Odell William, Alexander Swetha, Maheshwari Narinder, Danve Abhijeet
W. Odell, BS, A. Danve, MD, MHS, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
S. Alexander, MD, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.
J Rheumatol. 2025 Jul 1;52(7):669-677. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0552.
We surveyed physicians in the United States to assess knowledge, awareness, and attitudes toward axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The objective was to identify barriers for referral and opportunities for intervention to reduce diagnostic delay of axSpA.
An online questionnaire was distributed nationwide to nonrheumatology physicians (NRPs) serving patients with chronic back pain (CBP), namely in family/internal medicine, spine surgery/orthopedics, pain management, physical medicine/rehabilitation, and to rheumatologists as the comparator group.
Seven hundred fifty physicians completed the survey (response rate 24%). The majority of NRPs were familiar with inflammatory back pain (IBP); 87% could identify > 4 of 8 IBP items, but only 41% routinely assess for IBP in practice. NRPs screen patients for axSpA risk factors ≤ 50% of the time. NRPs order C-reactive protein and HLA-B27 tests significantly less often, and antinuclear antibodies and rheumatoid factor tests significantly more often than rheumatologists in patients with CBP. Only 50% of NRPs correctly answered sacroiliac/pelvic radiograph as the correct initial imaging test, and 37% correctly selected magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis as the next imaging test. Unfamiliarity with the terms axSpA and nonradiographic axSpA was reported by 11% and 35% of NRPs, respectively, and NRPs less often consider axSpA as a possible diagnosis in patients with CBP. Formal referral guidelines for patients with suspected axSpA were felt to be important by NRPs and rheumatologists alike.
There is a substantial lack of knowledge and awareness about nomenclature, laboratory testing, and proper imaging of axSpA among NRPs. Unnecessary laboratory tests are commonly ordered by NRPs and rheumatologists. Formal referral guidelines and improved education may help reduce diagnostic delay of axSpA.
我们对美国的医生进行了调查,以评估他们对轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)的知识、认识和态度。目的是确定转诊障碍和干预机会,以减少axSpA的诊断延迟。
在全国范围内向为慢性背痛(CBP)患者提供服务的非风湿病医生(NRP)发放在线问卷,这些医生来自家庭/内科、脊柱外科/骨科、疼痛管理、物理医学/康复科,同时将风湿病医生作为对照组。
750名医生完成了调查(回复率24%)。大多数NRP熟悉炎性背痛(IBP);87%能够识别出8项IBP项目中的4项以上,但只有41%在实际工作中常规评估IBP。NRP对axSpA危险因素的筛查率≤50%。在CBP患者中,NRP开具C反应蛋白和HLA-B27检测的频率明显低于风湿病医生,而开具抗核抗体和类风湿因子检测的频率明显高于风湿病医生。只有50%的NRP正确回答骶髂关节/骨盆X线片是正确的初始影像学检查,37%正确选择骨盆磁共振成像作为下一步影像学检查。分别有11%和35%的NRP报告不熟悉axSpA和非放射学axSpA这两个术语,并且NRP较少将axSpA视为CBP患者的可能诊断。NRP和风湿病医生都认为疑似axSpA患者的正式转诊指南很重要。
NRP对axSpA的命名、实验室检测和正确影像学检查的知识和认识严重不足。NRP和风湿病医生通常会开具不必要的实验室检查。正式的转诊指南和改进教育可能有助于减少axSpA的诊断延迟。