Cox D J, Meyer R G
J Behav Med. 1978 Sep;1(3):297-310. doi: 10.1007/BF00846681.
Fourteen women with primary dysmenorrhea were administered four sessions of systematic desensitization (SD) by either a male or a female therapist. The following measures were taken during the flow periods before and after treatment and at a 6-month follow-up: menstrual symptom checklist, medication usage, invalid hours, and menstrual attitudes. At pretreatment, menstrually distressed women had significantly higher scores on all measures compared to a normative group and an explicitly nondistressed group. At posttreatment, treated women's scores on the dependent variables were significantly reduced. All indices were reduced to a "nondistressed level" at posttreatment and at 6-month follow-up. Type of dysmenorrhea (congestive vs. spasmodic), trait anxiety level, and therepist sex did not predict differential responsiveness to SD. SD did not affect frontailis EMG, peripheral blood flow, or pain threshold. A Retrospective Symptom Scale of menstrual distress was found to be highly reliable, valid, and sensitive.
14名原发性痛经女性由男性或女性治疗师进行了四个疗程的系统脱敏疗法(SD)。在治疗前后的经期以及6个月随访期间采取了以下措施:月经症状清单、药物使用情况、无效工作时间和月经态度。治疗前,与正常组和明确无痛苦组相比,月经困扰女性在所有测量指标上的得分显著更高。治疗后,接受治疗女性在因变量上的得分显著降低。在治疗后和6个月随访时,所有指标均降至“无痛苦水平”。痛经类型(充血性与痉挛性)、特质焦虑水平和治疗师性别并不能预测对系统脱敏疗法的不同反应。系统脱敏疗法未影响额肌肌电图、外周血流量或疼痛阈值。发现月经困扰回顾性症状量表具有高度可靠性、有效性和敏感性。