Revelle William, Condon David
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University.
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon.
Psychol Methods. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1037/met0000729.
How to evaluate how well a psychological scale measures just one construct is a recurring problem in assessment. We introduce an index, u, of the unidimensionality and homogeneity of a scale. u is just the product of two other indices: τ (a measure of τ equivalence) and ρc (a measure of congeneric fit). By combining these two indices into one, we provide a simple index of the unidimensionality and homogeneity of a scale. We evaluate u through simulations and with real data sets. Simulations of u across one-factor scales ranging from three to 24 items with various levels of factor homogeneity show that τ and, therefore, u are sensitive to the degree of factor homogeneity. Additional tests with multifactorial scales representing 9, 18, 27, and 36 items with a hierarchical factor structure varying in a general factor loading show that ρc and, therefore, u are sensitive to the general factor saturation of a test. We also demonstrate the performance of u on 45 different publicly available personality and ability measures. Comparisons with traditional measures (i.e., ωh, α, ωt, comparative fit index, and explained common variance) show that u has greater sensitivity to unidimensional structure and less sensitivity to the number of items in a scale. u is easily calculated with open source statistical packages and is relatively robust to sample sizes ranging from 100 to 5,000. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
如何评估一个心理量表对单一结构的测量效果是评估中反复出现的问题。我们引入了一个量表的单维度性和同质性指标u。u只是另外两个指标的乘积:τ(τ等价性的一种度量)和ρc(同属拟合的一种度量)。通过将这两个指标合并为一个,我们提供了一个量表单维度性和同质性的简单指标。我们通过模拟和实际数据集来评估u。对包含3至24个项目、具有不同因子同质性水平的单因素量表的u进行模拟,结果表明τ,进而u,对因子同质性程度敏感。对具有9、18、27和36个项目、具有层次因子结构且一般因子负荷不同的多因素量表进行的额外测试表明,ρc,进而u,对测试的一般因子饱和度敏感。我们还展示了u在45种不同的公开可用人格和能力测量上的表现。与传统测量方法(即ωh、α、ωt、比较拟合指数和解释共同方差)的比较表明,u对单维度结构更敏感,对量表中的项目数量不太敏感。u可以使用开源统计软件包轻松计算,并且对于100至5000的样本量相对稳健。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)