• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们需要脱位股骨头吗?对采用改良邓恩手术两种变体治疗的不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)队列进行回顾性比较。

Do we need to dislocate the femoral head? A retrospective comparison of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) cohorts treated by two variations of the modified Dunn procedure.

作者信息

de Moura Vallim Frederico Coutinho, de Angeli Luiz Renato Agrizzi, Serafim Bárbara Lívia Corrêa, Manca Angelo

机构信息

Hospital Estadual da Criança, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Mar 3;35(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04194-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00590-025-04194-8
PMID:40029464
Abstract

PURPOSE

Evaluate a modification of the original modified Dunn technique, for unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), where the proximal femoral epiphysis is not dislocated from the acetabulum.

METHODS

We compared two cohorts of patients with unstable SCFE: one operated with dislocation of the femoral epiphysis (DG) and the other without (NDG). Groups were compared demographically and radiographically. Femoral head bleeding was determined after reduction of the slip. Operative time, development of AVN and other complications were registered. The influence of surgical technique and covariates on the slip correction was modeled by a generalized linear mixed model. The risk of necrosis was modeled by logistic regression.

RESULTS

The groups (20 patients each) were similar regarding age (p = 0.8), time until operation (p = 0.8), gender (p = 1), laterality (p = 1) and race (p = 0.45). Operative time was longer in DG (p = 0.07). Not dislocating the head reduced Southwick angle correction by 3.74 degrees (p = 0.04). Femoral head bleeding was associated with an 85.14% reduction in AVN odds (p = 0.04). Shorter operative time (< 200 min) decreased AVN rate by 44% (p = 0.37). Both surgical techniques had similar complication rates, including 20% AVN (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Not dislocating the femoral head in the modified Dunn technique presents similar AVN rates when compared to the original operation, shortens the operative time but provides a lower degree of Southwick angle correction. Femoral head bleeding following slip reduction is a good prognostic indicator for AVN occurrence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-Retrospective comparative study.

摘要

目的

评估对原始改良邓恩技术的一种改进方法,用于治疗不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE),即股骨近端骨骺未从髋臼脱位的情况。

方法

我们比较了两组不稳定型SCFE患者:一组进行了股骨头脱位手术(DG),另一组未进行(NDG)。对两组患者进行了人口统计学和影像学比较。在滑脱复位后确定股骨头出血情况。记录手术时间、股骨头缺血性坏死(AVN)的发生情况及其他并发症。通过广义线性混合模型模拟手术技术和协变量对滑脱矫正的影响。通过逻辑回归模型模拟坏死风险。

结果

两组(每组20例患者)在年龄(p = 0.8)、手术前时间(p = 0.8)、性别(p = 1)、侧别(p = 1)和种族(p = 0.45)方面相似。DG组的手术时间更长(p = 0.07)。不使股骨头脱位使Southwick角矫正减少3.74度(p = 0.04)。股骨头出血与AVN发生率降低85.14%相关(p = 0.04)。较短的手术时间(<200分钟)使AVN发生率降低44%(p = 0.37)。两种手术技术的并发症发生率相似,包括20%的AVN发生率(p>0.05)。

结论

与原始手术相比,改良邓恩技术中不使股骨头脱位时AVN发生率相似,缩短了手术时间,但Southwick角矫正程度较低。滑脱复位后股骨头出血是AVN发生的良好预后指标。

证据水平

III级——回顾性比较研究。

相似文献

1
Do we need to dislocate the femoral head? A retrospective comparison of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) cohorts treated by two variations of the modified Dunn procedure.我们需要脱位股骨头吗?对采用改良邓恩手术两种变体治疗的不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)队列进行回顾性比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Mar 3;35(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04194-8.
2
Outcome of the modified Dunn procedure in severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis.改良 Dunn 手术治疗重型股骨头骨骺滑脱的疗效。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Nov 3;15(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02036-3.
3
Treatment of Unstable Slipped Capital Epiphysis Via the Modified Dunn Procedure.通过改良邓恩手术治疗不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Jan;38(1):3-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000737.
4
Is Subcapital Realignment for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis a Reproducible Technique? Midterm Results.股骨颈骨软骨下移位在股骨颈骨骺滑脱中的作用:一种可复制的技术?中期结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1627-1638. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002948. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
5
Restoration of Blood Flow to the Proximal Femoral Epiphysis in Unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis by Modified Dunn Procedure: A Preliminary Angiographic and Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Study.改良邓恩手术恢复不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱近端股骨骨骺血流:一项初步血管造影和颅内压监测研究
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Feb;38(2):94-99. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000779.
6
Treatment of Unstable Versus Stable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Using the Modified Dunn Procedure.使用改良邓恩手术治疗不稳定型与稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Sep;39(8):411-415. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000975.
7
Patients with severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated by the modified Dunn procedure have low rates of avascular necrosis, good outcomes, and little osteoarthritis at long-term follow-up.改良 Dunn 手术治疗严重股骨头骨骺滑脱的患者,在长期随访中,其缺血性坏死率低、疗效好,且骨关节炎发生率低。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Apr;101-B(4):403-414. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B4.BJJ-2018-1303.R1.
8
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between a Triplane Proximal Femoral Osteotomy and the Modified Dunn Procedure for Stable, Moderate to Severe Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.三平面股骨近端截骨术与改良邓恩手术治疗稳定型中重度股骨头骨骺滑脱的手术效果比较
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Aug;39(7):339-346. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000968.
9
Low Rate of AVN and Complications in Unstable SCFE With Epiphyseal-metaphyseal Discontinuity After Treatment With a Modified Dunn Procedure.改良 Dunn 手术后不稳定型骺板-干骺端连续性中断的儿童股骨头骨骺滑脱,其发生股骨头骨骺坏死和并发症的风险低。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1598-1610. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003123. Epub 2024 May 14.
10
Treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis with a modified Dunn procedure.改良 Dunn 手术治疗股骨头骨骺滑脱。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Dec 15;92(18):2898-908. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01385.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of the Artery of Ligamentum Teres in Revascularization in Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease.圆韧带动脉在 Legg-Calve-Perthes 病血运重建中的作用。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Apr 1;42(4):175-178. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002061.
2
Modified Dunn procedure versus percutaneous pinning in moderate/severe stable slipped capital femoral epiphyses.改良 Dunn 手术与经皮克氏针固定治疗中重度稳定型股骨颈骨骺滑脱。
Hip Int. 2022 Nov;32(6):813-819. doi: 10.1177/11207000211004862. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
3
Vascular Supply to the Femoral Head in Patients With Healed Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.
已愈合的股骨头骨骺滑脱患者股骨头的血管供应
J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Jan;40(1):e53-e57. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001382.
4
The modified Dunn procedure for slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the Bernese experience.改良邓恩法治疗股骨头骨骺滑脱:伯尔尼经验
J Child Orthop. 2017 Apr;11(2):138-146. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548-11-170046.
5
Treatment of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis With the Modified Dunn Procedure: A Multicenter Study.改良邓恩手术治疗股骨头骨骺滑脱:一项多中心研究
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Feb;39(2):71-75. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000936.
6
Iatrogenic Hip Instability Is a Devastating Complication After the Modified Dunn Procedure for Severe Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.医源性髋关节不稳定是重度股骨头骨骺滑脱改良邓恩手术后的一种严重并发症。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1229-1235. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5094-7.
7
Intraoperative Monitoring of Epiphyseal Perfusion in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.骺板血运术中监测在股骨颈骨骺滑脱中的应用
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jun 15;98(12):1030-40. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01002.
8
Is Assessment of Femoral Head Perfusion During Modified Dunn for Unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis an Accurate Indicator of Osteonecrosis?改良邓恩手术治疗不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱时评估股骨头灌注是否是骨坏死的准确指标?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Aug;474(8):1837-44. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4819-y. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
9
Closed reduction of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: high-risk factor for avascular necrosis.股骨头骨骺滑脱的闭合复位:缺血性坏死的高危因素。
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2015 Jul;24(4):281-5. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000170.
10
Modified Dunn Procedure is Superior to In Situ Pinning for Short-term Clinical and Radiographic Improvement in Severe Stable SCFE.改良邓恩手术在严重稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱的短期临床和影像学改善方面优于原位穿针固定术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2108-17. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4100-1. Epub 2014 Dec 12.