Suppr超能文献

解读全氟和多氟烷基物质的作用模式:人肝球状体中的比较基因表达分析

Deciphering per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances mode of action: comparative gene expression analysis in human liver spheroids.

作者信息

Rowan-Carroll Andrea, Meier Matthew J, Yauk Carole L, Williams Andrew, Leingartner Karen, Bradford Lauren, Lorusso Luigi, Atlas Ella

机构信息

Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch (HECSB), Health Canada, Ottawa, ON K1S 0K9, Canada.

Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.

出版信息

Toxicol Sci. 2025 May 1;205(1):124-142. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaf023.

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms by which environmental chemicals cause toxicity is necessary for effective human health risk assessment. High-throughput transcriptomics (HTTr) can be used to inform risk assessment on toxicological mechanisms, hazards, and potencies. We applied HTTr to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) cause liver perturbations. We contrasted transcriptomic profiles of PFOA, PFBS, PFOS, and PFDS against transcriptomic profiles from established liver-toxic and non-toxic reference compounds, alongside peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) agonists. Our analysis was conducted on metabolically competent 3-D human liver spheroids produced from primary cells from 10 donors. Pathway analysis showed that PFOS and PFDS perturb many of the same pathways as the known liver-toxic compounds in the spheroids, and that the cholesterol biosynthesis pathways are significantly affected by exposure to these compounds. PFOA alters lipid metabolism-related pathways but its expression profile does not closely match reference compounds. PFBS upregulates many degradation-related pathways and targets many of the same pathways as the PPAR agonists and acetaminophen. Our transcriptional analysis does not support the claim that these PFAS are DNA-damaging in this model. A multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis revealed that PFOS, PFOA, and PFDS cluster together in the same multidimensional space as liver-damaging compounds, whereas PFBS clusters more closely with the non-liver-damaging compounds. Benchmark concentration-response modeling predicts that all the PFAS are bioactive in the liver. Overall, our results show that these PFAS produce unique transcriptional changes but also alter pathways associated with established liver-toxic chemicals in this liver spheroid model.

摘要

了解环境化学物质导致毒性的机制对于有效的人类健康风险评估至关重要。高通量转录组学(HTTr)可用于为毒理学机制、危害和效力的风险评估提供信息。我们应用HTTr来阐明全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)导致肝脏扰动的分子机制。我们将全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟丁烷磺酸(PFBS)、全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)和全氟癸烷磺酸(PFDS)的转录组谱与已确定的肝脏毒性和非毒性参考化合物以及过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体(PPARs)激动剂的转录组谱进行了对比。我们的分析是在由10名供体的原代细胞产生的具有代谢活性的三维人肝脏球体上进行的。通路分析表明,PFOS和PFDS扰乱了球体中许多与已知肝脏毒性化合物相同的通路,并且胆固醇生物合成通路受到这些化合物暴露的显著影响。PFOA改变了与脂质代谢相关的通路,但其表达谱与参考化合物不太匹配。PFBS上调了许多与降解相关的通路,并靶向了许多与PPAR激动剂和对乙酰氨基酚相同的通路。我们的转录分析不支持这些PFAS在该模型中具有DNA损伤作用的说法。多维标度(MDS)分析表明,PFOS、PFOA和PFDS在与肝脏损伤化合物相同的多维空间中聚集在一起,而PFBS与非肝脏损伤化合物的聚集更为紧密。基准浓度-反应模型预测所有PFAS在肝脏中都具有生物活性。总体而言,我们的结果表明,这些PFAS产生了独特的转录变化,但也改变了该肝脏球体模型中与已确定的肝脏毒性化学物质相关的通路。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验