Jin Chenxi, Fan Chenjing, Gong Yiwen, Huang Xinran, Li Shiqi, Liu Runhan, Guo Chunwei, Liu Yuxin
College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Jinpu Research Institute, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 3;15(1):7401. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90373-w.
China's manufacturing industry has been ranked as the most valuable in the world from 2010 to 2021. However, high-resolution manufacturing datasets are lacking, and this has precluded study of the survival rates and spatial changes in the manufacturing industry in China. Here, we analyzed spatial patterns of the manufacturing industry using point-of-interest (POI) data and a machine learning classification algorithm based on the Naive Bayes classifier. Using 2,780,266 POI data points in 2015 and 3,426,501 POI data points in 2019 covering the three major urban clusters in China, we classified the manufacturing industry data into seven categories: textile and garment (TC), mechatronics and equipment (ME), wood furniture (WF), agricultural and sideline product food processing (AF), metallurgical chemical industry and resource rough processing (MC), pharmaceutical manufacturing (PM), and papermaking culture (PP). The evolution of the manufacturing industry at the scale of 451 districts and counties in the urban clusters and the factors driving new entrants in the manufacturing industry were studied. The main conclusions were as follows. (1) Between 2015 and 2019, manufacturing activities in the three major urban clusters were highly concentrated in provincial capitals, municipalities under direct control of the central government, and their neighboring districts and counties with favorable economic conditions; incremental growth was concentrated in the core cities. (2) The survival rate of enterprises in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban cluster was relatively high, whereas that in the Pearl River Delta urban cluster was low. Enterprises in the PM industry had a relatively high survival rate, whereas those in the ME industry had a relatively low survival rate. (3) Analysis of the factors driving new entrants in the manufacturing industry indicates that the industrial foundation is the core factor affecting the entry of new manufacturing enterprises. Land transfer policies and high population density promote the development of the manufacturing industry, and regions with high per capita GDP and more research institutions tend to inhibit the development of the manufacturing industry. Further regressions showed that the effects of the proportion of the secondary industry in GDP, the number of development zones, and the number of research institutions on the different urban clusters varied. This paper provides strategic guidance for the future development of China's manufacturing industry, which will help the government and planning departments optimize the layout of the manufacturing industry, promote the development of the regional economy, and enhance the sustainability of the manufacturing industry.
2010年至2021年期间,中国制造业一直位居全球最具价值制造业榜首。然而,高分辨率制造业数据集的缺失,使得中国制造业的生存率和空间变化研究受到阻碍。在此,我们利用兴趣点(POI)数据和基于朴素贝叶斯分类器的机器学习分类算法,分析了制造业的空间格局。利用2015年的2780266个POI数据点和2019年的3426501个POI数据点,覆盖中国三大城市群,我们将制造业数据分为七类:纺织服装(TC)、机电与设备(ME)、木制家具(WF)、农副产品食品加工(AF)、冶金化工与资源粗加工(MC)、制药制造(PM)和造纸文化(PP)。研究了城市群中451个区县尺度下制造业的演变以及推动制造业新进入企业的因素。主要结论如下:(1)2015年至2019年期间,三大城市群的制造业活动高度集中在省会城市、直辖市及其经济条件良好的邻近区县;增量增长集中在核心城市。(2)京津冀城市群企业的生存率相对较高,而珠江三角洲城市群企业的生存率较低。PM行业的企业生存率相对较高,而ME行业的企业生存率相对较低。(3)对推动制造业新进入企业的因素分析表明,产业基础是影响新制造企业进入的核心因素。土地出让政策和高人口密度促进了制造业的发展,而人均GDP高和研究机构多的地区往往抑制制造业的发展。进一步回归分析表明,GDP中第二产业比重、开发区数量和研究机构数量对不同城市群的影响各不相同。本文为中国制造业的未来发展提供了战略指导,有助于政府和规划部门优化制造业布局,促进区域经济发展,增强制造业的可持续性。