• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可弯曲可导航的输尿管吸引接入鞘(FANS)是否比传统鞘更安全、更高效?意大利多中心经验。

Is flexible navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) safer and more efficient than conventional sheaths? Italian multicentric experience.

作者信息

Cacciatore Loris, Minore Antonio, Bonanno Lilla, Contessa Pierangelo, Esperto Francesco, Iannello Antonio Rosario, Papalia Rocco

机构信息

Department of Urology, Fondazione Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Department of Urology, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi, Piemonte Hospital, Bonino Pulejo, Messina, Italy.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2025 Mar 6;43(1):153. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05520-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-025-05520-9
PMID:40050461
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) with continuous flow lithotripsy may improve stone-free rates (SFR) in ureterorenolithotripsy procedures, reducing operative time and the need for fragment extraction. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of FANS versus conventional sheaths in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones.

METHODS

From January to September 2024, patients undergoing RIRS with high-power pulsed lasers (60 W Ho:YAG or 100 W pTm:YAG) were randomized to receive either a conventional sheath (Group 1) or FANS (Group 2). Data on baseline characteristics, operative details, and complications were collected. SFR, defined as the absence of fragments > 3 mm, was assessed with non-contrast CT scans one-month post-surgery. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were enrolled (70 with conventional sheath, 62 with FANS). The FANS group had shorter operative times (55.25 vs. 61.36 min, p = 0.028), while laser time was similar between groups. Postoperative complications were lower in the FANS group. At one month, the FANS group had a higher SFR (95% vs. 67%, p < 0.005) and fewer re-interventions (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

FANS significantly improves SFR without increasing postoperative complications postoperative complications or negatively affecting recovery, offering a promising alternative to conventional sheaths in ureterorenolithotripsy procedures. FANS improves kidney stone surgery outcomes, providing better stone removal, fewer complications, and faster recovery compared to the standard tool.

摘要

背景与目的

具有连续冲洗功能的可弯曲、可导航的输尿管鞘(FANS)与连续流碎石术相结合,可能会提高输尿管肾镜碎石术的结石清除率(SFR),减少手术时间以及碎片取出的需求。本研究旨在比较FANS与传统鞘在接受逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石患者中的安全性和有效性。

方法

2024年1月至9月,接受高功率脉冲激光(60W钬激光或100W倍频Nd:YAG激光)RIRS的患者被随机分为接受传统鞘组(第1组)或FANS组(第2组)。收集基线特征、手术细节和并发症的数据。结石清除率定义为术后1个月非增强CT扫描显示无>3mm的碎片,以此评估结石清除率。设定统计学显著性为p<0.05。

结果

共纳入132例患者(70例使用传统鞘,62例使用FANS)。FANS组手术时间较短(55.25分钟对61.36分钟,p=0.028),而两组激光照射时间相似。FANS组术后并发症较少。术后1个月,FANS组结石清除率更高(95%对67%,p<0.005),再次干预更少(p=0.02)。

结论

FANS显著提高结石清除率,且不增加术后并发症或对恢复产生负面影响,在输尿管肾镜碎石术中是传统鞘的一个有前景的替代方案。与标准工具相比,FANS改善了肾结石手术的结果,结石清除效果更好,并发症更少,恢复更快。

相似文献

1
Is flexible navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) safer and more efficient than conventional sheaths? Italian multicentric experience.可弯曲可导航的输尿管吸引接入鞘(FANS)是否比传统鞘更安全、更高效?意大利多中心经验。
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 6;43(1):153. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05520-9.
2
Is the ablation stone efficacy and efficiency better with a flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath?使用可弯曲且可导航的输尿管吸引鞘进行结石消融的效果和效率会更好吗?
World J Urol. 2025 Apr 9;43(1):219. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05610-8.
3
Multicenter outcome analysis of different sheath sizes for Flexible and Navigable Suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) ureteroscopy: an EAU Endourology collaboration with the global FANS study group.多中心不同鞘径的 Flexi 和 Navi 输尿管软镜取石术(FANS)用可弯曲输尿管导引鞘应用效果分析:EAU 腔内泌尿外科学会与全球 FANS 研究组的合作研究
Urolithiasis. 2024 Nov 15;52(1):162. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01662-4.
4
Comparing Thulium Fiber Versus High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Combined with the Flexible and Navigable Suction Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis by the Global FANS Collaborative Group.全球FANS协作组对铥激光与高功率钬激光碎石术联合可弯曲可导航吸引通道鞘在输尿管软镜治疗肾结石中的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Endourol. 2025 Jan;39(1):42-49. doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0653. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
5
General anaesthesia with gated or controlled mechanical ventilation and its influence on peri and post operative outcomes of retrograde intra renal surgery when using flexible and navigable suction access sheath, an EAU-endourology and Global FANS collaborative study group: a prospective study.门控或控制机械通气的全身麻醉及其对使用可弯曲和可导航吸引接入鞘进行逆行肾内手术围手术期和术后结果的影响,欧洲泌尿外科学会-腔内泌尿外科和全球FANS协作研究组:一项前瞻性研究
World J Urol. 2025 Feb 8;43(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05488-6.
6
Does intraoperative surgeon reported stone free status (IO-SFS) correlate with CT based post operative stone free status (PO-SFS) in flexible ureteroscopy using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) in real-world practice? A prospective global FANS collaborative study group initiative with the section of EAU endourology.在实际临床实践中,使用可弯曲且可导航的输尿管吸引鞘(FANS)进行输尿管软镜检查时,术者报告的术中结石清除状态(IO-SFS)与基于CT的术后结石清除状态(PO-SFS)是否相关?一项由欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)腔内泌尿外科分会发起的全球FANS前瞻性合作研究。
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 21;43(1):184. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05570-z.
7
Comparison of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath with conventional ureteral access sheath for pediatric retrograde intrarenal surgery: a single-center propensity-matched analysis.柔性可导航输尿管接入鞘与传统输尿管接入鞘在小儿逆行性肾内手术中的比较:单中心倾向匹配分析
Urolithiasis. 2024 Dec 31;53(1):17. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01686-w.
8
The utility of flexible and navigable suction access sheath (FANS) in patients undergoing same session flexible ureteroscopy for bilateral renal calculi: a global prospective multicenter analysis by EAU endourology.可弯曲导航式抽吸接入鞘(FANS)在双侧肾结石同期行可弯曲输尿管镜检查患者中的应用:欧洲泌尿外科学会腔内泌尿外科全球前瞻性多中心分析
World J Urol. 2025 Feb 28;43(1):142. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05477-9.
9
Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Thulium Fiber vs Pulsed Thulium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser Lithotripsy in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease Using a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath: Results From a Prospective, Multicenter Study of the EAU Section of Endourology.使用可弯曲导航吸引输尿管鞘的钬光纤与脉冲钬:钇铝石榴石激光碎石术在软性输尿管镜治疗肾结石疾病中的倾向评分匹配分析:欧洲泌尿外科学会内镜泌尿学部前瞻性多中心研究结果
Urology. 2025 May;199:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2025.01.065. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
10
Flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional ureteral access sheath for flexible ureteroscopy in renal and proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety.用于肾及输尿管上段结石软性输尿管镜检查的可弯曲可导航吸引输尿管鞘与传统输尿管鞘的比较:疗效和安全性的荟萃分析
BMC Urol. 2025 May 19;25(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01817-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial clinical experience with 6.3 Fr single‑use flexible ureteroscope versus 8.5 Fr in retrograde intrarenal surgery with flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath of variable diameters: a single‑center comparative study.6.3 Fr一次性使用软性输尿管镜与8.5 Fr软性输尿管镜在逆行肾内手术中联合不同直径可弯曲且可导航的吸引输尿管鞘的初步临床经验:一项单中心比较研究
World J Urol. 2025 Sep 15;43(1):556. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05940-7.
2
A comparative study of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath combined with single-use flexible ureteroscopes and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of kidney stones > 2.5 cm: a single-center retrospective study.可弯曲可导航输尿管吸引鞘联合一次性可弯曲输尿管镜与经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径>2.5 cm肾结石的对比研究:一项单中心回顾性研究
BMC Urol. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01930-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective Evaluation of Ureteral Wall Thickness as a Means to Predict Spontaneous Stone Passage: Is It Beneficial?输尿管壁厚度作为预测结石自然排出手段的前瞻性评估:是否有益?
J Endourol. 2024 Dec 13. doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0462.
2
Analysis of the effectiveness and safety of 7.5 Fr ultra-thin flexible ureteroscope combined with a tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath for the treatment of kidney stones.7.5 Fr超薄软性输尿管镜联合头端可弯曲的输尿管吸引鞘治疗肾结石的有效性和安全性分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Mar;57(3):817-823. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04269-1. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
3
Optimal deflection techniques for flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS): a comparative in vitro PEARLS analysis.
Efficacy and safety of the flexible negative-pressure ureteral sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.可弯曲负压输尿管鞘在逆行性肾内手术中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2025 Aug 5;12:1649574. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1649574. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparative efficacy and safety of flexible and navigable suction sheath versus non-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.可弯曲可导航吸引鞘与不可弯曲吸引输尿管通路鞘在肾结石逆行肾内手术中的疗效与安全性比较:一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究
World J Urol. 2025 Aug 12;43(1):486. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05863-3.
5
In vitro suction comparison of 3 flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS) of 2 sizes using a 7.5Fr single-use flexible ureteroscope: an AUSET-EAU endourology collaboration.使用7.5Fr一次性软性输尿管镜对两种尺寸的3种可弯曲可操控性输尿管鞘(FANS)进行体外抽吸比较:一项AUSET-EAU腔内泌尿外科协作研究。
World J Urol. 2025 Jul 11;43(1):426. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05812-0.
6
Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones comparing non suction conventional UAS vs flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths in a multicenter real-world experience. Is it finally time to bury the no suction ureteral access sheath? An EAU endourology analysis.多中心真实世界经验中,比较非抽吸传统输尿管镜鞘与可弯曲及可导航抽吸输尿管镜鞘在肾结石治疗中的应用。是时候淘汰非抽吸输尿管镜鞘了吗?一项欧洲泌尿外科学会腔内泌尿外科分析。
World J Urol. 2025 Jun 25;43(1):390. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05748-5.
7
Outcomes of the Surgical Stone Management in Pelvic Ectopic Kidneys: A Retrospective Comparison of Three Different Approaches.盆腔异位肾手术结石处理的结果:三种不同方法的回顾性比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 19;14(6):2081. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062081.
优化灵活可弯曲输尿管取石鞘(FANS)的弯曲角度技术:一项体外比较 PEARLS 分析。
World J Urol. 2024 Oct 30;42(1):606. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05297-3.
4
Urinary Tract Infection Predictors in Patients Undergoing Retrograde IntraRenal Surgery for Renal Stones: Does the Instrument Make the Difference?接受逆行性肾内手术治疗肾结石患者的尿路感染预测因素:器械会产生影响吗?
J Clin Med. 2024 May 8;13(10):2758. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102758.
5
Scoping Review of Experimental and Clinical Evidence and Its Influence on Development of the Suction Ureteral Access Sheath.经皮肾镜输尿管鞘的实验与临床证据综述及其对其发展的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 16;14(10):1034. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14101034.
6
Efficacy of Aspiration-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath (ClearPETRA) in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.抽吸辅助输尿管通路鞘(ClearPETRA)在逆行性肾内手术中的疗效
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 May;34(5):420-424. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0076. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
7
2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Ureteroscopy and ureterorenoscopy.2022 年 AFU 结石委员会推荐意见:输尿管镜检查和输尿管软镜检查。
Prog Urol. 2023 Nov;33(14):843-853. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2023.08.016.
8
Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi.传统与新型尖端可弯曲抽吸式输尿管导引鞘联合软性输尿管镜治疗单侧肾结石的比较。
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3619-3627. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
9
Indications, preferences, global practice patterns and outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones in adults: results from a multicenter database of 6669 patients of the global FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR).成人肾结石逆行肾内手术(RIRS)的适应症、偏好、全球实践模式及结果:来自全球灵活输尿管镜检查结果登记处(FLEXOR)6669例患者的多中心数据库结果
World J Urol. 2023 Feb;41(2):567-574. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04257-z. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
10
The use of 14/16Fr ureter access sheath for safe and effective management of large upper ureteral calculi.使用14/16Fr输尿管接入鞘安全有效地处理上段输尿管大结石。
World J Urol. 2022 May;40(5):1217-1222. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03949-w. Epub 2022 Feb 12.