Mües Hanna M, Markert Charlotte, Feneberg Anja C, Nater Urs M
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University Research Platform "The Stress of Life - Processes and Mechanisms Underlying Everyday Life Stress," University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf007.
The association between stress and sexuality, both of which are linked to health, is unclear. We examined the feasibility of an ecological momentary assessment study including time-based and event-based measurements in this context (aim 1) and investigated concurrent and time-lagged bidirectional associations between subjective stress and sexual desire/arousal/activity in the daily lives of healthy individuals over 14 days (aim 2).
The aim of this study was to gain insight into the interplay between stress and sexual experience and behavior while considering potential gender differences.
Between May 2015 and January 2016, 59 heterosexual, healthy men and women in relationships (M = 23.66 years old, SD = 2.86, range: 18-30 years) rated subjective stress, sexual desire, and sexual arousal at 6 fixed timepoints daily as well as after sexual activity. Feasibility was investigated considering dropout rates, missing data, and representativeness of data. Data were analyzed using mixed-effects models.
Higher subjective stress was associated with a lower likelihood of concurrent sexual desire and arousal, and occurrences of sexual desire and arousal were associated with lower concurrent subjective stress. Sexual desire and activity were associated with lower subsequent subjective stress, and the latter association was stronger in women than in men. Rates of dropout, missing data, and nonrepresentative data were low.
There appear to be bidirectional associations between higher subjective stress and a lower likelihood of concurrent sexual desire and arousal. Sexual desire and sexual activity seem to be associated with lower subsequent subjective stress. The study design appears to be feasible, although the generalizability of the findings is limited. Future studies might explore stress reduction interventions to promote sexual health.
压力与性取向之间的关联尚不清楚,而这两者均与健康相关。在此背景下,我们考察了一项生态瞬时评估研究的可行性,该研究包括基于时间和基于事件的测量(目标1),并调查了健康个体在14天日常生活中主观压力与性欲/性唤起/性行为之间的同步和时间滞后双向关联(目标2)。
本研究的目的是在考虑潜在性别差异的同时,深入了解压力与性体验及行为之间的相互作用。
2015年5月至2016年1月期间,59名处于恋爱关系中的异性恋健康男性和女性(平均年龄23.66岁,标准差2.86,范围:18 - 30岁)每天在6个固定时间点以及性行为后对主观压力、性欲和性唤起进行评分。从脱落率、缺失数据和数据代表性方面考察可行性。使用混合效应模型分析数据。
较高的主观压力与同步出现性欲和性唤起的可能性较低相关,而性欲和性唤起的出现与同步的较低主观压力相关。性欲和性行为与随后较低的主观压力相关,且后一种关联在女性中比在男性中更强。脱落率、缺失数据和非代表性数据的比例较低。
较高的主观压力与同步出现性欲和性唤起的可能性较低之间似乎存在双向关联。性欲和性行为似乎与随后较低的主观压力相关。该研究设计似乎可行,尽管研究结果的普遍性有限。未来的研究可能会探索减轻压力的干预措施以促进性健康。