Parikh Rajavi S, Grimsley Emily A, Anderson David O, Kendall Melissa A, Zander Tyler, Wolansky Rachel, Sujka Joseph, Kuo Paul C
From the Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (Parikh).
Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL (Grimsley, Kendall, Zander, Wolansky, Sujka, Kuo).
J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Apr 1;240(4):378-388. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001304. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
Academic surgery requires commitment beyond financial incentives. Nevertheless, the monetization of clinical effort measured by work relative value units (wRVUs) is not well characterized. Previous work indicates academic surgery charges a premium of 16% compared with nonacademic counterparts. In this study, we analyzed patterns in the valuation of academic and nonacademic work across general surgery subspecialties.
Medical Group Management Association datasets (calendar year 2014, 2018, and 2022) were queried for total cash compensation (TCC) and wRVU among colorectal (CR), general, surgical oncology, plastic and reconstructive, transplant, trauma, and vascular surgery. TCC, wRVU, and TCC per wRVU were compared between academic and nonacademic. ANOVA and t -test were used as appropriate; a p value of <0.05 was deemed statistically significant. Linear regression was used to perform trend analysis to evaluate TCC per wRVU over time by subspecialty.
TCC in all academic subspecialties was less than nonacademic at all years. wRVUs in academic subspecialties were greater than nonacademic at all years. TCC per wRVU in all academic subspecialties was less than nonacademic at all years. Differences between academic and nonacademic TCC per wRVU varied from -$36 of -52% (trauma surgery; p = 0.03) to +$4 of +6% (CR; p = ns). Trend analysis shows that the gap between academic and nonacademic TCC per wRVU in multiple GS subspecialties is widening.
Academic exacts a passion tax over nonacademic for virtually all GS subspecialties. As measured by TCC per wRVU, academic TR charges the highest tax (-52%; p = 0.03), followed by plastic and reconstructive surgery (-40%; p = 0.01), surgical oncology surgery (-27%; p = 0.02), vascular surgery (-12%; p = 0.02), transplant surgery (-10%; p = ns), and GS (-9%; p = 0.04). Only academic CR yields a positive "return" (+6%; p = ns). Embarking on a career in academic demands a passion for values that transcend financial gain.
学术外科需要的投入不仅仅是经济激励。然而,以工作相对价值单位(wRVUs)衡量的临床工作货币化情况尚未得到充分描述。先前的研究表明,学术外科与非学术外科相比,收费高出16%。在本研究中,我们分析了普通外科各亚专业中学术和非学术工作的估值模式。
查询了医疗集团管理协会数据集(2014年、2018年和2022年日历年度)中结直肠(CR)、普通、外科肿瘤学、整形与重建、移植、创伤和血管外科的总现金补偿(TCC)和wRVU。比较了学术和非学术之间的TCC、wRVU以及每wRVU的TCC。适当使用方差分析和t检验;p值<0.05被视为具有统计学意义。使用线性线性回归用于进行趋势分析,以按亚专业评估随时间变化的每wRVU的TCC。
所有年份中,所有学术亚专业的TCC均低于非学术亚专业。所有年份中,学术亚专业的wRVUs均高于非学术亚专业。所有年份中,所有学术亚专业每wRVU的TCC均低于非学术亚专业。学术和非学术每wRVU的TCC之间的差异从创伤外科的-$36(-52%;p = 0.03)到结直肠外科的+$4(+6%;p = 无统计学意义)不等。趋势分析表明,多个普通外科亚专业中学术和非学术每wRVU的TCC之间的差距正在扩大。
几乎所有普通外科亚专业中,学术外科相对于非学术外科都存在“热情税”。以每wRVU的TCC衡量,学术创伤外科收取的税最高(-52%;p = 0.03),其次是整形与重建外科(-40%;p = 0.01)、外科肿瘤学外科(-27%;p = 0.02)、血管外科(-12%;p = 0.02)、移植外科(-10%;p = 无统计学意义)和普通外科(-9%;p = 0.04)。只有学术结直肠外科产生了正“回报”(+6%;p = 无统计学意义)。投身学术生涯需要对超越经济利益的价值观充满热情。