Loh Wann Jia, Pang Jing, Simon Oliver, Chan Dick C, Watts Gerald F
Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Department of Endocrinology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Feb 14;12:1527351. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1527351. eCollection 2025.
BACKGROUND: Multiple guidelines recommend detection of and early risk factor management for elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. Effective implementation requires assessment of knowledge and practices regarding elevated Lp(a) among medical specialists. AIM: To assess awareness, knowledge and practices of the detection and treatment of elevated Lp(a) among specialist physicians in Singapore. METHODS: Seventy-five practicing specialists in cardiology ( = 33) or endocrinology ( = 42) anonymously completed a structured questionnaire that assessed the above three aims. RESULTS: The majority of respondents (83%) rated their familiarity with Lp(a) as at least average, with a greater percentage of endocrinologists being less familiar with Lp(a) than cardiologists (29% vs. 3%, < 0.01). 57% were aware of at least one guideline or consensus statement on Lp(a), which was more frequent among cardiologists than endocrinologists (70% vs. 48%, = 0.05). There were major gaps in knowledge of the prevalence, pathophysiological role, clinical significance and management of elevated Lp(a), correct responses being less than 30%; 44% of respondents (33% cardiologists and 52% endocrinologists) never tested for Lp(a), lack of effective treatment being the most common barrier (59%). A higher proportion of specialists that did not test for Lp(a) rated familiarity with Lp(a) as being low compared with specialists that tested for Lp(a) regularly (33% vs. 13%, = 0.02). Education and training were considered most useful for improving care of patients with elevated Lp(a). CONCLUSION: Major gaps in awareness, knowledge and management of elevated Lp(a) were identified among specialists in Singapore. Education and training of specialists are required to overcome initial barriers to testing.
背景:多项指南推荐对脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]升高进行检测并尽早管理风险因素。有效实施需要评估医学专家对Lp(a)升高的认知和实践情况。 目的:评估新加坡专科医生对Lp(a)升高的检测与治疗的知晓度、知识水平和实践情况。 方法:75名从事心脏病学(n = 33)或内分泌学(n = 42)的专科医生匿名填写了一份结构化问卷,该问卷评估了上述三个目标。 结果:大多数受访者(83%)将他们对Lp(a)的熟悉程度评为至少中等,与心脏病专家相比,内分泌专家中对Lp(a)不太熟悉的比例更高(29%对3%,P < 0.01)。57%的人知晓至少一项关于Lp(a)的指南或共识声明,心脏病专家比内分泌专家更常知晓(70%对48%,P = 0.05)。在Lp(a)升高的患病率、病理生理作用、临床意义和管理方面存在重大知识差距,正确回答率低于30%;44%的受访者(33%的心脏病专家和52%的内分泌专家)从未检测过Lp(a),缺乏有效治疗是最常见的障碍(59%)。与定期检测Lp(a)的专家相比,未检测Lp(a)的专家中认为对Lp(a)熟悉程度低的比例更高(33%对13%,P = 0.02)。教育和培训被认为对改善Lp(a)升高患者的护理最有用。 结论:在新加坡的专科医生中,发现了对Lp(a)升高的知晓度、知识水平和管理方面的重大差距。需要对专科医生进行教育和培训,以克服检测的初始障碍。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025-2-14
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017-7-17
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2022-4-21
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024-11-23
Lancet. 2024-9-28
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024-4-3
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023-9-19