• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习辅助阻抗光谱法检测产科肛门括约肌损伤:一项前瞻性、比较性、多中心临床研究。

Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries using machine learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy: a prospective, comparative, multicentre clinical study.

作者信息

Borycka Katarzyna, Młyńczak Marcel, Rosoł Maciej, Korzeniewski Kacper, Iwanowski Piotr, Heřman Hynek, Janku Petr, Uchman-Musielak Małgorzata, Dosedla Erik, Diaz Enrique Gonzalez, Sudoł-Szopińska Iwona, Mik Michał, Ratto Carlo, Spinelli Antonino

机构信息

OASIS Diagnostics, R&D of Medical Technology, Warsaw, Poland.

Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Lazarski University, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 4;15(1):7522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92392-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-92392-z
PMID:40033085
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11876446/
Abstract

To evaluate the clinical performance and safety of the ONIRY system for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) detection versus three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (EAUS). A prospective, comparative, multicentre, international study. Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, and Spain. 152 women between the first moments up to 8 weeks after vaginal delivery. Participants underwent EAUS and were allocated to groups based on OASIS classification: A (no perineal tear), B (1st or 2nd degree tear), or C (3rd or 4th degree, anal sphincters affected). Electric impedance was measured in the anal canal using the ONIRY system. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic outcome of impedance spectroscopy versus EAUS. Adverse events were collected. Part II involved in silico modelling and 10-time 10-fold cross-validation for automated analysis. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. 30 women were allocated to group A, 61 to group B, and 61 to group C. The diagnostic outcome was determined for 147 participants. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy were 87.0 ± 0.5%, 90.6 ± 2.0%, and 84.6 ± 1.9%, respectively, compared with EAUS. After data cleaning, the performance metrics of the proposed final ML model for ONIRY were: 90.0 ± 0.4%, 90.0 ± 1.2%, and 90.0 ± 0.7%, respectively. No adverse device effects or deficiencies were observed. By enabling early identification of sphincter injuries, ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy facilitates timely diagnosis and intervention, potentially reducing long-term complications such as faecal incontinence. Its rapid, bedside application in obstetric settings supports immediate postpartum care, complementing digital rectal examination and optimizing clinical decision-making.

摘要

评估用于检测产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)的ONIRY系统与三维经肛门超声(EAUS)相比的临床性能和安全性。一项前瞻性、比较性、多中心、国际研究。研究地点为波兰、捷克、斯洛伐克和西班牙。研究对象为152名在阴道分娩后至8周内的女性。参与者接受了EAUS检查,并根据OASIS分类被分配到不同组:A组(无会阴撕裂)、B组(1度或2度撕裂)或C组(3度或4度,肛门括约肌受累)。使用ONIRY系统测量肛管内的电阻抗。主要终点是阻抗光谱与EAUS的诊断结果。收集不良事件。第二部分涉及计算机模拟建模和10次10折交叉验证以进行自动分析。评估指标包括准确性、敏感性和特异性。30名女性被分配到A组,61名被分配到B组,61名被分配到C组。对147名参与者确定了诊断结果。与EAUS相比,机器学习辅助阻抗光谱的准确性、敏感性和特异性分别为87.0±0.5%、90.6±2.0%和84.6±1.9%。数据清理后,为ONIRY提出的最终机器学习模型的性能指标分别为90.0±0.4%、90.0±1.2%和90.0±0.7%。未观察到不良设备影响或缺陷。通过能够早期识别括约肌损伤,机器学习辅助阻抗光谱有助于及时诊断和干预,可能减少诸如大便失禁等长期并发症。其在产科环境中快速的床边应用支持产后即时护理,补充直肠指检并优化临床决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da96/11876446/51f4e02ccd48/41598_2025_92392_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da96/11876446/1edf0be640d3/41598_2025_92392_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da96/11876446/13ae886b23dc/41598_2025_92392_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da96/11876446/97c3e92a8673/41598_2025_92392_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da96/11876446/51f4e02ccd48/41598_2025_92392_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da96/11876446/1edf0be640d3/41598_2025_92392_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da96/11876446/13ae886b23dc/41598_2025_92392_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da96/11876446/97c3e92a8673/41598_2025_92392_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da96/11876446/51f4e02ccd48/41598_2025_92392_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries using machine learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy: a prospective, comparative, multicentre clinical study.使用机器学习辅助阻抗光谱法检测产科肛门括约肌损伤:一项前瞻性、比较性、多中心临床研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 4;15(1):7522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92392-z.
2
Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injury in the first and second vaginal delivery and after a cesarean delivery: development and validation of an intrapartal model.预测首次及第二次阴道分娩和剖宫产术后的产科肛门括约肌损伤:一种产时模型的建立与验证
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jul;183:111782. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111782. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
3
Predictive factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: systematic review and meta-analysis.初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;62(4):486-496. doi: 10.1002/uog.26292.
4
Anal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury: Is there a difference between subtypes? A systematic review.产科肛门括约肌损伤后肛门失禁:亚型之间有区别吗?系统评价。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Sep;42(7):1455-1469. doi: 10.1002/nau.25235. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
5
Neonatal head circumference as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新生儿头围作为产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Aug;5(8):101047. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101047. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
6
Use of endoanal ultrasound for reducing the risk of complications related to anal sphincter injury after vaginal birth.使用经肛门超声降低阴道分娩后肛门括约肌损伤相关并发症的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;2015(10):CD010826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010826.pub2.
7
The incidence of wound complications following primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤一期修复术后伤口并发症发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 May 10.
8
Care pathways and anorectal evaluation for obstetric anal sphincter injury-related incontinence: A UK survey of obstetricians.产科肛门括约肌损伤相关性尿失禁的护理路径与肛门直肠评估:英国产科医生调查
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul;27(7):e70140. doi: 10.1111/codi.70140.
9
Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury.产科肛门括约肌损伤的修复方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD002866. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002866.pub2.
10
Immersion in water during labour and birth.分娩过程中浸泡在水中。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 16;5(5):CD000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Urogynecologic Perspective on Detection and Diagnosis.产科肛门括约肌损伤:从泌尿妇科角度看检测与诊断
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06255-2.
2
Artificial Intelligence and Tacit Knowledge Integration in Midwifery: Policy Implications for Improving Healthcare Outcomes.助产领域中的人工智能与隐性知识整合:对改善医疗保健结果的政策启示
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70092. doi: 10.1111/inr.70092.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review and a meta-analysis on the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries during vaginal delivery.一项关于阴道分娩时产科肛门括约肌损伤发生率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Feb;26(2):227-242. doi: 10.1111/codi.16831. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
2
Management of Third and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears After Vaginal Birth. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/079, December 2020).阴道分娩后三度和四度会阴撕裂的管理。德国妇产科学会、奥地利妇产科学会和瑞士妇产科学会指南(S2k级别,德国医学科学院注册编号015/079,2020年12月)
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Dec 7;83(2):165-183. doi: 10.1055/a-1933-2647. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Underdiagnosis of internal anal sphincter trauma following vaginal delivery.
分娩后对内肛括约肌创伤的漏诊。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Feb;61(2):251-256. doi: 10.1002/uog.26049.
4
Use of endoanal ultrasound in detecting obstetric anal sphincter injury immediately after birth.经肛门超声在产后即刻检测产科肛门括约肌损伤中的应用。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Mar;102(3):389-395. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14514. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
5
Can transperineal ultrasound improve the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries?经会阴超声能否提高产科肛门括约肌损伤的诊断?
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Oct;33(10):2809-2814. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05290-7. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
6
Under-classified obstetric anal sphincter injuries.低位性产科肛门括约肌损伤。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jun;33(6):1473-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-05051-y. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
7
Residual Defects of the Anal Sphincter Complex Following Primary Repair of Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries at a Large Canadian Obstetrical Centre.大型加拿大产科中心产科肛门括约肌损伤一期修复术后肛门括约肌复合体残余缺陷。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 May;43(5):596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
8
Symptoms of fecal incontinence two decades after no, one, or two obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.排便失禁症状在无、一或二种产科肛门括约肌损伤 20 年后。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;224(3):276.e1-276.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.051. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
9
Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and anal incontinence: A meta-analysis.产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)与肛门失禁的风险:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:303-312. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.048. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
10
Correlations of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) grade, specific symptoms of anal incontinence, and measurements by endoanal and transperineal ultrasound.产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)分级、肛门失禁特定症状与经肛门和经会阴超声测量的相关性。
J Ultrasound. 2021 Sep;24(3):261-267. doi: 10.1007/s40477-020-00485-4. Epub 2020 May 31.