• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

床边护理转型:内科床边操作服务对住院医师培训及患者结局的影响

"Transforming Care at the Bedside: The Impact of the Medicine Bedside Procedure Service on Resident Training and Patient Outcomes".

作者信息

Umpierrez Adrian P, Swartz Sheila, Puetz Joseph, Voigt Lara, Madenberg Devin, Franco Sadud Ricardo

机构信息

Department of Medicine Emory University.

Department of Medicine Medical College of Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Brown Hosp Med. 2025 Jan 1;4(1):23-29. doi: 10.56305/001c.127259. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.56305/001c.127259
PMID:40027461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11864427/
Abstract

Hospitalized patients frequently require various medical procedures, including lumbar punctures, paracenteses, and pulmonary drains, with significant annual volumes in the U.S. While bedside procedures are generally safe, their complication rates range from 0.1% to 3%, depending on the procedure. The Medicine Bedside Procedure Service (MBPS) at the Medical College of Wisconsin/Froedtert Health System was established as a standalone service in 2015 to enhance the training of Internal Medicine (IM) residents in common bedside procedures and Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS), while also aiming to reduce patient wait times for procedures and length of hospital stays. The study aimed to evaluate the development and implementation of the MBPS, focusing on the characteristics of the first 12,000 procedural encounters, the educational impact on IM residents, and the service's effects on patient outcomes. This retrospective study analyzed 12,387 procedural encounters involving 6,942 unique patients from September 2015 to June 2022. Patient demographics were assessed, including age, sex, race, language, payer status, and comorbidities. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize the data, including means and standard deviations for continuous variables and frequencies for categorical variables. The patient demographic indicated a predominance of males (53.1%), non-Hispanic Whites (68.8%), and a significant portion covered by Medicaid (71.6%). The average patient age was 64.7 years. The MBPS performed an average of 5.2 procedures per day, with paracentesis (34.6%), thoracentesis (27.3%), and lumbar puncture (21.1%) being the most common procedures. The overall complication rate was low at 0.3%, with the majority of complications occurring in thoracentesis (56%). The MBPS has contributed to the educational development of IM residents, evidenced by their increased proficiency and procedural certification rates, while also improving patient outcomes, including reduced lengths of stay and hospital costs. The service has optimized patient flow and increased satisfaction through timely and safe procedural care. Despite challenges in fostering a supportive culture for bedside procedures and ensuring effective communication with interventional radiology, the MBPS exemplifies the advantages of bedside procedures. Moving forward, plans include expanding into outpatient settings and incorporating advanced POCUS capabilities to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making at the bedside. Limitations of this single-center study and lack of comparative groups suggest the need for further research to validate these findings across diverse healthcare settings.

摘要

住院患者经常需要进行各种医疗程序,包括腰椎穿刺、腹腔穿刺和胸腔引流,在美国每年的实施量都很大。虽然床边操作一般是安全的,但根据操作不同,其并发症发生率在0.1%至3%之间。威斯康星医学院/弗罗伊德特医疗系统的内科床边操作服务(MBPS)于2015年作为一项独立服务设立,旨在加强内科(IM)住院医师在常见床边操作和床旁超声(POCUS)方面的培训,同时也旨在减少患者等待操作的时间和住院时间。该研究旨在评估MBPS的发展和实施情况,重点关注前12000次操作的特点、对IM住院医师的教育影响以及该服务对患者结局的影响。这项回顾性研究分析了2015年9月至2022年6月期间涉及6942名独特患者的12387次操作。评估了患者的人口统计学特征,包括年龄、性别、种族、语言、付款人状况和合并症。采用描述性统计方法汇总数据,包括连续变量的均值和标准差以及分类变量的频率。患者人口统计学特征显示男性占主导(53.1%),非西班牙裔白人占主导(68.8%),且很大一部分由医疗补助覆盖(71.6%)。患者的平均年龄为64.7岁。MBPS平均每天进行5.2次操作,其中腹腔穿刺(34.6%)、胸腔穿刺(27.3%)和腰椎穿刺(21.1%)是最常见的操作。总体并发症发生率较低,为0.3%,大多数并发症发生在胸腔穿刺中(56%)。MBPS促进了IM住院医师的教育发展,表现为他们的熟练程度提高和操作认证率上升,同时也改善了患者结局,包括缩短住院时间和降低住院费用。该服务通过及时、安全的操作护理优化了患者流程并提高了满意度。尽管在营造支持床边操作的文化以及确保与介入放射学的有效沟通方面存在挑战,但MBPS体现了床边操作的优势。展望未来,计划包括扩展到门诊环境并纳入先进的POCUS功能,以加强床边的诊断和治疗决策。这项单中心研究的局限性以及缺乏对照组表明需要进一步研究,以在不同的医疗环境中验证这些发现。

相似文献

1
"Transforming Care at the Bedside: The Impact of the Medicine Bedside Procedure Service on Resident Training and Patient Outcomes".床边护理转型:内科床边操作服务对住院医师培训及患者结局的影响
J Brown Hosp Med. 2025 Jan 1;4(1):23-29. doi: 10.56305/001c.127259. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of a medical procedure service on patient safety, procedure quality and resident training opportunities.一项医疗程序服务对患者安全、程序质量和住院医师培训机会的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Mar;29(3):485-90. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2709-5. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
3
Implementation of an academic hospital medicine procedure service: 5-year experience.实施医院内科医学程序服务:5 年经验。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2021 Aug;49(3):209-215. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2021.1890958. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
4
Boosting Confidence and Skills: A Multidisciplinary Evaluation of an Emergency Department-Based Procedure Team Rotation.增强信心与技能:基于急诊科的操作团队轮转的多学科评估
Cureus. 2025 Jan 8;17(1):e77155. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77155. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
The effect of simulation-based mastery learning on thoracentesis referral patterns.基于模拟的掌握学习对胸腔穿刺转诊模式的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2016 Nov;11(11):792-795. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2623. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
6
The Procedure Coordinator: A Resident-Driven Initiative to Increase Opportunity for Inpatient Procedures.程序协调员:一项由住院医师推动的增加住院手术机会的倡议。
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Oct;10(5):583-586. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00399.1.
7
Supervising the supervisors--procedural training and supervision in internal medicine residency.监督监督者——内科住院医师培训中的程序培训和监督。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Apr;25(4):351-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1226-z.
8
The design, performance and organizational impact of a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) elective for internal medicine residents.一项针对内科住院医师的床旁超声(POCUS)选修课的设计、实施及组织影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06802-x.
9
Advancing Internal Medicine Training: Experience of a Bedside Procedure Service as a Resident Elective.推进内科培训:作为住院医师选修的床边操作服务的经验。
Hosp Top. 2023 Apr-Jun;101(2):127-134. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2021.1984863. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
10
Characteristics and impact of bedside procedure services in the United States: A systematic review.美国床边程序服务的特点和影响:系统评价。
J Hosp Med. 2022 Aug;17(8):644-652. doi: 10.1002/jhm.12848. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing Internal Medicine Training: Experience of a Bedside Procedure Service as a Resident Elective.推进内科培训:作为住院医师选修的床边操作服务的经验。
Hosp Top. 2023 Apr-Jun;101(2):127-134. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2021.1984863. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
2
Impact of a Hospitalist-Run Procedure Service on Time to Paracentesis and Length of Stay.由住院医师管理的操作服务对腹腔穿刺术时间和住院时间的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2021 Aug;16(8):476-479. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3582.
3
Implementation of an academic hospital medicine procedure service: 5-year experience.实施医院内科医学程序服务:5 年经验。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2021 Aug;49(3):209-215. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2021.1890958. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
4
Things We Do for No Reason™: Routine Correction of Elevated INR and Thrombocytopenia Prior to Paracentesis in Patients with Cirrhosis.我们无端做的事™:肝硬化患者腹腔穿刺术前常规纠正国际标准化比值升高和血小板减少症
J Hosp Med. 2021 Feb;16(2):102-104. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3458.
5
Society of Interventional Radiology Consensus Guidelines for the Periprocedural Management of Thrombotic and Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Image-Guided Interventions-Part II: Recommendations: Endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe.介入放射学会关于接受经皮影像引导介入治疗患者围手术期血栓形成和出血风险管理的共识指南 - 第二部分:建议:得到加拿大介入放射学会以及欧洲心血管和介入放射学会认可
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Aug;30(8):1168-1184.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.04.017. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
6
Raising the Bar for Procedural Competency Among Hospitalists.提高住院医师的操作能力标准。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9):654-655. doi: 10.7326/M18-3007. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
7
Epidemiology of lumbar punctures in hospitalized patients in the United States.美国住院患者腰椎穿刺的流行病学。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 13;13(12):e0208622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208622. eCollection 2018.
8
Consensus guidelines for lumbar puncture in patients with neurological diseases.神经疾病患者腰椎穿刺的共识指南。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 May 18;8:111-126. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.04.007. eCollection 2017.
9
Examining Invasive Bedside Procedure Performance at an Academic Medical Center.在一所学术医疗中心检查侵入性床边操作的执行情况。
South Med J. 2016 Jul;109(7):402-7. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000485.
10
Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Thoracentesis.胸腔穿刺术后以患者为中心的结局
Pleura (Thousand Oaks). 2015 Jan-Dec;2. doi: 10.1177/2373997515600404. Epub 2015 Sep 1.