Evers A W, Taal E, Kraaimaat F W, Jacobs J W, Abdel-Nasser A, Rasker J J, Bijlsma J W
Department of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Feb;37(2):157-64. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.2.157.
Two multidimensional health status instruments of rheumatic diseases, the Dutch-AIMS2 and the IRGL (Impact of Rheumatic diseases on General health and Lifestyle), were compared in a sample of 284 rheumatoid arthritis patients with regard to their measurement properties and usefulness for research purposes. Both questionnaires showed an excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha), and were highly comparable with regard to their construct and convergent validity. Second-order factor analysis confirmed the physical, psychological and social health dimensions for both questionnaires. The comparability between the instruments was established by high intercorrelations between the physical and psychological health dimensions. Sufficient convergent validity was indicated by the strong correlations between the physical functioning scales and clinical and laboratory measures. The main differences between both questionnaires relate to their length and emphasis on health aspects. The Dutch-AIMS2 is characterized by a more extensive assessment of the physical dimension and the additional measurement of general health aspects. The shorter IRGL exclusively assesses the main health dimensions with a more comprehensive measurement of the psychological and social dimensions. The instrument that reflects the subject in question most adequately should be chosen.
在284名类风湿关节炎患者样本中,对两种风湿性疾病的多维健康状况评估工具——荷兰AIMS2和IRGL(风湿性疾病对总体健康和生活方式的影响)进行了比较,考察它们的测量特性及对研究目的的实用性。两份问卷均显示出极佳的信度(克朗巴哈系数),在结构效度和收敛效度方面具有高度可比性。二阶因子分析证实了两份问卷的生理、心理和社会健康维度。通过生理和心理健康维度之间的高度相互关联确定了两种工具之间的可比性。生理功能量表与临床及实验室测量之间的强相关性表明具有足够的收敛效度。两份问卷的主要差异在于长度和对健康方面的侧重点。荷兰AIMS2的特点是对生理维度进行更广泛的评估,并额外测量总体健康方面。较短的IRGL仅评估主要健康维度,对心理和社会维度进行更全面的测量。应选择最能充分反映相关主题的工具。