Suppr超能文献

因渐强型短暂性脑缺血发作行紧急颈动脉内膜切除术。

Urgent carotid endarterectomy for crescendo transient ischemic attack.

作者信息

Gajin Predrag, Petrovic Jovan, Pesic Slobodan, Atanasijevic Igor, Babic Aleksandar, Neskovic Mihailo, Dabic Petar, Babic Srdjan, Matic Predrag, Tanaskovic Slobodan, Ilijevski Nenad

机构信息

Vascular Surgery Clinic, Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje", Belgrade, Serbia.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Vasa. 2025 Jul;54(4):259-264. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a001188. Epub 2025 Mar 6.

Abstract

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a widely accepted treatment to mitigate stroke risk in patients with severe carotid stenosis. The timing of CEA, especially in cases of acute neurological symptoms like crescendo transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke-in-evolution, remains contentious. This study evaluates the effectiveness of urgent CEA (UCEA) within 6 hours of crescendo TIA onset compared to elective CEA (ECEA) performed within 2 weeks in preventing recurrent stroke. This retrospective study analyzed 87 patients with crescendo TIA treated with UCEA and compared them with a matched control group of 174 patients who underwent ECEA for symptomatic carotid disease. All patients underwent preoperative multidetector computed tomography angiography. Primary outcomes included mortality, stroke, TIA, and major adverse cardiac events within 30 days and up to 6 months postoperatively. The UCEA group demonstrated no postoperative strokes or TIAs, with a low complication rate. UCEA resulted in one stroke within 6 months, with complete recovery. The ECEA group experienced one stroke and one death. There were no significant differences in early postoperative complications between the groups. However, the UCEA group exhibited a higher overall mortality rate (4.6% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.044), predominantly due to myocardial infarction. Both groups demonstrated comparable outcomes regarding postoperative complications and carotid restenosis at follow-up. UCEA performed within six hours of crescendo TIA shows comparable perioperative outcomes to ECEA in preventing recurrent strokes. While these findings suggest early intervention with UCEA may be a viable approach for patients with crescendo TIA, significant methodological limitations preclude definitive conclusions about safety and efficacy.

摘要

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)是一种被广泛接受的治疗方法,用于降低重度颈动脉狭窄患者的中风风险。CEA的手术时机,尤其是在出现如渐强性短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和进展性中风等急性神经症状的情况下,仍然存在争议。本研究评估了在渐强性TIA发作后6小时内进行紧急CEA(UCEA)与在2周内进行择期CEA(ECEA)相比,在预防复发性中风方面的有效性。这项回顾性研究分析了87例接受UCEA治疗的渐强性TIA患者,并将他们与174例因有症状颈动脉疾病接受ECEA治疗的匹配对照组进行比较。所有患者术前均接受多排螺旋CT血管造影。主要结局包括术后30天内及术后6个月内的死亡率、中风、TIA和主要不良心脏事件。UCEA组术后未出现中风或TIA,并发症发生率较低。UCEA导致6个月内出现1例中风,患者完全康复。ECEA组发生1例中风和1例死亡。两组术后早期并发症无显著差异。然而,UCEA组的总体死亡率较高(4.6%对0.6%;p = 0.044),主要原因是心肌梗死。两组在随访时的术后并发症和颈动脉再狭窄方面显示出相似的结果。在渐强性TIA发作后6小时内进行的UCEA在预防复发性中风方面显示出与ECEA相当的围手术期结局。虽然这些发现表明对渐强性TIA患者进行早期干预采用UCEA可能是一种可行的方法,但显著的方法学局限性妨碍了对安全性和有效性得出明确结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验