Jinyu Han, Kaiyuan Wang, Zhun Wang, Hui Yue, Xiaofeng Duan
Department of Anesthesiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Department of Esophageal Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2534-2539. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11641-4. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
To analyze the effects of different intubation and ventilation modes on left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection and postoperative complications in patients undergoing robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).
Overall, 339 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent RAMIE at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital between June 2017 and December 2021 were selected for this retrospective study. The effects of CO artificial pneumothorax and bronchial blockers on the number of lymph nodes dissected and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared.
Among 339 patients, 111 underwent surgery using CO artificial pneumothorax, while 228 used bronchial occlusion devices. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (p > 0.05). The total number of lymph nodes dissected (31.11 ± 13.00 vs. 24.42 ± 11.10, p < 0.001), the number of thoracic lymph nodes dissected (19.53 ± 9.80 vs. 15.00 ± 7.85, p < 0.001), and the number of lymph nodes dissected around the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (3.62 ± 3.19 vs. 2.72 ± 3.18, p = 0.015) were significantly higher in the bronchial occlusion group than in compared to the CO pneumothorax ventilation group. There were no significant differences in the number of right recurrent laryngeal lymph node dissection between the two groups (3.15 ± 2.89 vs. 2.68 ± 2.25, p = 0.132). The incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury was significantly lower in the bronchoclusive single-lung ventilation group than in the CO artificial pneumothorax group (15 [6.57%] vs. 17 [15.31%], p = 0.010). There were no significant differences in the incidence of overall postoperative complications, including pulmonary complications, anastomotic fistula, chylothorax, incision infection, or cardiovascular complications (all p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was noted in the Clavien-Dindo grading of postoperative complications (p = 0.016) and the number of days of hospitalization between the two groups (17.93 ± 9.98 vs. 14.48 ± 10.45, p = 0.004).
The bronchial blocker, one-lung ventilation mode was found to be more advantageous in lymphadenectomies than the CO artificial pneumothorax, two-lung ventilation mode, given the reduced occurrence of related complications and length of hospitalization.
分析不同插管和通气模式对机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术(RAMIE)患者左喉返神经淋巴结清扫及术后并发症的影响。
本回顾性研究选取了2017年6月至2021年12月在天津医科大学肿瘤医院接受RAMIE的339例食管癌患者。比较二氧化碳人工气胸和支气管封堵器对清扫淋巴结数量及术后并发症发生率的影响。
339例患者中,111例采用二氧化碳人工气胸进行手术,228例使用支气管封堵装置。两组患者的基线特征无显著差异(p>0.05)。支气管封堵组清扫的淋巴结总数(31.11±13.00 vs. 24.42±11.10,p<0.001)、胸段淋巴结清扫数(19.53±9.80 vs. 15.00±7.85,p<0.001)以及左喉返神经周围清扫的淋巴结数(3.62±3.19 vs. 2.72±3.18,p=0.015)均显著高于二氧化碳气胸通气组。两组右喉返神经淋巴结清扫数无显著差异(3.15±2.89 vs. 2.68±2.25,p=0.132)。支气管封堵单肺通气组喉返神经损伤发生率显著低于二氧化碳人工气胸组(15例[6.57%] vs. 17例[15.31%],p=0.010)。包括肺部并发症、吻合口瘘、乳糜胸、切口感染或心血管并发症在内的总体术后并发症发生率无显著差异(均p>0.05)。然而,两组术后并发症的Clavien-Dindo分级存在显著差异(p=0.016),住院天数也有显著差异(17.93±9.98 vs. 14.48±10.45,p=0.004)。
发现支气管封堵单肺通气模式在淋巴结清扫方面比二氧化碳人工气胸双肺通气模式更具优势,相关并发症发生率更低,住院时间更短。