• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜取石术中俯卧位与俯卧屈曲位的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Prone versus prone-flexed position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Taha Diaa-Eldin, Ibrahim Ali, Zeid Ahmed, Shokry Eslam, Abdelbaky Tarek, Nabeeh Hossam

机构信息

Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt.

出版信息

Urol Ann. 2025 Jan-Mar;17(1):32-37. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_36_24. Epub 2025 Jan 18.

DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_36_24
PMID:40051992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11881952/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study intends to assess prone and flexed prone positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for safety and efficacy.

METHODS

From May 2017 to August 2022, a stratified randomized approach was carried out to randomly assign 346 PNL candidates into prone or flexed prone groups. Perioperative data, such as stone-free rate, stay length, operative time, and complication rates, were studied.

RESULTS

In the prone and flexed prone groups, the mean ages of 51.7 ± 12.2 and 49.4 ± 11.9 min, respectively ( = 0.1). The mean body mass indexes of 24.2 ± 13.4 and 29.9 ± 11.9, respectively ( = 0.03). The pyelocaliceal perforation occurred in 15 (8%) and 11 (6.4%) participants, respectively. In the prone and flexed prone postures, postoperative bleeding occurred in 15 (7.9%) and 9 (5.4%) patients, respectively ( = 1.0). The average percentage decrease in hemoglobin concentration was 1.29 ± 0.42 and 1.21 ± 0.32, respectively ( < 0.000). The success rates were 92 and 93.6%, respectively ( = 0.6). The average access length was 3.9 ± 1.2 and 4.8 ± 1.8 min ( = 0.08), whereas the average operation duration was 68.7 ± 37.4 and 50.4 ± 21.9 min ( = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Both the prone and prone-flexed positions are equally safe for PNL. The flexed prone position is more likely to be beneficial for obese patients. The prone-flexed position enabled a somewhat shorter average operation time. The pelvicalyceal system could be more readily reached when the prone position was flexed.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)中俯卧位和屈膝俯卧位的安全性和有效性。

方法

2017年5月至2022年8月,采用分层随机方法将346例PNL候选患者随机分为俯卧位组或屈膝俯卧位组。研究围手术期数据,如结石清除率、住院时间、手术时间和并发症发生率。

结果

在俯卧位组和屈膝俯卧位组中,平均年龄分别为51.7±12.2岁和49.4±11.9岁(P=0.1)。平均体重指数分别为24.2±13.4和29.9±11.9(P=0.03)。肾盂肾盏穿孔分别发生在15例(8%)和11例(6.4%)参与者中。在俯卧位和屈膝俯卧位姿势下,术后出血分别发生在15例(7.9%)和9例(5.4%)患者中(P=1.0)。血红蛋白浓度平均下降百分比分别为1.29±0.42和1.21±0.32(P<0.000)。成功率分别为92%和93.6%(P=0.6)。平均穿刺通道建立时间分别为3.9±1.2分钟和4.8±1.8分钟(P=0.08),而平均手术时间分别为68.7±37.4分钟和50.4±21.9分钟(P=0.04)。

结论

俯卧位和屈膝俯卧位在PNL中同样安全。屈膝俯卧位对肥胖患者可能更有益。屈膝俯卧位使平均手术时间有所缩短。屈膝俯卧位时肾盂肾盏系统更容易到达。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b0b/11881952/4716e9606552/UA-17-32-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b0b/11881952/6354d9997934/UA-17-32-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b0b/11881952/4716e9606552/UA-17-32-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b0b/11881952/6354d9997934/UA-17-32-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b0b/11881952/4716e9606552/UA-17-32-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Prone versus prone-flexed position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomized controlled trial.经皮肾镜取石术中俯卧位与俯卧屈曲位的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Urol Ann. 2025 Jan-Mar;17(1):32-37. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_36_24. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
2
Comparative Study of Prone Position Variations for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术俯卧位变化的比较研究
Res Rep Urol. 2023 Jun 23;15:233-241. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S415426. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparison of supine and prone positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of staghorn stones.仰卧位与俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形结石的比较。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):603-608. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0977-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
4
Comparison of supracostal versus infracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the novel prone-flexed patient position.比较采用新型俯卧屈膝位的经肋上和肋下入路经皮肾镜取石术。
J Endourol. 2011 Jun;25(6):947-54. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0705. Epub 2011 May 20.
5
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidney: comparing ultrasound-guided access in flank position with conventional fluoroscopic-guided in prone position.经皮肾镜取石术在马蹄肾中的应用:比较侧卧位超声引导与传统俯卧位透视引导。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Dec;50(6):773-778. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01368-5. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
6
Beyond prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comprehensive review.经皮肾镜取石术中俯卧位之外的体位:全面综述
Eur Urol. 2008 Dec;54(6):1262-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.012. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
7
Comparison of supine and prone miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of lower pole, middle pole and renal pelvic stones: A matched pair analysis.对比仰卧位与俯卧位微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾下盏、肾中盏及肾盂结石: 配对分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Sep-Oct;45(5):956-964. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0049.
8
The use of supine PNL technique for a tubeless procedure and shorter hospital stay: A comparison of supine and prone PNL procedures in 361 cases.采用平卧位经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)行无管化操作和缩短住院时间:361 例平卧位与俯卧位 PNL 术的比较。
Arch Esp Urol. 2021 Nov;74(9):867-874.
9
Comparative Study of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine and Prone Positions.仰卧位与俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术的对比研究。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2021 Apr 23;19(1):154-157. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v19i1.3346.
10
Split-leg modified lateral versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized trial.经皮肾镜取石术中分腿改良侧卧位与俯卧位的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
World J Urol. 2021 Apr;39(4):1247-1256. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03285-x. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
How Accurate Are We in Estimating True Stone Volume? A Comparison of Water Displacement, Ellipsoid Formula, and a CT-Based Software Tool.我们在估算真实结石体积方面的准确性如何?一种水置换法、椭圆公式和基于 CT 的软件工具的比较。
J Endourol. 2018 Jun;32(6):572-576. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0937. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
2
Optimizing Prone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Identifying the Vertebral Level Correlating With the Largest Left Ventricle Cross-Sectional Area via Computed Tomography Scan.优化俯卧位心肺复苏:通过计算机断层扫描确定与最大左心室横截面积相关的椎体水平。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):520-523. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001369.
3
EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.
EAU 指南:尿石症的介入治疗
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
4
Complications associated with prone positioning in elective spinal surgery.择期脊柱手术中俯卧位相关并发症。
World J Orthop. 2015 Apr 18;6(3):351-9. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i3.351.
5
Measuring stone volume - three-dimensional software reconstruction or an ellipsoid algebra formula?测量结石体积——三维软件重建还是椭圆体公式?
BJU Int. 2014 Apr;113(4):610-4. doi: 10.1111/bju.12456. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
6
Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: con.仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:续
Urol J. 2011 Fall;8(4):265-8.
7
Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study.俯卧位与截石位行经皮肾镜取石术:来自泌尿内镜协会经皮肾镜取石术全球研究临床研究办公室的报告。
J Endourol. 2011 Oct;25(10):1619-25. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0110. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
8
Effect of position and weight force on inferior vena cava diameter--implications for arrest-related death.体位和体重对下腔静脉直径的影响——对相关死亡的影响。
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Oct 10;212(1-3):256-9. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
9
The debate over percutaneous nephrolithotomy positioning: a comprehensive review.经皮肾镜取石术体位的争议:全面综述。
J Urol. 2011 Jul;186(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2693. Epub 2011 May 14.
10
Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis.仰卧位与俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:荟萃分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Mar;43(1):67-77. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9801-0. Epub 2010 Jul 14.