• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加的夫眼形分析方案(CESAP):生成眼前部表面的数字图像。

The Cardiff Eye Shape Analysis Protocol (CESAP): Producing a digital representation of the anterior ocular surface.

作者信息

Turner Jennifer M, Le Chi Hieu, Murphy Paul J

机构信息

Cardiff University, School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Maindy Road, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ, UK.

University of Greenwich, School of Engineering, Central Avenue, Medway, ME4 4TB, UK.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2025 Feb 10;11(4):e42601. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42601. eCollection 2025 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42601
PMID:40028595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11870247/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a method for accurate 3-dimensional (3D) representation of the anterior ocular surface (AOS) based on ocular impression and reverse engineering of an AOS plaster biomodel.

METHODS

An AOS plaster biomodel was fabricated using ocular impression and a developed casting support device (CSD) and landmark registration element (LRE) to stabilise and consistently fix the impression casting tray within the casting support during the casting process. The touch-trigger probe on a co-ordinate measurement machine (CMM) digitised the AOS plaster biomodel to represent the AOS shape. The CSD and LRE were manufactured using an Additive Manufacturing selective laser sintering (SLS) process. A single stainless-steel ball (diameter: 22 mm) was cast as a surrogate AOS biomodel using polyvinylsiloxane impression material. The surrogate biomodel which was used to evaluate material selection and stability of the AOS biomodels fabricated using the CSD and LRE, and to evaluate repeatability and reproducibility of the point cloud data collection methods. The points of circular profiles were measured at different Z values in mm: z = -1 mm, z = -2 mm, z = - 3 mm, z = -4 mm and z = -5 mm.

RESULTS

The measurements were highly repeatable with an acceptable tolerance. For the typical case of the surrogate AOS biomodel, the average distance of the digitised points to the best-fit sphere of all the digitised points from four measurements ranges from 0.002 to 0.010 mm. The shrinkage study of the surrogate AOS biomodels was conducted, with measurements taken one month apart for comparison. The analysis results showed that most of the surrogate AOS biomodels reduced in size but within an acceptable tolerance, in which the mean error is from 0.005 to 0.010 mm for the 2D circular profiles measured at Z = -4 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The Cardiff Eye Shape Analysis Protocol (CESAP) provides a repeatable and consistent method for producing solid, white-plaster, representations of a plaster cast AOS biomodel. Casting an impression in white plaster (Novadur™) produces a consistent surrogate AOS biomodel of a single stainless-steel 22 mm diameter ball. CESAP can be used as a framework for consistently converting an ocular impression into a 'real' AOS model that can be reverse-engineered to create 3D CAD models of the AOS shape for potential applications in optical image (topographer) calibration, prosthetic shell and scleral lens design, and AOS database development.

摘要

目的

基于眼印模和眼前节(AOS)石膏生物模型的逆向工程,开发一种准确的眼前节三维(3D)呈现方法。

方法

使用眼印模和开发的铸型支撑装置(CSD)及地标注册元件(LRE)制作AOS石膏生物模型,以便在铸造过程中稳定并始终如一地将印模铸造托盘固定在铸型支撑内。坐标测量机(CMM)上的接触式触发探头对AOS石膏生物模型进行数字化处理,以呈现AOS形状。CSD和LRE采用增材制造选择性激光烧结(SLS)工艺制造。使用聚乙烯基硅氧烷印模材料铸造单个不锈钢球(直径:22 mm)作为替代AOS生物模型。该替代生物模型用于评估使用CSD和LRE制造的AOS生物模型的材料选择和稳定性,以及评估点云数据采集方法的可重复性和再现性。在不同的Z值(单位为mm)下测量圆形轮廓的点:z = -1 mm、z = -2 mm、z = -3 mm、z = -4 mm和z = -5 mm。

结果

测量具有高度可重复性且公差可接受。对于替代AOS生物模型的典型情况,四次测量中数字化点到所有数字化点最佳拟合球的平均距离在0.002至0.010 mm之间。对替代AOS生物模型进行了收缩研究,相隔一个月进行测量以作比较。分析结果表明,大多数替代AOS生物模型尺寸减小,但在可接受的公差范围内,其中在Z = -4 mm处测量的二维圆形轮廓平均误差为0.005至0.010 mm。

结论

加的夫眼形分析方案(CESAP)提供了一种可重复且一致的方法,用于制作石膏铸型AOS生物模型的实心白色石膏模型。用白色石膏(Novadur™)浇铸印模可制作出直径22 mm的单个不锈钢球的一致替代AOS生物模型。CESAP可作为一个框架,用于将眼印模一致地转换为“真实”的AOS模型,该模型可进行逆向工程以创建AOS形状的3D CAD模型,用于光学图像(地形图仪)校准、假体外壳和巩膜镜设计以及AOS数据库开发等潜在应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/e1c4637ccac7/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/b87808ead434/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/90a941a84f7d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/6556e78a02a1/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/eace26a7a49d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/ee0f7b03131b/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/c81e999ada54/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/e1c4637ccac7/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/b87808ead434/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/90a941a84f7d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/6556e78a02a1/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/eace26a7a49d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/ee0f7b03131b/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/c81e999ada54/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11870247/e1c4637ccac7/fx1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Cardiff Eye Shape Analysis Protocol (CESAP): Producing a digital representation of the anterior ocular surface.加的夫眼形分析方案(CESAP):生成眼前部表面的数字图像。
Heliyon. 2025 Feb 10;11(4):e42601. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42601. eCollection 2025 Feb 28.
2
Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.传统石膏模型、印模扫描获得的数字模型和石膏模型扫描获得的数字模型之间的牙齿测量比较。
Int Orthod. 2019 Mar;17(1):151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
3
[Computer aided design and 3-dimensional printing for the production of custom trays of maxillary edentulous jaws based on 3-dimensional scan of primary impression].基于初印模三维扫描的上颌无牙颌定制托盘制作的计算机辅助设计与三维打印
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Oct 18;48(5):900-904.
4
Evaluation of accuracy of photogrammetry with 3D scanning and conventional impression method for craniomaxillofacial defects using a software analysis.基于软件分析的 3D 扫描和传统印模法在颅颌面缺损中的精度评估。
Trials. 2022 Dec 27;23(1):1048. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07005-1.
5
3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.由数字印模和传统印模制作的压制及CAD/CAM二硅酸锂全冠的三维和二维边缘适合性
J Prosthodont. 2014 Dec;23(8):610-7. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12180. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
6
Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods.五种种植体印模技术的准确性:夹板材料和方法的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Dec;3(4):177-85. doi: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.4.177. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
7
Effect of polyvinylsiloxane material and impression handling on the accuracy of digital models.聚乙烯基硅氧烷材料及印模处理对数字模型准确性的影响
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 May;149(5):634-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.027.
8
Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.口腔内扫描与石膏模型的有效性比较:牙科测量和三维表面分析的体内比较
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 15;11(6):e0157713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157713. eCollection 2016.
9
Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.多单位种植体印模的准确性:传统技术与数字化流程的比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1253-1262. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2217-9. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
10
A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.石膏模型、数字化模型与重建研究模型准确性的比较。
J Orthod. 2008 Sep;35(3):191-201; discussion 175. doi: 10.1179/146531207225022626.

本文引用的文献

1
Automatic data-driven design and 3D printing of custom ocular prostheses.自动数据驱动设计和定制眼假体的 3D 打印。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 27;15(1):1360. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45345-5.
2
The corneo-scleral junction assessed with optical coherence tomography.利用光学相干断层扫描评估角巩膜连接。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 9;17(12):e0278884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278884. eCollection 2022.
3
CLEAR - Scleral lenses.硬性透气性角膜接触镜。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021 Apr;44(2):270-288. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
4
Multicenter review of impression-based scleral devices.基于印模的巩膜装置的多中心综述。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021 Oct;44(5):101380. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
5
Ocular Impression-Taking-Which Material Is Best?
Eye Contact Lens. 2019 Jan;45(1):55-60. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000496.
6
An analysis of anterior scleral shape and its role in the design and fitting of scleral contact lenses.巩膜前表面形态分析及其在巩膜接触镜设计和适配中的作用。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Apr;41(2):205-213. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
7
Mean shape of the human limbus.人眼角膜缘的平均形态。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 May;43(5):667-672. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.02.027.
8
Precise measurement of scleral radius using anterior eye profilometry.使用眼前节轮廓测量法精确测量巩膜半径。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Feb;40(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
9
Principles of operation, accuracy and precision of an Eye Surface Profiler.眼表轮廓仪的操作原理、准确性和精密度
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016 May;36(3):266-78. doi: 10.1111/opo.12292.