• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者更倾向于人类精神科医生而非聊天机器人:一项横断面研究。

Patients prefer human psychiatrists over chatbots: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Arbanas Goran, Periša Ante, Biliškov Ivan, Sušac Jelena, Badurina Mirela, Arbanas Dahna

机构信息

Goran Arbanas, Vrapče University Psychiatric Hospital, Bolnička cesta 32, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia, goran.arbanas@bolnica-vrapce .hr.

出版信息

Croat Med J. 2025 Feb 28;66(1):13-19. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2025.66.13.

DOI:10.3325/cmj.2025.66.13
PMID:40047157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11947973/
Abstract

AIM

To rate the level of patients' satisfaction with responses on questions regarding mental health provided by human psychiatrists, pharmacists, and chatbot platforms.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study enrolled 89 patients who were pharmacologically treated for their mental disorder in one institution in Croatia and one in Bosnia and Herzegovina during October 2023. They asked psychiatrists, pharmacists, ChatGPT, and one Croatian chatbot questions about their mental disorder and medications and rated the satisfaction with the responses.

RESULTS

Almost half of the patients had used ChatGPT before the study, and only 12.4% had used the Croatian platform. The patients were most satisfied with the information provided by psychiatrists (4.67 out of 5 about mental disorder and 4.51 about medications), followed by pharmacists (3.94 about medications), ChatGPT (3.66 about mental disorder and 3.45 about medications), and the Croatian platform (3.66 about mental disorder and 3.44 about medications). Almost half of the participants believed it was easier for them to put a question to a psychiatrist than to a chatbot, and only 10% claimed it was easier to ask ChatGPT.

CONCLUSION

Patients with mental health disorders were more satisfied with responses from their psychiatrists than from chatbots, and satisfaction with chatbots' knowledge on mental disorders and medications was still too low to justify their usage in these patients.

摘要

目的

评估患者对人类精神科医生、药剂师和聊天机器人平台就心理健康问题所给出回复的满意度。

方法

这项横断面研究纳入了2023年10月期间在克罗地亚的一家机构和波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的一家机构接受精神疾病药物治疗的89名患者。他们向精神科医生、药剂师、ChatGPT和一个克罗地亚聊天机器人询问有关其精神疾病和药物的问题,并对回复的满意度进行评分。

结果

近一半的患者在研究前使用过ChatGPT,只有12.4%的患者使用过克罗地亚平台。患者对精神科医生提供的信息最满意(关于精神疾病的评分为4.67分(满分5分),关于药物的评分为4.51分),其次是药剂师(关于药物的评分为3.94分)、ChatGPT(关于精神疾病的评分为3.66分,关于药物的评分为3.45分)和克罗地亚平台(关于精神疾病的评分为3.66分,关于药物的评分为3.44分)。近一半的参与者认为向精神科医生提问比向聊天机器人提问更容易,只有10%的人声称向ChatGPT提问更容易。

结论

患有精神健康障碍的患者对精神科医生的回复比对聊天机器人的回复更满意,并且对聊天机器人在精神疾病和药物方面知识的满意度仍然过低,不足以证明在这些患者中使用它们是合理的。

相似文献

1
Patients prefer human psychiatrists over chatbots: a cross-sectional study.患者更倾向于人类精神科医生而非聊天机器人:一项横断面研究。
Croat Med J. 2025 Feb 28;66(1):13-19. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2025.66.13.
2
Putting ChatGPT's Medical Advice to the (Turing) Test: Survey Study.对ChatGPT的医学建议进行(图灵)测试:调查研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Jul 10;9:e46939. doi: 10.2196/46939.
3
Psychiatrists' experiences and opinions of generative artificial intelligence in mental healthcare: An online mixed methods survey.精神科医生在精神卫生保健中对生成式人工智能的体验与看法:一项在线混合方法调查。
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Mar;333:115724. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115724. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
Knowledge and use, perceptions of benefits and limitations of artificial intelligence chatbots among Italian physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional national study.意大利物理治疗专业学生对人工智能聊天机器人的了解与使用、对其益处和局限性的认知:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07176-w.
5
Accuracy of Prospective Assessments of 4 Large Language Model Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions About Emergency Care: Experimental Comparative Study.前瞻性评估 4 种大型语言模型聊天机器人对患者关于急救护理问题的回答的准确性:实验性对比研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 4;26:e60291. doi: 10.2196/60291.
6
Can ChatGPT and Gemini justify brain CT referrals? A comparative study with human experts and a custom prediction model.ChatGPT和Gemini能否证明脑部CT转诊的合理性?与人类专家和定制预测模型的比较研究。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2025 Feb 18;9(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41747-025-00569-y.
7
WHAT DO PATIENTS THINK ABOUT PSYCHIATRIST'S ATTIRE? A CROATIAN STUDY.患者如何看待精神科医生的着装?一项克罗地亚的研究。
Acta Clin Croat. 2024 Apr;63(1):115-122. doi: 10.20471/acc.2024.63.01.14.
8
The promising role of chatbots in keratorefractive surgery patient education.聊天机器人在角膜屈光手术患者教育中的潜在作用。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2025 Feb;48(2):104381. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2024.104381. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
9
Gender difference on patients' satisfaction and expectation towards mental health care.患者对精神卫生保健的满意度和期望方面的性别差异。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2013 Jul-Sep;16(3):285-91. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.113448.
10
A Comparison of Prostate Cancer Screening Information Quality on Standard and Advanced Versions of ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot: A Cross-Sectional Study.ChatGPT标准版本与高级版本、谷歌Gemini和微软Copilot上前列腺癌筛查信息质量的比较:一项横断面研究。
Am J Health Promot. 2025 Jun;39(5):766-776. doi: 10.1177/08901171251316371. Epub 2025 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients prefer human psychiatrists over chatbots: a letter to the editor.患者更喜欢人类精神科医生而非聊天机器人:致编辑的一封信。
Croat Med J. 2025 May 7;66(2):179. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2025.66.179.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing Advanced AI Ecosystems to Enhance Diagnosis and Care for Patients with Depression.开发先进的人工智能生态系统以加强对抑郁症患者的诊断和护理。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 Oct 20;309:18-22. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230731.
2
The performance of ChatGPT in generating answers to clinical questions in psychiatry: a two-layer assessment.ChatGPT在生成精神科临床问题答案方面的表现:双层评估。
World Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;22(3):479-480. doi: 10.1002/wps.21145.
3
The now and future of ChatGPT and GPT in psychiatry.ChatGPT 和 GPT 在精神病学中的现在和未来。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Nov;77(11):592-596. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13588. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
4
ChatGPT and Bard exhibit spontaneous citation fabrication during psychiatry literature search.ChatGPT 和 Bard 在搜索精神病学文献时会自发编造引文。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Aug;326:115334. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115334. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
5
Chat-GPT: Opportunities and Challenges in Child Mental Healthcare.Chat-GPT:儿童心理保健中的机遇与挑战。
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Jul-Aug;39(4):1191-1193. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.4.8118.
6
Putting ChatGPT's Medical Advice to the (Turing) Test: Survey Study.对ChatGPT的医学建议进行(图灵)测试:调查研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Jul 10;9:e46939. doi: 10.2196/46939.
7
ChatGPT and social psychiatry: A commentary on the article 'Old dog, new tricks? Exploring the potential functionalities of ChatGPT in supporting educational methods in social psychiatry'.ChatGPT与社会精神病学:对《老狗学新招?探索ChatGPT在支持社会精神病学教育方法方面的潜在功能》一文的评论
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;70(7):1335-1336. doi: 10.1177/00207640231178488. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
8
ChatGPT use in teaching social psychiatry.ChatGPT在社会精神病学教学中的应用。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;70(7):1337-1338. doi: 10.1177/00207640231178481. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
9
[Artificial intelligence in psychiatry: co-creation of human and ChatGPT].[精神病学中的人工智能:人类与ChatGPT的共同创造]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2023;65(4):241-243.
10
A Case Study Demonstrating Applications of ChatGPT in the Clinical Management of Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia.一个展示ChatGPT在难治性精神分裂症临床管理中的应用的案例研究。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 26;15(4):e38166. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38166. eCollection 2023 Apr.