Ghandour Samir, Mercer Ronald W, Strahan James A, Bejarano-Pineda Lorena, Stewart Zachary E
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11472-w.
The diagnostic accuracy of US and MRI for identifying peroneal tendon tears is unknown. The aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of these modalities for the diagnosis of peroneal tendon tears.
Studies on diagnostic accuracy of MRI or US for peroneus brevis (PB) and/or longus pathology were searched in Scopus, EMBASE, and PubMed. Systematic review was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled diagnostic accuracy of MRI and US were calculated by using a bivariate random-effects model.
Twelve studies were included for analysis. Eight studies reported on MRI, three reported on US, and one study included both. Studies were all at a high risk of bias, with only one study satisfying at least two of the four risk-of-bias criteria. Reported accuracy data was heterogeneous for both MRI and US. For PB tear, US showed higher pooled sensitivity than MRI (US: 93%; 95% CI: 75%, 98%; MRI: 73%; 95% CI: 56%, 87%); and similar pooled specificity to MRI (US: 85%; 95% CI: 55%, 96%; MRI: 88%; 95% CI: 70%, 95%) For peroneus longus, US had high pooled sensitivity (94%; 95% CI: 71%, 99%) and specificity (94%; 95% CI: 79%, 98%), whereas MRI was similarly specific (91%; 95% CI: 76%, 97%) but less sensitive (60%; 95% CI: 35%, 85%).
US was observed to be sensitive and specific for peroneal tendon tears, while MRI was found to be specific but insensitive. The scarcity of literature addressing this question and the heterogeneity of the results precluded any confident conclusion of the superiority/inferiority of either modality.
Question Peroneal tendon tears are a common cause of lateral ankle pain, but the accuracy of MRI and US for identifying these tears is unknown. Finding Pooled data shows US to be both sensitive and specific and MRI to be specific and insensitive for peroneal tendon tears; however, the literature is scarce, at risk of bias, and results are inconsistent. Clinical relevance MRI and US are commonly utilized to assess lateral ankle pain. Though pooled-data suggests that US may be more sensitive, confident conclusion of the diagnostic accuracy of these modalities is limited by the level-of and quality-of the available evidence.
超声(US)和磁共振成像(MRI)用于识别腓骨肌腱撕裂的诊断准确性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定这些检查方式诊断腓骨肌腱撕裂的准确性。
在Scopus、EMBASE和PubMed数据库中检索关于MRI或US诊断腓骨短肌(PB)和/或腓骨长肌病变的准确性的研究。使用QUADAS-2工具进行系统评价。采用双变量随机效应模型计算MRI和US的合并诊断准确性。
纳入12项研究进行分析。8项研究报告了MRI,3项报告了US,1项研究同时包含两者。所有研究均存在较高的偏倚风险,只有1项研究满足四项偏倚风险标准中的至少两项。报告的MRI和US准确性数据均存在异质性。对于PB撕裂,US显示出比MRI更高的合并敏感度(US:93%;95%CI:75%,98%;MRI:73%;95%CI:56%,87%);与MRI的合并特异度相似(US:85%;95%CI:55%,96%;MRI:88%;95%CI:70%,95%)。对于腓骨长肌,US具有较高的合并敏感度(94%;95%CI:71%,99%)和特异度(94%;95%CI:79%,98%),而MRI的特异度相似(91%;95%CI:76%,97%)但敏感度较低(60%;95%CI:35%,85%)。
观察发现US对腓骨肌腱撕裂敏感且特异,而MRI特异但不敏感。针对该问题的文献稀缺且结果存在异质性,无法对任何一种检查方式的优越性/劣势得出可靠结论。
问题 腓骨肌腱撕裂是外侧踝关节疼痛的常见原因,但MRI和US识别这些撕裂的准确性尚不清楚。发现 合并数据显示US对腓骨肌腱撕裂敏感且特异,MRI特异但不敏感;然而,文献稀缺,存在偏倚风险,且结果不一致。临床意义 MRI和US常用于评估外侧踝关节疼痛。尽管合并数据表明US可能更敏感,但这些检查方式诊断准确性的可靠结论受到现有证据的水平和质量的限制。