Yaşar Nilay Çalikoğlu, Ünsal Gürkan, Kocaelli Hümeyra Arikan, Orhan Kaan, Sağ Fatma Beyza
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Microsc Res Tech. 2025 Jul;88(7):2073-2084. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24841. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
This study aims to compare the efficacy of locally applied Titanium-Platelet Rich Fibrin (T-PRF) and Leukocyte-Platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) in bone defect healing using micro-CT analysis and histopathological examinations in rabbit models. Eight healthy male New Zealand rabbits, aged 4-6 months, were utilized. Circular bicortical defects (6 mm diameter) were created at three areas in each rabbit. One of the defects was chosen as the control group, which received saline solution, while T-PRF and L-PRF were applied to the defect sites in separate experimental groups. Bone regeneration was analyzed using high-resolution micro-CT and histological evaluation post-sacrifice. Statistical analysis assessed the significance of observed differences. Micro-CT analysis revealed significant differences among the groups in bone volume, trabecular thickness, trabecular number, connectivity, and connectivity density (p < 0.05). Both T-PRF and L-PRF groups exhibited superior bone parameters compared to controls, with L-PRF showing higher values. Trabecular separation and bone surface area to bone volume ratio did not differ significantly among the groups (p > 0.05). Histological examination indicated advanced healing stages in the L-PRF group, suggesting both T-PRF and L-PRF contribute to bone regeneration, with L-PRF demonstrating better effects. The study concludes that while both T-PRF and L-PRF aid in bone regeneration, L-PRF shows superior efficacy. L-PRF is recommended for bone defect healing due to its better performance in enhancing bone parameters.
本研究旨在通过微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)分析和组织病理学检查,比较局部应用富钛血小板纤维蛋白(T-PRF)和富白细胞血小板纤维蛋白(L-PRF)对兔模型骨缺损愈合的疗效。选用8只4至6个月大的健康雄性新西兰兔。在每只兔子的三个部位制造圆形双皮质缺损(直径6毫米)。其中一个缺损作为对照组,接受生理盐水,而T-PRF和L-PRF分别应用于不同实验组的缺损部位。在处死动物后,使用高分辨率微计算机断层扫描和组织学评估分析骨再生情况。统计分析评估观察到的差异的显著性。微计算机断层扫描分析显示,各组在骨体积、小梁厚度、小梁数量、连通性和连通性密度方面存在显著差异(p<0.05)。与对照组相比,T-PRF组和L-PRF组的骨参数均表现更优,L-PRF组的值更高。各组之间的小梁间距和骨表面积与骨体积之比无显著差异(p>0.05)。组织学检查表明L-PRF组的愈合阶段更高级,这表明T-PRF和L-PRF均有助于骨再生,L-PRF的效果更好。该研究得出结论,虽然T-PRF和L-PRF都有助于骨再生,但L-PRF显示出更好的疗效。由于L-PRF在增强骨参数方面表现更好,因此推荐用于骨缺损愈合。