Thai Ngoc H, Post Brady, Young Gary, Noor-E-Alam Md
Center for Health Policy and Healthcare Research, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Health Sciences, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e2462580. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.62580.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a medically supervised program designed to improve heart health after a cardiac event. Despite its demonstrated clinical benefits, CR participation among eligible patients remains poor due to low referral rates and individual barriers to care.
To evaluate CR participation by patients who receive care from hospital-integrated physicians compared with independent physicians, and subsequently, to examine CR and recurrent cardiac hospitalizations.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated Medicare Part A and Part B claims data from calendar years 2016 to 2019. All analyses were conducted between January 1 and April 30, 2024. Patients were included if they had a qualifying event for CR between 2017 and 2018, and qualifying events were identified using diagnosis codes on inpatient claims and procedure codes on outpatient and carrier claims. Eligible patients also had to continuously enroll in fee-for-service Medicare for 12 months or more before and after the index event. Physicians' integration status and patients' CR participation were determined during the 12-month follow-up period. The study covariates were ascertained during the 12 months before the index event.
Hospital-integration status of the treating physician during follow-up.
Postindex CR participation was determined by qualifying procedure codes on outpatient and carrier claims.
The study consisted of 28 596 Medicare patients eligible for CR. Their mean (SD) age was 74.0 (9.6) years; 16 839 (58.9%) were male. A total of 9037 patients (31.6%) were treated by a hospital-integrated physician, of which 2995 (33.1%) received CR during follow-up. Logistic regression via propensity score weighting showed that having a hospital-integrated physician was associated with an 11% increase in the odds of receiving CR (odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.18). Additionally, CR participation was associated with a 14% decrease in the odds of recurrent cardiovascular-related hospitalizations (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.91).
The findings of this cohort study suggest that hospital integration has the potential to facilitate greater CR participation and improve heart care. Several factors may help explain this positive association, including enhanced care coordination and value-based payment policies. Further research is needed to assess the association of integration with other appropriate high-quality care activities.
心脏康复(CR)是一项在医学监督下旨在改善心脏事件后心脏健康的项目。尽管其临床益处已得到证实,但由于转诊率低和个体护理障碍,符合条件的患者参与心脏康复的情况仍然不佳。
评估由医院综合医生治疗的患者与独立医生治疗的患者在心脏康复参与方面的情况,并随后检查心脏康复与心脏疾病复发住院情况。
设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究评估了2016年至2019年医疗保险A部分和B部分的索赔数据。所有分析于2024年1月1日至4月30日进行。如果患者在2017年至2018年期间有符合心脏康复的事件,则纳入研究,符合条件的事件通过住院索赔上的诊断代码以及门诊和承运人索赔上的程序代码来确定。符合条件的患者在索引事件前后还必须连续参加按服务收费的医疗保险12个月或更长时间。在12个月的随访期内确定医生的综合状态和患者的心脏康复参与情况。在索引事件前的12个月内确定研究协变量。
随访期间治疗医生的医院综合状态。
索引事件后的心脏康复参与情况通过门诊和承运人索赔上的合格程序代码来确定。
该研究包括28596名符合心脏康复条件的医疗保险患者。他们的平均(标准差)年龄为74.0(9.6)岁;16839名(58.9%)为男性。共有9037名患者(31.6%)由医院综合医生治疗,其中2995名(33.1%)在随访期间接受了心脏康复。通过倾向得分加权的逻辑回归显示,由医院综合医生治疗与接受心脏康复的几率增加11%相关(优势比[OR],1.11;95%置信区间,1.05 - 1.18)。此外,心脏康复参与与心血管相关疾病复发住院的几率降低14%相关(OR,0.86;95%置信区间,0.81 - 0.91)。
这项队列研究的结果表明,医院综合模式有可能促进更多的心脏康复参与并改善心脏护理。几个因素可能有助于解释这种正相关关系,包括加强护理协调和基于价值的支付政策。需要进一步研究来评估综合模式与其他适当的高质量护理活动之间的关联。