13(3):231-239. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.3.035.