Koc Gonul Hazal, Looijen Agnes E M, van der Horst-Bruinsma Irene E, de Jong Pascal H P
G.H. Koc, MD, A.E.M. Looijen, MD, P.H.P. de Jong, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam;
G.H. Koc, MD, A.E.M. Looijen, MD, P.H.P. de Jong, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam.
J Rheumatol. 2025 Jun 1;52(6):553-562. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-1258.
The disease course and burden of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may differ between female and male individuals, but existing data on these differences are limited and often contradictory. Therefore, we investigated whether clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) differ between female and male patients with RA over time.
All female (n = 286) and male (n = 139) patients with RA according to 1987 and/or 2010 criteria from Treatment in the Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort (tREACH), a stratified single-blinded trial with a treat-to-target (T2T) approach and fixed medication protocol, were included. Clinical outcomes include disease activity, medication usage, sustained disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-free remission (SDFR), and radiographic progression. In addition, the following PROs were investigated: general health, pain, functional ability, health-related quality of life, fatigue, productivity loss, and a possible depression or anxiety disorder. For comparisons over time, a mixed model or Cox proportional hazard model was used. The mixed models were adjusted for age, initial treatment, and disease activity (Disease Activity Score in 44 joints [DAS44]).
Female patients had a higher DAS44 over time compared to male patients (β 0.36, 95% CI 0.25-0.47, < 0.001), which also resulted in more treatment adjustments including use of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs; 36% vs 24%, < 0.001). Although not significant, first bDMARD survival seemed shorter in female patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.4, 95% CI 0.8-2.6, = 0.24). However, no differences were found in SDFR and radiographic progression. With regard to PROs, only functional ability differed significantly between sexes after adjusting for confounders, including disease activity (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, β 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.17, < 0.001).
Clinical outcomes and PROs are intertwined, and both improve with a T2T management approach. Nevertheless, female patients with RA have higher disease activity, a greater need for bDMARDs-although these have lower efficacy-and more functional impairment over time, underscoring the need for sex-specific management recommendations. (Trial registration number: ISRCTN26791028).
类风湿关节炎(RA)的病程和负担在女性和男性个体中可能有所不同,但关于这些差异的现有数据有限且常常相互矛盾。因此,我们研究了随着时间推移,女性和男性RA患者的临床结局和患者报告结局(PROs)是否存在差异。
纳入鹿特丹早期关节炎队列(tREACH)中所有根据1987年和/或2010年标准诊断的女性(n = 286)和男性(n = 139)RA患者,这是一项采用达标治疗(T2T)方法和固定用药方案的分层单盲试验。临床结局包括疾病活动度、药物使用情况、持续的无改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARD)缓解(SDFR)和影像学进展。此外,还研究了以下PROs:总体健康状况、疼痛、功能能力、健康相关生活质量、疲劳、生产力损失以及可能的抑郁或焦虑障碍。为了进行随时间的比较,使用了混合模型或Cox比例风险模型。混合模型针对年龄、初始治疗和疾病活动度(44个关节疾病活动评分 [DAS44])进行了调整。
随着时间推移,女性患者的DAS44高于男性患者(β 0.36,95% CI 0.25 - 0.47,P < 0.001),这也导致了更多的治疗调整,包括使用生物DMARDs(bDMARDs;36%对24%,P < 0.001)。尽管不显著,但女性患者首次使用bDMARD的生存期似乎较短(风险比 [HR] 1.4,95% CI 0.8 - 2.6,P = 0.24)。然而,在SDFR和影像学进展方面未发现差异。关于PROs,在调整混杂因素(包括疾病活动度)后,仅功能能力在性别之间存在显著差异(健康评估问卷 - 残疾指数,β 0.10,95% CI 0.04 - 0.17,P < 0.001)。
临床结局和PROs相互交织,并且通过T2T管理方法两者均得到改善。尽管如此,随着时间推移,女性RA患者具有更高的疾病活动度,对bDMARDs有更大需求——尽管其疗效较低——并且功能损害更大,这突出了针对特定性别的管理建议的必要性。(试验注册号:ISRCTN26791028)