Romeo B, Kervadec E, Fauvel B, Strika-Bruneau L, Amirouche A, Bezo Aurore, Piolino P, Benyamina A
APHP, Paul Brousse Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, Villejuif F-94800, France; Unité de Recherche Psychiatrie-Comorbidités-Addictions - PSYCOMADD - Paris Saclay University, Île-de-France, France.
APHP, Paul Brousse Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, Villejuif F-94800, France; Unité de Recherche Psychiatrie-Comorbidités-Addictions - PSYCOMADD - Paris Saclay University, Île-de-France, France.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2025 May;172:106086. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106086. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
Psychedelic-assisted therapies have demonstrated promising results in treating mental disorders, with results suggesting that the subjective intensity and quality of psychedelic experiences plays a significant role in mediating therapeutic effects. However, the strength of this association across diagnoses and treatment settings remains underexplored.
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO databases for studies examining the correlation between the intensity of the psychedelic experience and clinical outcomes in patients treated with classical psychedelics. Meta-correlations were performed, and standardized mean differences of psychedelic experience intensity scores were compared between clinical responders and non-responders using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on diagnosis, study design, setting (clinical vs. naturalistic), and substance used.
A significant positive correlation was found between the intensity of mystical experiences and clinical improvement across all studies (r = .33, p < .0001). Subgroup analyses revealed a stronger association (p = .02) for mood disorders (r = .41) compared to addictions (r = .19). The effect was greater (p < .01) in protocol-based clinical settings (r = .50) than in naturalistic use (r = .14). Prospective designs showed stronger (p < .01) correlations (r = .43) compared to retrospective designs (r = .14).
The intensity of psychedelic experiences is significantly and reliably associated with therapeutic outcomes, particularly in mood disorders. Clinical settings and prospective study designs strengthen this relationship, emphasizing the importance of controlled environments and therapeutic support to fully benefit from the therapeutic potential of psychedelics.
迷幻辅助疗法在治疗精神障碍方面已显示出有前景的结果,结果表明迷幻体验的主观强度和质量在介导治疗效果中起重要作用。然而,这种关联在不同诊断和治疗环境中的强度仍未得到充分探索。
我们在MEDLINE、Embase和PsycINFO数据库中搜索了研究,以检验经典迷幻药治疗患者的迷幻体验强度与临床结果之间的相关性。进行了元相关性分析,并使用随机效应模型比较了临床反应者和无反应者之间迷幻体验强度评分的标准化平均差异。根据诊断、研究设计、环境(临床与自然主义)和使用的物质进行亚组分析。
在所有研究中,神秘体验的强度与临床改善之间发现了显著的正相关(r = 0.33,p < 0.0001)。亚组分析显示,与成瘾(r = 0.19)相比,情绪障碍(r = 0.41)的关联更强(p = 0.02)。基于方案的临床环境中的效应(r = 0.50)比自然主义使用中的效应(r = 0.14)更大(p < 0.01)。前瞻性设计显示的相关性(r = 0.43)比回顾性设计(r = 0.14)更强(p < 0.01)。
迷幻体验的强度与治疗结果显著且可靠地相关,特别是在情绪障碍中。临床环境和前瞻性研究设计加强了这种关系,强调了可控环境和治疗支持对于充分受益于迷幻药治疗潜力的重要性。