Lequin Mathilde, Colard Thomas, Colombo Antony, Le Cabec Adeline, Remy Floriane, Schuh Alexandra
Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, MCC, PACEA, UMR 5199, Pessac, France.
Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Lille, France.
Evol Anthropol. 2025 Mar;34(1):e70001. doi: 10.1002/evan.70001.
Unlike developmental biologists, paleoanthropologists primarily investigate development using skeletal remains, specifically fossilized and already-formed bones and teeth. Focusing on peri- and/or postnatal growth, they reconstruct development from fragmented "snapshots" of individual trajectories at various ontogenetic stages. These constraints prompt a discussion of what defines development versus growth, and its boundaries in studies of hominin evolution. We explore how paleoanthropologists address the limitations of the fossil record by using diverse methodological and theoretical frameworks to identify developmental markers despite missing data. Finally, we discuss the potential of the "Extended Evolutionary Synthesis," which calls for a greater focus on developmental processes in interpreting phenotypic variation in the fossil record.
与发育生物学家不同,古人类学家主要利用骨骼遗骸,特别是化石和已形成的骨骼与牙齿来研究发育。他们专注于出生前后的生长过程,从个体在不同个体发育阶段的碎片化“快照”中重建发育过程。这些限制引发了关于发育与生长的定义以及在人类进化研究中其界限的讨论。我们探讨了古人类学家如何通过使用多样的方法和理论框架来识别发育标记,尽管存在数据缺失的情况,但仍能应对化石记录的局限性。最后,我们讨论了“扩展进化综合论”的潜力,该理论呼吁在解释化石记录中的表型变异时更加关注发育过程。