• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米诺环素低剂量制剂口服DFD-29治疗酒渣鼻的疗效、安全性及耐受性:两项3期随机临床试验

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral DFD-29, a Low-Dose Formulation of Minocycline, in Rosacea: Two Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Bhatia Neal, Del Rosso James, Stein Gold Linda, Lain Edward, Draelos Zoe Diana, Sidgiddi Srinivas

机构信息

Therapeutics Clinical Research, San Diego, California.

JDR Dermatology Research, Las Vegas, Nevada.

出版信息

JAMA Dermatol. 2025 May 1;161(5):499-507. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.6542.

DOI:10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.6542
PMID:40042869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11883608/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A low-dose modified formulation of minocycline hydrochloride, DFD-29, is under evaluation for treating papulopustular rosacea (PPR).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of DFD-29, 40 mg, compared with doxycycline, 40 mg, and placebo for treating PPR.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study included data from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 randomized clinical trials (MVOR-1 and MVOR-2) conducted between March 2022 and May 2023 at 61 centers in the US and Germany. Healthy adults 18 years and older with moderate to severe PPR were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized 3:3:2 to oral DFD-29 (minocycline hydrochloride capsules), 40 mg; doxycycline, 40 mg; or placebo once daily for 16 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The coprimary efficacy outcomes were (1) proportion of participants with Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) treatment success with DFD-29 vs placebo and (2) total inflammatory lesion count reductions with DFD-29 vs placebo. Secondary outcomes included comparisons between DFD-29 and doxycycline in coprimary outcomes and between DFD-29 and placebo in erythema reduction.

RESULTS

Of 653 participants enrolled, 323 were randomized in MVOR-1 (247 [76.5%] women; mean [SD] age, 47.2 [13.7] years) and 330 were randomized in MVOR-2 (249 [75.5%] women; mean [SD] age, 51.6 [14.0] years). DFD-29 demonstrated superior efficacy in IGA success rates compared with placebo (MVOR-1: treatment difference [TD], 32.9%; 95% CI, 19.6-46.2; P < .001; MVOR-2: TD, 34.1%; 95% CI, 21.3-46.8; P < .001) and compared with doxycycline (MVOR-1: TD, 18.0%; 95% CI, 5.0-31.1; P = .01; MVOR-2: TD, 28.3%; 95% CI, 17.4-39.3; P < .001). DFD-29 also showed superior efficacy in least-squares mean reductions in total inflammatory lesions vs placebo (MVOR-1: TD, -9.2; 95% CI, -11.5 to -6.9; P < .001; MVOR-2: TD, -6.8; 95% CI, -8.9 to -4.8; P < .001) and doxycycline (MVOR-1: TD, -4.7; 95% CI, -6.7 to -2.8; P < .001; MVOR-2: TD, -3.5; 95% CI, -5.4 to -1.6; P < .001). Adverse events with DFD-29, doxycycline, and placebo were reported in 32 of 121 (26.4%), 25 of 116 (21.6%), and 27 of 76 (35.5%), respectively, in MVOR-1 and 51 of 122 (41.8%), 40 of 121 (33.1%), and 30 of 82 (36.6%), respectively, in MVOR-2. The most common adverse events with DFD-29, doxycycline, and placebo were nasopharyngitis, reported in 4 of 121 (3.3%), 2 of 116 (1.7%), and 3 of 76 (3.9%), respectively, in MVOR-1 and 13 of 122 (10.7%), 10 of 121 (8.3%), and 13 of 82 (15.9%), respectively, in MVOR-2, and COVID-19, reported in 4 of 121 (3.3%), 3 of 116 (2.6%), and 4 of 76 (5.3%) in MVOR-1 and 7 of 122 (5.7%), 8 of 121 (6.6%), and 5 of 82 (6.1%) in MVOR-2.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, DFD-29 was superior in efficacy to both doxycycline and placebo and demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit profile in the treatment of PPR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT05296629 and NCT05343455.

摘要

引言

低剂量改良型盐酸米诺环素制剂DFD-29正在接受治疗丘疹脓疱型玫瑰痤疮(PPR)的评估。

目的

确定40毫克DFD-29与40毫克多西环素及安慰剂治疗PPR的疗效和安全性。

设计、地点和参与者:本研究纳入了2022年3月至2023年5月在美国和德国61个中心进行的2项双盲、安慰剂对照、3期随机临床试验(MVOR-1和MVOR-2)的数据。纳入了年龄在18岁及以上的中度至重度PPR健康成年人。

干预措施

参与者按3:3:2随机分组,分别口服40毫克DFD-29(盐酸米诺环素胶囊)、40毫克多西环素或安慰剂,每日1次,共16周。

主要结局和测量指标

共同主要疗效结局为:(1)DFD-29与安慰剂相比,达到研究者整体评估(IGA)治疗成功的参与者比例;(2)DFD-29与安慰剂相比,总炎性皮损计数的减少情况。次要结局包括DFD-29与多西环素在共同主要结局方面的比较,以及DFD-29与安慰剂在红斑减轻方面的比较。

结果

在653名纳入的参与者中,323人在MVOR-1中随机分组(247名[76.5%]女性;平均[标准差]年龄,47.2[13.7]岁),330人在MVOR-2中随机分组(249名[75.5%]女性;平均[标准差]年龄,51.6[14.0]岁)。与安慰剂相比,DFD-29在IGA成功率方面显示出更高的疗效(MVOR-1:治疗差异[TD],32.9%;95%置信区间,19.6 - 46.2;P < .001;MVOR-2:TD,34.1%;95%置信区间,21.3 - 46.8;P < .001),与多西环素相比也更高(MVOR-1:TD,18.0%;95%置信区间,5.0 - 31.1;P = .01;MVOR-2:TD,28.3%;95%置信区间,17.4 - 39.3;P < .001)。与安慰剂相比,DFD-29在总炎性皮损的最小二乘均值减少方面也显示出更高的疗效(MVOR-1:TD,-9.2;95%置信区间,-11.5至-6.9;P < .001;MVOR-2:TD,-6.8;95%置信区间,-8.9至-4.8;P < .001),与多西环素相比同样如此(MVOR-1:TD,-4.7;95%置信区间,-6.7至-2.8;P < .001;MVOR-2:TD,-3.5;95%置信区间,-5.4至-1.6;P < .001)。在MVOR-1中,DFD-29、多西环素和安慰剂的不良事件报告率分别为121例中的32例(26.4%)、116例中的25例(21.6%)和76例中的27例(35.5%),在MVOR-2中分别为122例中的51例(41.8%)、121例中的40例(33.1%)和82例中的30例(36.6%)。DFD-29、多西环素和安慰剂最常见的不良事件是鼻咽炎,在MVOR-1中分别为121例中的4例(3.3%)、116例中的2例(1.7%)和76例中的3例(3.9%),在MVOR-2中分别为122例中的13例(10.7%)、121例中的10例(8.3%)和82例中的13例(15.9%),以及COVID-19,在MVOR-1中分别为121例中的4例(3.3%)、116例中的3例(2.6%)和76例中的4例(5.3%) 在MVOR-2中分别为122例中的7例(5.7%)、121例中的8例(6.6%)和82例中的5例(6.1%)。

结论与意义

在本研究中,DFD-29在疗效上优于多西环素和安慰剂,在治疗PPR方面显示出良好的风险效益比。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05296629和NCT05343455。

相似文献

1
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral DFD-29, a Low-Dose Formulation of Minocycline, in Rosacea: Two Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.米诺环素低剂量制剂口服DFD-29治疗酒渣鼻的疗效、安全性及耐受性:两项3期随机临床试验
JAMA Dermatol. 2025 May 1;161(5):499-507. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.6542.
2
Minocycline Extended-Release Comparison with Doxycycline for the Treatment of Rosacea: A Randomized, Head-to-Head, Clinical Trial.米诺环素缓释剂与多西环素治疗酒渣鼻的比较:一项随机、直接比较的临床试验。
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2021 Dec;14(12):16-23.
3
DOMINO, doxycycline 40 mg vs. minocycline 100 mg in the treatment of rosacea: a randomized, single-blinded, noninferiority trial, comparing efficacy and safety.多西环素 40mg 与米诺环素 100mg 治疗酒渣鼻的随机、单盲、非劣效性试验:比较疗效和安全性。
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Jun;176(6):1465-1474. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15155. Epub 2017 May 8.
4
Interventions for rosacea.酒渣鼻的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 28;2015(4):CD003262. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003262.pub5.
5
Oral Sarecycline for Treatment of Papulopustular Rosacea: Results of a Pilot Study of Effectiveness and Safety.口腔沙雷菌素治疗丘疹脓疱性酒渣鼻:疗效和安全性的初步研究结果。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2021 Apr 1;20(4):426-431. doi: 10.36849/JDD.2021.5923.
6
A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of a Topical Minocycline Foam, FMX103, for the Treatment of Facial Papulopustular Rosacea.一项评估局部用米诺环素泡沫剂 FMX103 治疗面部丘疹脓疱性酒渣鼻的安全性、耐受性和疗效的 II 期、随机、双盲临床研究。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018 Jun;19(3):427-436. doi: 10.1007/s40257-017-0339-0.
7
Minocycline 1.5% foam for the topical treatment of moderate to severe papulopustular rosacea: Results of 2 phase 3, randomized, clinical trials.米诺环素 1.5%泡沫剂治疗中重度丘疹脓疱性酒渣鼻的疗效:两项 3 期随机临床试验结果。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 May;82(5):1166-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.01.043. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
An open-label, community-based, 12-week assessment of the effectiveness and safety of monotherapy with doxycycline 40 mg (30-mg immediate-release and 10-mg delayed-release beads).一项基于社区的开放标签研究,对40毫克强力霉素(30毫克速释珠和10毫克缓释珠)单药治疗的有效性和安全性进行为期12周的评估。
Cutis. 2010 Nov;86(5 Suppl):7-15.
9
A randomized phase 3b/4 study to evaluate concomitant use of topical ivermectin 1% cream and doxycycline 40-mg modified-release capsules, versus topical ivermectin 1% cream and placebo in the treatment of severe rosacea.一项评估伊维菌素 1%乳膏和多西环素 40mg 缓释胶囊与伊维菌素 1%乳膏和安慰剂联合治疗严重酒渣鼻的随机 3b/4 期研究。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Feb;82(2):336-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.05.063. Epub 2019 May 29.
10
Effectiveness and safety of doxycycline 40 mg (30-mg immediate-release and 10-mg delayed-release beads) once daily as add-on therapy to existing topical regimens for the treatment of papulopustular rosacea: results from a community-based trial.多西环素40毫克(30毫克速释珠和10毫克缓释珠)每日一次作为现有局部治疗方案的附加疗法用于治疗丘疹脓疱型玫瑰痤疮的有效性和安全性:一项基于社区的试验结果
Cutis. 2010 Nov;86(5 Suppl):16-25.

本文引用的文献

1
Minocycline Extended-Release Comparison with Doxycycline for the Treatment of Rosacea: A Randomized, Head-to-Head, Clinical Trial.米诺环素缓释剂与多西环素治疗酒渣鼻的比较:一项随机、直接比较的临床试验。
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2021 Dec;14(12):16-23.
2
Alterations of human skin microbiome and expansion of antimicrobial resistance after systemic antibiotics.全身用抗生素后人类皮肤微生物组的改变和抗菌药物耐药性的扩展。
Sci Transl Med. 2021 Dec 22;13(625):eabd8077. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abd8077.
3
Nonantibiotic Properties of Tetracyclines in Rosacea and Their Clinical Implications.四环素在酒渣鼻治疗中的非抗生素特性及其临床意义
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2021 Aug;14(8):14-21. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
4
A Review of Systemic Minocycline Side Effects and Topical Minocycline as a Safer Alternative for Treating Acne and Rosacea.系统性米诺环素副作用综述以及外用米诺环素作为治疗痤疮和玫瑰痤疮的更安全替代方案
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;10(7):757. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10070757.
5
Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel.玫瑰痤疮诊断、分类和管理建议:2019 年全球玫瑰痤疮共识专家组更新。
Br J Dermatol. 2020 May;182(5):1269-1276. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18420. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
6
Update on the Management of Rosacea from the American Acne & Rosacea Society (AARS).美国痤疮与酒渣鼻协会(AARS)发布的酒渣鼻管理最新情况。
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2019 Jun;12(6):17-24. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
7
Incidence and prevalence of rosacea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.酒渣鼻的发病率和患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Aug;179(2):282-289. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16481. Epub 2018 May 31.
8
Minocycline affects human neutrophil respiratory burst and transendothelial migration.米诺环素影响人中性粒细胞呼吸爆发和跨内皮迁移。
Inflamm Res. 2017 Feb;66(2):107-109. doi: 10.1007/s00011-016-0999-x. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
9
Topical Ivermectin 10 mg/g and Oral Doxycycline 40 mg Modified-Release: Current Evidence on the Complementary Use of Anti-Inflammatory Rosacea Treatments.局部用伊维菌素10mg/g和口服多西环素40mg缓释剂:抗炎性酒渣鼻治疗联合使用的当前证据
Adv Ther. 2016 Sep;33(9):1481-501. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0380-z. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
10
Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris.寻常痤疮治疗的指南。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 May;74(5):945-73.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.037. Epub 2016 Feb 17.