Jeffries Mark, Abuzour Aseel S M, Ashcroft Darren, Avery Tony, Langridge Mark, Francis Gayle, O'Brien Amber, Millington Tracy, Keers Richard Neil
Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
Division of Population Health, Heatlh Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 5;15(3):e086309. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086309.
Patients residing in prisons are a vulnerable group with more complex health needs and higher prevalence of inappropriate prescribing than the general population. Overcrowding in prisons, inadequate staffing levels, diversion of medication and substance misuse present challenges to prison healthcare. Interventions that use prescribing safety indicators are one way of helping to reduce the risk of harm by identifying patients at risk of potentially hazardous prescribing. This qualitative study aimed to understand the implementation and impact of a suite of seven prescribing safety indicators, specifically developed for use in prison settings, as part of a multi-disciplinary intervention.
Semistructured interviews were conducted with a range of prison healthcare staff across 30 different prison sites in England. In addition, an online survey was made available to all healthcare staff in participating prisons. Data analysis of interview transcripts and free-text survey responses was conducted following a thematic approach and informed by normalisation process theory.
Interviews were conducted with 9 prison healthcare staff and 40 completed the survey, with 18 staff providing free-text responses.
Three themes were interpreted from the data: bringing people together and establishing individual and collective roles that facilitated implementation of the intervention; developing new tasks, work processes and practices to make the intervention work in everyday practice; and seeing the benefits and value of the intervention and new work processes within the context of prison healthcare provision.
New work processes and practices were instigated in order to implement the intervention, often fitting into existing medication safety practices, building on other prescribing work and creating learning across the team. While we found that prison staff reported challenges to implementation, similar interventions may be used for prescribing safety in prison settings.
与普通人群相比,监狱中的患者是弱势群体,有更复杂的健康需求,不适当处方的患病率更高。监狱过度拥挤、人员配备不足、药物挪用和药物滥用给监狱医疗保健带来了挑战。使用处方安全指标的干预措施是通过识别有潜在危险处方风险的患者来帮助降低伤害风险的一种方式。这项定性研究旨在了解一套专门为监狱环境开发的七个处方安全指标作为多学科干预措施的一部分的实施情况和影响。
对英格兰30个不同监狱地点的一系列监狱医疗保健人员进行了半结构化访谈。此外,还向参与监狱的所有医疗保健人员提供了在线调查。对访谈记录和自由文本调查回复进行数据分析时采用了主题方法,并以规范化过程理论为依据。
与9名监狱医疗保健人员进行了访谈,40人完成了调查,18名工作人员提供了自由文本回复。
从数据中解读出三个主题:让人们团结起来,确立个人和集体角色以促进干预措施的实施;开发新任务、工作流程和实践,使干预措施在日常实践中发挥作用;在监狱医疗保健提供的背景下看到干预措施和新工作流程的益处和价值。
为了实施干预措施,启动了新的工作流程和实践,这些通常融入现有的药物安全实践中,以其他处方工作为基础,并在团队中创造学习机会。虽然我们发现监狱工作人员报告了实施方面的挑战,但类似的干预措施可用于监狱环境中的处方安全。