Leewiboonsilp Thun, Jianpinijnan Chuleepon, Thokanit Nintita Sripaiboonkij, Pattaranutaporn Poompis, Ngamphaiboon Nuttapong
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Cancer Med. 2025 Mar;14(5):e70746. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70746.
The benefit of postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) over radiotherapy (RT) alone remains unclear for resected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) patients with intermediate risk(s) such as pT3 or pT4 primary, pN2 or pN3 nodal disease, nodal disease in levels IV or V, perineural invasion (PNI), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). This study aims to evaluate the benefits of postoperative CRT in patients with multiple intermediate risks.
LA-HNSCC patients who underwent curative surgery with intermediate risk at our institution were identified. A propensity score-matched (PSM) method was performed using treatment, sex, age, AJCC staging, LVI, and PNI as covariates.
A total of 162 eligible patients were identified. After PSM, 48 patients were classified into CRT and RT groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics and treatment were well balanced. In the CRT group, most patients received cisplatin-CRT (67%). Patients with 1, 2, and ≥ 3 intermediate risk factors exhibited significantly different event-free survival (EFS) (7.2 vs. 3.8 vs. 1.9 years; p = 0.007), with a trend towards differences in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.068). The median OS of the postoperative RT and CRT groups was not significantly different (4.5 vs. 5.0 years; p = 0.950). Similarly, the median EFS was not significantly different (p = 0.634). No EFS and OS benefits were demonstrated in patients with ≥ 2 intermediate risk factors treated with CRT compared to RT alone.
In our PSM study, LA-HNSCC patients with intermediate risk(s) did not benefit from postoperative CRT compared to RT alone. Although patients with multiple intermediate risks had significantly worse survivals, postoperative CRT did not improve OS and EFS. The results of this study may support avoiding unnecessary acute and late toxicity associated with adding chemotherapy to postoperative RT in patients with intermediate risk(s).
对于具有中等风险(如pT3或pT4原发灶、pN2或pN3淋巴结转移、IV或V区淋巴结转移、神经周围浸润(PNI)和淋巴管浸润(LVI))的局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LA-HNSCC)切除患者,术后同步放化疗(CRT)相对于单纯放疗(RT)的获益仍不明确。本研究旨在评估术后CRT对具有多种中等风险患者的益处。
确定在我们机构接受了具有中等风险的根治性手术的LA-HNSCC患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)方法,将治疗、性别、年龄、美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期、LVI和PNI作为协变量。
共确定了162例符合条件的患者。PSM后,分别有48例患者被分为CRT组和RT组。基线特征和治疗情况得到了很好的平衡。在CRT组中,大多数患者接受顺铂-CRT(67%)。具有1个、2个和≥3个中等风险因素的患者的无事件生存期(EFS)有显著差异(7.2年对3.8年对1.9年;p = 0.007),总生存期(OS)有差异趋势(p = 0.068)。术后RT组和CRT组的中位OS无显著差异(4.5年对5.0年;p = 0.950)。同样,中位EFS也无显著差异(p = 0.634)。与单纯RT相比,接受CRT治疗的≥2个中等风险因素的患者未显示出EFS和OS获益。
在我们的PSM研究中,具有中等风险的LA-HNSCC患者与单纯RT相比,未从术后CRT中获益。尽管具有多种中等风险的患者生存期明显较差,但术后CRT并未改善OS和EFS。本研究结果可能支持避免在具有中等风险的患者术后RT中添加化疗所带来的不必要的急性和晚期毒性。