Frol Senta, Benali Faysal, Rouchaud Aymeric, Knapen Robrecht R M M, van Zwam Wim H
Department of Vascular Neurology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
CVIR Endovasc. 2025 Mar 3;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s42155-025-00532-3.
The total amount of heparin administered through flush fluids in stroke patients is not considered in recent trials, possibly influencing main results. We investigated the use of heparin among treating physicians worldwide.
We conducted a survey from November 2022 to January 2023 to identify the variability of heparin administration during stroke endovascular treatment (EVT). We calculated the total heparin dose per hour (IU/h) by adding the intravenous (IV)-bolus dose to the amount administered through flush fluids, calculated by a multiplication of the number of infusion bags, drip rate[mL/h] and heparin concentration[IU/L].
A total of 315 participants from different countries worldwide completed the survey and 231/315(73%) respondents administer heparin during EVT. The majority administered heparin only through flush fluids (168/231; 72.7%), followed by both IV-bolus and flush fluids (36/231; 16%), and those who used only an IV-bolus (27/231; 11.7%). From the participants that administer heparin through flush fluids, the median heparin concentration was 2000 IU/L (range:100 IU/L-10000 IU/L). The total heparin dose (administered through flush fluids and IV-bolus) among 23 respondents showed a median of 4650 IU/h (IQR:3432-5900). Among the respondents who administer heparin through IV-bolus only, the median was 5250 IU (IQR:3750-7500).
This survey revealed variable heparin doses administered by physicians worldwide during EVT and reflects the lack of international guidelines. Caution is warranted, specifically during complex/long EVT procedures. Furthermore, heparin flush doses should be considered in future trials regarding periprocedural anticoagulants, since imbalances could potentially confound results.
近期试验未考虑中风患者通过冲洗液给予肝素的总量,这可能影响主要结果。我们调查了全球治疗医师对肝素的使用情况。
我们在2022年11月至2023年1月进行了一项调查,以确定中风血管内治疗(EVT)期间肝素给药的变异性。我们通过将静脉推注剂量与通过冲洗液给予的量相加来计算每小时肝素总剂量(IU/h),冲洗液给予的量通过输液袋数量、滴注速率[mL/h]和肝素浓度[IU/L]相乘来计算。
来自全球不同国家的315名参与者完成了调查,231/315(73%)的受访者在EVT期间给予肝素。大多数人仅通过冲洗液给予肝素(168/231;72.7%),其次是静脉推注和冲洗液两者(36/231;16%),以及仅使用静脉推注的人(27/231;11.7%)。在通过冲洗液给予肝素的参与者中,肝素浓度中位数为2000 IU/L(范围:100 IU/L - 10000 IU/L)。23名受访者的肝素总剂量(通过冲洗液和静脉推注给予)中位数为4650 IU/h(四分位间距:3432 - 5900)。在仅通过静脉推注给予肝素的受访者中,中位数为5250 IU(四分位间距:3750 - 7500)。
这项调查揭示了全球医师在EVT期间给予肝素的剂量存在差异,反映出缺乏国际指南。需要谨慎,特别是在复杂/长时间的EVT手术期间。此外,在未来关于围手术期抗凝剂的试验中应考虑肝素冲洗剂量,因为差异可能会混淆结果。