Zhong Sheng, Zhang Fengtao, Zhang Haiming, Hu Honglei, Zeng Quan, Li Yangyang, Wei Qiming
Department of Tumor and Vascular Intervention, DongGuan Tungwah Hospital, DongGuan, Guangdong, 523000, People's Republic of China.
Vascular Interventional Surgery, Shenzhen Nanshan People's Hospital (Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, People's Republic of China.
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2025 Mar 1;12:445-458. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S506457. eCollection 2025.
Previous LAUNCH trial revealed the promising effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, most intermediate-stage HCC exceeds the up-to-seven criteria, limiting their potential TACE benefits. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) was widely endorsed for delivering substantial survival benefits for high tumor burden HCC, outperforming TACE. Accordingly, we undertook this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with HAIC plus lenvatinib for intermediate-stage HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria.
From June 2017 to November 2021, clinical data of intermediate-stage HCC patients beyond up-to-seven criteria received TACE combined with HAIC plus lenvatinib or TACE alone from four medical centers in China were retrospectively collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability weighting (IPTW) were applied to balance baseline differences. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized for survival analysis. Cox regression-based multivariate analysis was used to identify survival-related risk factors. We compare tumor response and the incidence of adverse reactions between groups.
A total of 294 intermediate-stage HCC patients beyond up-to-seven criteria received TACE combined with HAIC plus lenvatinib (the TACEHL group, n = 127) or TACE monotherapy (the TACE group, n = 167) were finally enrolled. Following propensity matching, the median OS and median PFS in the TACEHL group were 34.6 months and 15.7 months, respectively, significantly higher than the 15.7 months and 6.9 months observed in the TACE group. In tumor response, the ORR was 71.4% in the TACEHL group and 30.8% in the TACE group (P < 0.001), the DCR was 92.3% in the TACEHL group and 75.8% in the TACE group (P = 0.005). The 3-4 grade adverse reactions were comparable between the groups.
For intermediate-stage HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria, the integration of TACE and HAIC plus lenvatinib therapy demonstrated substantial enhancements in survival prognosis, which is a promising treatment regimen.
先前的LAUNCH试验显示,经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合乐伐替尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)具有良好疗效。然而,大多数中期HCC超过了“up-to-seven”标准,限制了TACE对其潜在益处。肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)因能为高肿瘤负荷的HCC带来显著生存获益而被广泛认可,其疗效优于TACE。因此,我们开展本研究以评估TACE联合HAIC加乐伐替尼治疗超过“up-to-seven”标准的中期HCC的疗效和安全性。
回顾性收集2017年6月至2021年11月期间,来自中国四个医疗中心的超过“up-to-seven”标准的中期HCC患者接受TACE联合HAIC加乐伐替尼或单纯TACE治疗的临床资料。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和逆概率加权(IPTW)来平衡基线差异。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析。基于Cox回归的多变量分析用于确定生存相关危险因素。我们比较了两组之间的肿瘤反应和不良反应发生率。
最终纳入294例超过“up-to-seven”标准的中期HCC患者,其中接受TACE联合HAIC加乐伐替尼治疗的患者(TACEHL组,n = 127)和接受单纯TACE治疗的患者(TACE组,n = 167)。倾向匹配后,TACEHL组的中位总生存期(OS)和中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为34.6个月和15.7个月,显著高于TACE组的15.7个月和6.9个月。在肿瘤反应方面,TACEHL组的客观缓解率(ORR)为71.4%,TACE组为30.8%(P < 0.001),疾病控制率(DCR)在TACEHL组为92.3%,在TACE组为75.8%(P = 0.005)。两组3 - 4级不良反应相当。
对于超过“up-to-seven”标准的中期HCC,TACE联合HAIC加乐伐替尼治疗在生存预后方面有显著改善,是一种有前景的治疗方案。