Suppr超能文献

评估一种带有胸壁脉冲发生器的第二代肋间血管外植入式心脏复律除颤器导线用于感知、除颤和抗心动过速起搏的性能。

Evaluation of a second-generation intercostal extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead with a pectoral pulse generator for sensing, defibrillation, and anti-tachycardia pacing.

作者信息

Doshi Shephal K, Knops Reinoud E, Ebner Adrian, Husby Michael, Marcovecchio Alan, Sanghera Rick, Scheck Don, Burke Martin C

机构信息

Department of Electrophysiology, Pacific Heart Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Europace. 2025 Mar 5;27(3). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf044.

Abstract

AIMS

Intercostal extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (EV-ICD) leads may work better in contact with the pericardium thereby directing pacing and defibrillation energy towards excitable myocytes. We report 3-month safety and performance outcomes with a second-generation intercostal EV-ICD lead paired with standard, commercially available ICD pulse generators (PGs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Subjects undergoing a transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) procedure received a concomitant intercostal EV-ICD lead system. The intercostal EV-ICD lead was connected sequentially to a PG in a left pectoral and then a left mid-axillary location. Extravascular ICD lead assessment included sensing and defibrillation of induced ventricular arrhythmias and pacing capture. The intercostal EV-ICD system was followed in a 'recording-only' mode and the control TV-ICD system in 'therapy delivery' mode to compare stored events. Devices were evaluated prior to hospital discharge, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months post-implant. Defibrillation testing was repeated prior to lead removal; 20/20 (100%) were successfully implanted (median implant time of 9 min). Two major lead complications were reported over a mean of 82 days: (i) lead movement and (ii) infection of both the TV-ICD and EV-ICD systems. Intraoperative pacing capture was achieved with the integrated bipolar configuration in 19 of 20 (95%) subjects. Pacing capture with the EV-ICD system was tolerated in all subjects, with over 90% feeling no pain after a 1-month recovery from the procedure. Induced VF episodes were sensed in all subjects and defibrillated successfully in 17 of 17 patients (100%) with a left mid-axillary PG and 19 of 20 patients (95%) with a left pectoral PG. Sensing and defibrillation were successful in 18 of 18 (100%) tested prior to lead removal.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot experience with a second-generation intercostal EV-ICD lead implantation, sensing and defibrillation of induced VF were successful when paired with a standard ICD PG from either a left mid-axillary or pectoral pocket.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT number: NCT05791032; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05791032.

摘要

目的

肋间血管外植入式心律转复除颤器(EV-ICD)导线与心包接触时可能效果更好,从而将起搏和除颤能量导向可兴奋的心肌细胞。我们报告了第二代肋间EV-ICD导线与标准的市售ICD脉冲发生器(PG)配对使用3个月的安全性和性能结果。

方法和结果

接受经静脉ICD(TV-ICD)手术的受试者同时接受了肋间EV-ICD导线系统。肋间EV-ICD导线依次连接到左胸和左腋中线位置的PG。血管外ICD导线评估包括对诱发的室性心律失常的感知和除颤以及起搏夺获。肋间EV-ICD系统以“仅记录”模式进行随访,对照TV-ICD系统以“治疗递送”模式进行随访以比较存储的事件。在出院前、植入后2周、1个月、2个月和3个月对设备进行评估。在拔除导线前重复进行除颤测试;20例(100%)均成功植入(中位植入时间为9分钟)。在平均82天内报告了2例主要导线并发症:(i)导线移位和(ii)TV-ICD和EV-ICD系统均发生感染。20例受试者中有19例(95%)通过集成双极配置在术中实现了起搏夺获。所有受试者均耐受EV-ICD系统的起搏夺获,术后1个月恢复后,超过90%的人没有疼痛感觉。所有受试者均能感知诱发的室颤发作,17例患者中有17例(100%)使用左腋中线PG成功除颤,20例患者中有19例(95%)使用左胸PG成功除颤。在拔除导线前进行测试的18例(100%)中,感知和除颤均成功。

结论

在这项第二代肋间EV-ICD导线植入的初步经验中,当与来自左腋中线或胸袋的标准ICD PG配对时,诱发室颤的感知和除颤均成功。

临床试验注册

NCT编号:NCT05791032;网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05791032

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/973f/11928788/640b0af230ef/euaf044_ga.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验