• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于关节炎研究的五种健康状况评估工具的比较测量效率和敏感性

Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research.

作者信息

Liang M H, Larson M G, Cullen K E, Schwartz J A

出版信息

Arthritis Rheum. 1985 May;28(5):542-7. doi: 10.1002/art.1780280513.

DOI:10.1002/art.1780280513
PMID:4004963
Abstract

Five health status instruments were administered in random order to 50 arthritis patients before and after total joint arthroplasty. Relative efficiency and sensitivity in measurement of change in pain, mobility and physical function, social role and social activity, and global health were assessed. The instruments had highly correlated scores, but had differences in certain dimensions. Inter-instrument differentials were larger for social and global outcomes than for pain or mobility. NO single instrument consistently outperformed the others. A method for determining relative efficiency is described.

摘要

对50名关节炎患者在全关节置换术前和术后以随机顺序使用了五种健康状况评估工具。评估了这些工具在测量疼痛、活动能力、身体功能、社会角色和社会活动以及整体健康状况变化方面的相对效率和敏感性。这些工具的得分高度相关,但在某些维度上存在差异。社会和整体结果方面的工具间差异大于疼痛或活动能力方面的差异。没有一种工具始终优于其他工具。描述了一种确定相对效率的方法。

相似文献

1
Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research.用于关节炎研究的五种健康状况评估工具的比较测量效率和敏感性
Arthritis Rheum. 1985 May;28(5):542-7. doi: 10.1002/art.1780280513.
2
Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments.短期与长期健康状况评估工具的比较测量敏感性
Med Care. 1992 Oct;30(10):917-25. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199210000-00004.
3
The problem of 'noise' in monitoring patient-based outcomes: generic, disease-specific and site-specific instruments for total hip replacement.监测基于患者的结局中的“噪声”问题:全髋关节置换的通用、疾病特异性和部位特异性工具。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Oct;1(4):224-31. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100408.
4
Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation.用于骨科评估的五种健康状况评估工具的比较。
Med Care. 1990 Jul;28(7):632-42. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199007000-00008.
5
Effectiveness of knee replacement surgery in arthritis.
Int J Nurs Stud. 1994 Feb;31(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(94)90006-x.
6
A comparison of two recently developed health status instruments for patients with arthritis: Dutch-AIMS2 and IRGL. Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Impact of Rheumatic diseases on General health and Lifestyle.两种最近开发的用于关节炎患者的健康状况评估工具的比较:荷兰版关节炎影响测量量表2(Dutch - AIMS2)和国际类风湿性关节炎生活质量量表(IRGL)。关节炎影响测量量表。风湿性疾病对总体健康和生活方式的影响。
Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Feb;37(2):157-64. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.2.157.
7
Predicting quality-of-life outcomes following total joint arthroplasty. Limitations of the SF-36 Health Status Questionnaire.预测全关节置换术后的生活质量结果。SF-36健康状况问卷的局限性。
J Arthroplasty. 1995 Dec;10(6):742-7. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80069-5.
8
Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures.将对变化的敏感性作为选择健康状况衡量指标的标准的重要性。
Qual Health Care. 1992 Jun;1(2):89-93. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.2.89.
9
Comparative outcomes of total joint arthroplasty.全关节置换术的比较结果。
J Arthroplasty. 1995 Dec;10(6):737-41. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80068-3.
10
Pain and function in patients after primary unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty.初次单髁和全膝关节置换术后患者的疼痛和功能。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Dec 15;92(18):2890-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00917.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the cancer-specific utility measure EORTC QLU-C10D using evidence from four lung cancer trials covering six country value sets.利用来自四项涵盖六个国家价值集的肺癌试验的证据,对癌症特异性效用测量指标EORTC QLU-C10D进行验证。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 28;15(1):14907. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83861-y.
2
Validation of the Cancer-Specific Preference-Based Measure EORTC QLU-C10D against the Generic Instruments EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in a Prospectively Collected Sample of Patients with Cancer in Austria and France.在奥地利和法国前瞻性收集的癌症患者样本中,基于癌症特异性偏好的测量指标EORTC QLU-C10D相对于通用工具EQ-5D-5L和SF-6Dv2的验证。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Apr 27. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01501-3.
3
Convergent and Known-Groups Validity and Sensitivity to Change of the Virtual Performance Measure in Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Longitudinal Study.
髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎患者虚拟性能测量的聚合效度、已知组效度及对变化的敏感性:纵向研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 28;9:e69001. doi: 10.2196/69001.
4
A comparison of measurement properties between EORTC QLU-C10D and FACT-8D in patients with hematological malignances.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷-10维度(EORTC QLU-C10D)与癌症治疗功能评价系统-8维度(FACT-8D)测量属性的比较
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Oct 1;14(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00560-0.
5
Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of four functional tests in community-dwelling older adults with high risk of falls.社区居住的高跌倒风险老年人四项功能测试的重测信度和最小可检测变化
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Jan 15;70(2):164-170. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.12725. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Sexual Self-Concept and Psychological Functioning of Women With a History of Childhood Sexual Abuse in Hong Kong.香港有童年性虐待史女性的性自我概念与心理功能
Int J Sex Health. 2022 Jan 7;34(2):177-196. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2021.2022819. eCollection 2022.
7
The EORTC QLU-C10D is a valid cancer-specific preference-based measure for cost-utility and health technology assessment in the Netherlands.EORTC QLU-C10D 是一种在荷兰具有成本效用和卫生技术评估有效性的癌症特异性偏好测量工具。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Dec;25(9):1539-1555. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01670-6. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
8
Loneliness in older primary care patients and its relationship to physical and mental health-related quality of life.老年初级保健患者的孤独感及其与身心健康相关生活质量的关系。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Mar;72(3):811-821. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18762. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
9
Relationship between health-related quality of life, depression, and anxiety in older primary care patients and their family members.老年初级保健患者及其家庭成员的健康相关生活质量、抑郁和焦虑之间的关系。
Aging Ment Health. 2024 Jun;28(6):910-916. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2285499. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
10
Scale agreement, ceiling and floor effects, construct validity, and relative efficiency of the PROPr and EQ-5D-3L in low back pain patients.PROPr 和 EQ-5D-3L 在腰痛患者中的效标关联度、天花板效应和地板效应、结构效度及相对效率。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Sep 27;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02188-w.