Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Hosp Med. 2022 Aug;17(8):644-652. doi: 10.1002/jhm.12848. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
Bedside procedure services are increasingly employed within internal medicine departments to meet clinical needs and improve trainee education. Published literature on these largely comprises single-center studies; an updated systematic review is needed to synthesize available data.
This review examined published literature on the structure and function of bedside procedure services and their impact on clinical and educational outcomes (PROSPERO ID: 192466).
Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework, multiple databases were searched for publications from 2000 to 2021.
STUDY SELECTION, DATA EXTRACTION, AND DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirteen single-center studies were identified, including 12 observational studies and 1 randomized trial. Data were synthesized in tabular and narrative format. Services were typically staffed by hospitalists or pulmonologists. At a minimum, each offered paracentesis, thoracentesis, and lumbar puncture. While there was considerable heterogeneity in service structures, these broadly fit either Model A (service performing the procedure) or Model B (service supervising the primary team). Procedure services led to increases in procedure volumes and self-efficacy among medical residents. Assessment of clinical outcomes was limited by heterogeneous definitions of complication rates and by sparse head-to-head data involving suitable comparators. Published data pointed to high success rates, low complication rates, and high patient satisfaction, with a recent study also demonstrating a decreased length of stay.
There are relatively few published studies describing the characteristics of bedside procedure services and their impact on clinical and educational outcomes. Limited data point to considerable heterogeneity in service design, a positive impact on medical trainees, and a positive impact on patient-related outcomes.
为满足临床需求和提高学员教育水平,内科科室越来越多地采用床边程序服务。关于这些服务的文献主要包括单中心研究;需要进行更新的系统评价以综合现有数据。
本综述检查了关于床边程序服务的结构和功能及其对临床和教育结果的影响的已发表文献(PROSPERO 标识符:192466)。
使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目框架,从 2000 年到 2021 年,多个数据库被搜索以查找出版物。
研究选择、数据提取和数据综合:确定了 13 项单中心研究,包括 12 项观察性研究和 1 项随机试验。数据以表格和叙述形式综合。服务通常由医院医生或肺科医生提供。至少每个服务都提供腹腔穿刺术、胸腔穿刺术和腰椎穿刺术。虽然服务结构存在相当大的异质性,但这些结构大致符合模型 A(服务执行程序)或模型 B(服务监督主要团队)。床边程序服务导致医学住院医师的程序量和自我效能增加。由于并发症发生率的定义存在差异,以及缺乏适当比较者的头对头数据,临床结果的评估受到限制。已发表的数据表明成功率高、并发症发生率低和患者满意度高,最近的一项研究还表明住院时间缩短。
描述床边程序服务的特征及其对临床和教育结果的影响的已发表研究相对较少。有限的数据表明服务设计存在相当大的异质性,对医学学员有积极影响,对患者相关结果也有积极影响。