Suppr超能文献

人格对噪声烦恼的影响及噪声与健康结果之间双向效应的纵向分析。

Longitudinal Analysis of the Influence of Personality on Noise Annoyance and Bidirectional Effects between Noise and Health Outcomes.

作者信息

Cassens Lion, van Cranenburgh Sander, Calvert Simeon, Kroesen Maarten

机构信息

Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Noise Health. 2025;27(124):80-88. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_107_24. Epub 2025 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-term noise annoyance can be expected to have worse outcomes than short-term annoyance. This study investigates noise annoyance over time, its association with personality traits and potential reciprocal effects between health outcomes and noise annoyance.

METHODS

Firstly, we conducted a Longitudinal Latent Class Analysis to identify noise annoyance profiles. We further analysed the effect of Big Five personality traits on the likelihood of belonging to these annoyance profiles. Secondly, we used Cross-lagged Panel Models to analyse whether changes in noise annoyance precede changes in health outcomes or vice versa. For both analyses, we used 8 years of data from the Dutch Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences (LISS) panel. Between 2708 and 11,068 subjects were included (this varies between models).

RESULTS

We found three profiles of noise annoyance, namely, chronically, occasionally and never annoyed. Among all participants, 12% were chronically annoyed by neighbour noise and 6% by street noise. Extraversion and emotional stability decreased the chance of belonging to the cluster of chronically annoyed, while openness had the opposite effect. Chronic noise annoyance showed a significant effect on self-reported heart complaints and sleeping problems, while the effects of noise annoyance profiles on high blood pressure and heart attacks were insignificant. Some potential indications for a reverse effect from health outcomes on noise annoyance were found.

CONCLUSION

Noise annoyance was relatively stable over time possibly because of its correlation with personality traits. Noise had a small negative effect on health outcomes, and some health outcomes affected noise annoyance. Further research should be conducted to collect dedicated panel data.

摘要

背景

长期噪音烦恼预计会比短期烦恼产生更糟糕的结果。本研究调查了随时间变化的噪音烦恼、其与人格特质的关联以及健康结果与噪音烦恼之间的潜在相互影响。

方法

首先,我们进行了纵向潜在类别分析以识别噪音烦恼类型。我们进一步分析了大五人格特质对属于这些烦恼类型可能性的影响。其次,我们使用交叉滞后面板模型来分析噪音烦恼的变化是否先于健康结果的变化,反之亦然。对于这两项分析,我们使用了来自荷兰社会科学纵向互联网研究(LISS)面板的8年数据。纳入了2708至11068名受试者(不同模型的受试者数量有所不同)。

结果

我们发现了三种噪音烦恼类型,即长期烦恼、偶尔烦恼和从不烦恼。在所有参与者中,12%的人长期受到邻居噪音的困扰,6%的人长期受到街道噪音的困扰。外向性和情绪稳定性降低了属于长期烦恼群体的可能性,而开放性则有相反的效果。长期噪音烦恼对自我报告的心脏问题和睡眠问题有显著影响,而噪音烦恼类型对高血压和心脏病发作的影响不显著。发现了一些健康结果对噪音烦恼产生反向影响的潜在迹象。

结论

噪音烦恼随时间相对稳定,可能是因为它与人格特质相关。噪音对健康结果有较小的负面影响,并且一些健康结果会影响噪音烦恼。应进行进一步研究以收集专门的面板数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d3f/11991129/caa9a69e2e15/NH-27-80-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验