• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发与评估牙科事件报告系统:一种以用户为中心的风险管理方法。

Developing and evaluating a dental incident reporting system: a user-centered approach to risk management.

作者信息

Siriwatana Kiti, Pongpanich Sathirakorn

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

College of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05729-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05729-5
PMID:40045296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11881495/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient safety is critical in healthcare, and adverse events (AEs) in dental care require tailored reporting systems for accurate documentation and risk management. Generalized systems fail to address the unique needs of dentistry, necessitating a specialized approach. This study introduces the dental incident reporting system (DIRS), a user-centered framework designed to overcome the barriers in dental incident reporting.

METHODS

This mixed-methods study was conducted in three phases. Phase 1 involved the development of a comprehensive classification system for dental AEs using 752 patient safety incidents reported over 5 years at the Dental Hospital, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University. Phase 2 involved the design and refinement of the DIRS, integrating features such as automated risk assessment and classification assistance, validated through heuristic evaluations. Phase 3 comprised usability testing with 16 end users using the system usability scale (SUS) and user acceptance test (UAT) to assess perceived effectiveness, usefulness, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

The classification system categorized dental-specific AEs, aligning with the hospital accreditation standards. The DIRS achieved a mean SUS score of 69.7, indicating above-average usability. The UAT showed high user ratings for effectiveness (mean, 3.15; SD, 0.49), usefulness (mean, 3.15; SD, 0.51), and satisfaction (mean, 3.38; SD, 0.48). Strong reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.81-0.96) was demonstrated across the evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

The DIRS addresses gaps in dental incident reporting by offering a user-friendly, standardized system. Its potential to enhance reporting accuracy and foster a culture of transparency highlights its significance for improving dental patient safety. Future efforts should focus on refining usability, expanding testing, and exploring scalability for broader adoption.

摘要

背景

患者安全在医疗保健中至关重要,牙科护理中的不良事件(AE)需要量身定制的报告系统以进行准确记录和风险管理。通用系统无法满足牙科的独特需求,因此需要一种专门的方法。本研究引入了牙科事件报告系统(DIRS),这是一个以用户为中心的框架,旨在克服牙科事件报告中的障碍。

方法

这项混合方法研究分三个阶段进行。第1阶段涉及使用朱拉隆功大学牙科学院牙科医院5年期间报告的752起患者安全事件,开发一个全面的牙科AE分类系统。第2阶段涉及DIRS的设计和完善,整合诸如自动风险评估和分类辅助等功能,并通过启发式评估进行验证。第3阶段包括对16名最终用户进行可用性测试,使用系统可用性量表(SUS)和用户接受度测试(UAT)来评估感知的有效性、有用性和满意度。

结果

该分类系统对特定于牙科的AE进行了分类,符合医院认证标准。DIRS的平均SUS得分为69.7,表明可用性高于平均水平。UAT显示用户对有效性(平均3.15;标准差0.49)、有用性(平均3.15;标准差0.51)和满意度(平均3.38;标准差0.48)的评分很高。各项评估均显示出很强的可靠性(组内相关系数为0.91;95%置信区间为0.81 - 0.96)。

结论

DIRS通过提供一个用户友好的标准化系统,解决了牙科事件报告中的差距。它提高报告准确性和培养透明度文化的潜力凸显了其对改善牙科患者安全的重要性。未来的工作应侧重于优化可用性、扩大测试范围以及探索可扩展性以实现更广泛的采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9269/11881495/788c1e613ea5/12903_2025_5729_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9269/11881495/321e08747c0b/12903_2025_5729_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9269/11881495/80e0e79a97a8/12903_2025_5729_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9269/11881495/03ec88e61996/12903_2025_5729_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9269/11881495/788c1e613ea5/12903_2025_5729_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9269/11881495/321e08747c0b/12903_2025_5729_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9269/11881495/80e0e79a97a8/12903_2025_5729_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9269/11881495/03ec88e61996/12903_2025_5729_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9269/11881495/788c1e613ea5/12903_2025_5729_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing and evaluating a dental incident reporting system: a user-centered approach to risk management.开发与评估牙科事件报告系统:一种以用户为中心的风险管理方法。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05729-5.
2
A 5-Year retrospective analysis of adverse events in dentistry at the Dental Hospital, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University.朱拉隆功大学牙科学院牙科医院不良事件的 5 年回顾性分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 26;24(1):1294. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05034-7.
3
Co-Designing, Developing, and Testing a Mental Health Platform for Young People Using a Participatory Design Methodology in Colombia: Mixed Methods Study.在哥伦比亚运用参与式设计方法共同设计、开发和测试一个针对年轻人的心理健康平台:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 6;12:e66558. doi: 10.2196/66558.
4
Usability Testing of a Digital Assessment Routing Tool for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Iterative, Convergent Mixed Methods Study.肌肉骨骼疾病数字评估路由工具的可用性测试:迭代、趋同混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 30;24(8):e38352. doi: 10.2196/38352.
5
ReachCare Mobile Apps for Patients Experiencing Suicidality in the Emergency Department: Development and Usability Testing Using Mixed Methods.急诊科有自杀倾向患者的ReachCare移动应用程序:采用混合方法进行开发和可用性测试
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jan 27;7:e41422. doi: 10.2196/41422.
6
A User-Centered Design Approach for a Screening App for People With Cognitive Impairment (digiDEM-SCREEN): Development and Usability Study.一种针对认知障碍患者的筛查应用程序(digiDEM-SCREEN)的以用户为中心的设计方法:开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jan 22;12:e65022. doi: 10.2196/65022.
7
Exploring Usability of a Clinical Decision Support System for Cancer Care: A User-Centered Study.探索癌症护理临床决策支持系统的可用性:一项以用户为中心的研究。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025 Mar;8(3):e70173. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70173.
8
A Smart Glass Telemedicine Application for Prehospital Communication: User-Centered Design Study.一种用于院前通信的智能眼镜远程医疗应用:以用户为中心的设计研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 29;26:e53157. doi: 10.2196/53157.
9
Toward a human-centered voluntary medical incident reporting system.迈向以人为主导的自愿医疗事件报告系统。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 1):729-33.
10
Developing a user-centered voluntary medical incident reporting system.开发以用户为中心的自愿医疗事件报告系统。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 1):203-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Streamlining incident reporting system: A lean approach to enhance patient and staff safety in a Middle Eastern prehospital emergency care setting.简化事件报告系统:一种精益方法,以提高中东院前急救环境中的患者和工作人员安全。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2025 Jan;44(3):5-14. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21589. Epub 2025 Jan 5.
2
A 5-Year retrospective analysis of adverse events in dentistry at the Dental Hospital, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University.朱拉隆功大学牙科学院牙科医院不良事件的 5 年回顾性分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 26;24(1):1294. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05034-7.
3
The Nature of Adverse Events in Dentistry.
牙科不良事件的本质。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Oct 1;20(7):454-460. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001255. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
4
Barriers to Incident Reporting by Physicians: A Survey of Surgical Residents and Attending Physicians.医生事件报告的障碍:外科住院医师和主治医生的调查
Cureus. 2024 Jun 21;16(6):e62850. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62850. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Critical airway-related incidents and near misses in anaesthesia: a qualitative study of a critical incident reporting system.麻醉相关危急气道事件和险兆事件:对一个危急事件报告系统的定性研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Aug;133(2):371-379. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.04.052. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
6
Perceptions of U.S. and U.K. Incident Reporting Systems: A Scoping Review.美国和英国不良事件报告系统认知的范围综述。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Aug 1;20(5):360-369. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001231. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
7
Development of a scoring system to quantify errors from semantic characteristics in incident reports.开发一种评分系统,以量化事件报告中语义特征的错误。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Apr 19;31(1):e100935. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100935.
8
Patient Satisfaction in Dental Healthcare Settings at Saudi Ministry of Health: A Descriptive Study.沙特卫生部牙科保健机构中的患者满意度:一项描述性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Sep 25;17:2377-2383. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S419978. eCollection 2023.
9
Comparison of physicians' and dentists' incident reports in open data from the Japan Council for Quality Health Care: a mixed-method study.比较来自日本医疗品质促进机构公开资料中医生和牙医的不良事件报告:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Feb 2;23(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02749-x.
10
Nationwide survey on Japanese residents' experience with and barriers to incident reporting.全国范围内对日本居民事件报告经历和障碍的调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278615. eCollection 2022.