Ghirotto Luca, Paci Eugenio, Bricci Claudia, Marini Silvia, Bessi Valentina, Díaz Crescitelli Matías Eduardo, Rondini Ermanno, Pistelli Francesco, Gorini Giuseppe, Bosi Sandra, Giorgi Rossi Paolo
Qualitative Research Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Italian League Against Cancer (LILT), Florence, Italy.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 5;20(3):e0318732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318732. eCollection 2025.
Lung cancer screening (LCS) combined with smoking cessation programs is a critical strategy for reducing lung cancer mortality. Understanding the perspectives of cigarette users and former ones on these interventions is essential for enhancing their acceptability and effectiveness. This study aimed to explore, in Italy, the perceptions and experiences of individuals eligible for LCS within the context of a smoking cessation program.
This multicenter qualitative study was conducted in two Italian regions as part of a larger project the Italian League against Cancer promoted. Using purposive sampling, we included (a) cigarette users and former ones who participated in an Italian trial, ITALUNG study, and (b) cigarette users who had been offered individual or group smoking cessation interventions and were theoretically eligible for screening in the following years (aged 50-70, ≥15 pack-years). Data were collected through open-ended semi-structured interviews and focus group meetings and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The data analysis yielded six themes covering participants' views on the interactions between the two types of interventions (screening and smoking cessation program). Across their data, we generated the following themes: (i) depreciation and fatalism toward the risk of smoking, (ii) self-blaming and ethicality, (iii) ambivalent impact of the screening on smoking, (iv) LCS-related information and concerns, (v) teachable and motivating moments, and (vi) non-stigmatizing communication and testimony by professionals.
Our study underscores the importance of avoiding stigma and respecting the dignity of cigarette users in implementing LCS and smoking cessation programs. Clear communication and supportive interactions with healthcare providers are crucial for enhancing the acceptability and effectiveness of these interventions. Future research should focus on quantifying these findings and exploring additional factors influencing the acceptability and effectiveness of combined LCS and smoking cessation programs.
肺癌筛查(LCS)与戒烟计划相结合是降低肺癌死亡率的关键策略。了解吸烟者和既往吸烟者对这些干预措施的看法对于提高其可接受性和有效性至关重要。本研究旨在探讨在意大利,符合肺癌筛查条件的个体在戒烟计划背景下的认知和经历。
这项多中心定性研究在意大利的两个地区进行,是意大利抗癌联盟推动的一个更大项目的一部分。采用目的抽样法,我们纳入了:(a)参与意大利试验“ITALUNG研究”的吸烟者和既往吸烟者;(b)接受过个体或团体戒烟干预且理论上在接下来几年符合筛查条件(年龄50 - 70岁,吸烟量≥15包年)的吸烟者。通过开放式半结构化访谈和焦点小组会议收集数据,并使用反思性主题分析法进行分析。数据分析产生了六个主题,涵盖了参与者对两种干预措施(筛查和戒烟计划)之间相互作用的看法。在他们的数据中,我们得出了以下主题:(i)对吸烟风险的轻视和宿命论;(ii)自责与道德性;(iii)筛查对吸烟的矛盾影响;(iv)与肺癌筛查相关的信息和担忧;(v)可教导和激励的时刻;(vi)专业人员的无污名化沟通和见证。
我们的研究强调了在实施肺癌筛查和戒烟计划时避免污名化和尊重吸烟者尊严的重要性。与医疗保健提供者进行清晰的沟通和支持性互动对于提高这些干预措施的可接受性和有效性至关重要。未来的研究应侧重于对这些发现进行量化,并探索影响肺癌筛查与戒烟联合计划可接受性和有效性的其他因素。