• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助食管癌切除术中左喉返神经旁淋巴结清扫时CO2人工气胸与支气管封堵器的比较

Comparison of CO artificial pneumothoraces and bronchial blockers in lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve during robot-assisted esophagectomy.

作者信息

Jinyu Han, Kaiyuan Wang, Zhun Wang, Hui Yue, Xiaofeng Duan

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, 300060, China.

Department of Esophageal Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, 300060, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2534-2539. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11641-4. Epub 2025 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11641-4
PMID:40032664
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To analyze the effects of different intubation and ventilation modes on left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection and postoperative complications in patients undergoing robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).

METHODS

Overall, 339 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent RAMIE at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital between June 2017 and December 2021 were selected for this retrospective study. The effects of CO artificial pneumothorax and bronchial blockers on the number of lymph nodes dissected and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared.

RESULTS

Among 339 patients, 111 underwent surgery using CO artificial pneumothorax, while 228 used bronchial occlusion devices. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (p > 0.05). The total number of lymph nodes dissected (31.11 ± 13.00 vs. 24.42 ± 11.10, p < 0.001), the number of thoracic lymph nodes dissected (19.53 ± 9.80 vs. 15.00 ± 7.85, p < 0.001), and the number of lymph nodes dissected around the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (3.62 ± 3.19 vs. 2.72 ± 3.18, p = 0.015) were significantly higher in the bronchial occlusion group than in compared to the CO pneumothorax ventilation group. There were no significant differences in the number of right recurrent laryngeal lymph node dissection between the two groups (3.15 ± 2.89 vs. 2.68 ± 2.25, p = 0.132). The incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury was significantly lower in the bronchoclusive single-lung ventilation group than in the CO artificial pneumothorax group (15 [6.57%] vs. 17 [15.31%], p = 0.010). There were no significant differences in the incidence of overall postoperative complications, including pulmonary complications, anastomotic fistula, chylothorax, incision infection, or cardiovascular complications (all p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was noted in the Clavien-Dindo grading of postoperative complications (p = 0.016) and the number of days of hospitalization between the two groups (17.93 ± 9.98 vs. 14.48 ± 10.45, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The bronchial blocker, one-lung ventilation mode was found to be more advantageous in lymphadenectomies than the CO artificial pneumothorax, two-lung ventilation mode, given the reduced occurrence of related complications and length of hospitalization.

摘要

背景

分析不同插管和通气模式对机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术(RAMIE)患者左喉返神经淋巴结清扫及术后并发症的影响。

方法

本回顾性研究选取了2017年6月至2021年12月在天津医科大学肿瘤医院接受RAMIE的339例食管癌患者。比较二氧化碳人工气胸和支气管封堵器对清扫淋巴结数量及术后并发症发生率的影响。

结果

339例患者中,111例采用二氧化碳人工气胸进行手术,228例使用支气管封堵装置。两组患者的基线特征无显著差异(p>0.05)。支气管封堵组清扫的淋巴结总数(31.11±13.00 vs. 24.42±11.10,p<0.001)、胸段淋巴结清扫数(19.53±9.80 vs. 15.00±7.85,p<0.001)以及左喉返神经周围清扫的淋巴结数(3.62±3.19 vs. 2.72±3.18,p=0.015)均显著高于二氧化碳气胸通气组。两组右喉返神经淋巴结清扫数无显著差异(3.15±2.89 vs. 2.68±2.25,p=0.132)。支气管封堵单肺通气组喉返神经损伤发生率显著低于二氧化碳人工气胸组(15例[6.57%] vs. 17例[15.31%],p=0.010)。包括肺部并发症、吻合口瘘、乳糜胸、切口感染或心血管并发症在内的总体术后并发症发生率无显著差异(均p>0.05)。然而,两组术后并发症的Clavien-Dindo分级存在显著差异(p=0.016),住院天数也有显著差异(17.93±9.98 vs. 14.48±10.45,p=0.004)。

结论

发现支气管封堵单肺通气模式在淋巴结清扫方面比二氧化碳人工气胸双肺通气模式更具优势,相关并发症发生率更低,住院时间更短。

相似文献

1
Comparison of CO artificial pneumothoraces and bronchial blockers in lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve during robot-assisted esophagectomy.机器人辅助食管癌切除术中左喉返神经旁淋巴结清扫时CO2人工气胸与支气管封堵器的比较
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2534-2539. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11641-4. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.机器人辅助微创食管切除术在治疗食管鳞癌方面真的比电视辅助微创食管切除术具有淋巴结清扫优势吗?基于短期结果的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jul 1;32(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy110.
3
Multicentre randomized clinical trial on robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy (REVATE trial).多中心随机对照临床试验:机器人辅助与电视辅助胸腔镜食管切除术(REVATE 试验)。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jul 2;111(7). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae143.
4
Comparison of three-dimensional vs. two-dimensional assisted thoracoscopy for recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes dissection in esophagectomy: a retrospective study.三维与二维辅助胸腔镜在食管癌手术中喉返神经淋巴结清扫的比较:一项回顾性研究
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02576-z.
5
Prevention of intra-thoracic recurrent laryngeal nerve injury with robot-assisted esophagectomy.机器人辅助食管癌根治术中预防胸内喉返神经损伤。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Jun;405(4):533-540. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01904-0. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
6
[Application of artificial pneumothorax in semi-prone position to the video-assisted thoracic surgery of esophageal carcinoma].人工气胸在半卧位应用于食管癌电视胸腔镜手术
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;34(10):785-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.10.014.
7
Metastatic patterns of subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without neoadjuvant therapy.未经新辅助治疗的胸段食管鳞癌的隆突下、右和左喉返神经淋巴结转移模式。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 7;150(8):387. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05911-2.
8
Technique and surgical outcomes of mesenterization and intra-operative neural monitoring to reduce recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after thoracoscopic esophagectomy: A cohort study.胸腔镜食管切除术后肠系膜化和术中神经监测减少喉返神经麻痹的技术和手术结果:一项队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:301-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.738. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
9
Minimally invasive esophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection without recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis.微创食管切除术和根治性淋巴结清扫术,不伴喉返神经麻痹。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2749-2757. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07372-3. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
10
[Comparison of the lymph node dissection and complications between video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) esophagectomy and conventional esophagectomy via right thoracotomic].[电视辅助胸腔镜(VATS)食管癌切除术与经右胸切口传统食管癌切除术的淋巴结清扫及并发症比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2015 Jul;37(7):530-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Life Expectancy in Survivors of Esophageal Cancer Compared with the Background Population.食管癌幸存者与背景人群的预期寿命比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 May;29(5):2805-2811. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11416-4. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
3
Improvement of surgical complications using single-lumen endotracheal tube intubation and artificial carbon dioxide pneumothorax in esophagectomy: a meta-analysis.
单腔气管插管联合人工二氧化碳气胸在食管癌切除术中改善手术并发症的Meta分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Apr 21;16(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01459-1.
4
Postoperative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position: any anesthesia-related factor?微创俯卧位食管切除术的术后并发症:与麻醉相关的任何因素?
Tumori. 2021 Dec;107(6):525-535. doi: 10.1177/0300891620979358. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
5
Lymph node dissection around left recurrent laryngeal nerve: robot-assisted vs. video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.左喉返神经周围淋巴结清扫术:机器人辅助与视频辅助 McKeown 食管癌切除术治疗食管鳞癌。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6108-6116. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08105-2. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
6
Postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is associated with pneumonia in minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.术后喉返神经麻痹与食管癌微创食管切除术相关的肺炎有关。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Feb;35(2):837-844. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07455-1. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
7
Efficacy of artificial pneumothorax under two-lung ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer.人工气胸在双肺通气下用于食管癌电视辅助胸腔镜手术的疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Dec;34(12):5501-5507. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07347-z. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
8
Is two lung ventilation with artificial pneumothorax a better choice than one lung ventilation in minimally invasive esophagectomy?在微创食管切除术中,人工气胸下的双肺通气比单肺通气是更好的选择吗?
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(Suppl 5):S707-S712. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.08.
9
Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Yield on Overall Survival in Esophageal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.淋巴结获取数目对食管癌患者总生存预后价值的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):261-268. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002824.
10
A comparison between two lung ventilation with CO artificial pneumothorax and one lung ventilation during thoracic phase of minimally invasive esophagectomy.在微创食管切除术胸段手术期间,比较二氧化碳人工气胸下的两种肺通气与单肺通气。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1912-1918. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.150.