Edgren Johanna, Häsä Jokke, Aaltonen Mari
Department of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Data Management of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 8;25(1):929. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22032-8.
There is a lack of consistent evidence on the effects of the COVID-19 lockdown among older long-term care facility (LTCF) residents. We utilised a versatile and comprehensive register-based data to assess the impact of the lockdown and to explore what kinds of individual-level factors were associated with changes in functioning and wellbeing of the older LTCF residents during the lockdown in 2020.
This retrospective register-based cohort study (n = 7 260) with a 6-month follow-up utilised Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) data combined with data on confirmed COVID-19 infections and death records of LTCF residents aged 65-year-old and older. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to detect cohort effects on health stability, cognitive performance, coping with activities of daily living (ADL), and social engagement. Additional subgroup analyses were performed to explore the effect among the oldest (85 years old and older), most severely cognitively impaired individuals (dementia diagnosis and Cognitive Performance Scale score 4-6), and those who experienced the lowest social engagement (Social Engagement Scale score 0-1) at baseline.
When all the RAI assessed LTCF residents were included in the analyses, belonging to the lockdown cohort was not observably associated with a decline in health stability, cognitive performance, coping with ADL, or social engagement. According to the subgroup analyses, the health stability of the oldest residents and the cognition of the most severely cognitively impaired residents deteriorated more in the lockdown than in the comparison cohort.
The COVID-19 lockdown was not observably associated with deterioration in health, cognitive or ADL functioning, or social engagement among Finnish LTCF residents. However, subgroup analyses suggested that the effects of the lockdown were the most detrimental among the most severely cognitively impaired and the oldest residents. The vulnerability between different subgroups should be considered more closely in exceptional circumstances due to infectious diseases in the future and provide deliberately older people the opportunity to experience the physical closeness of their loved ones despite possible infections.
关于新冠疫情封锁措施对老年长期护理机构(LTCF)居民的影响,目前缺乏一致的证据。我们利用了一个通用且全面的基于登记册的数据,以评估封锁措施的影响,并探讨在2020年封锁期间,哪些个体层面的因素与老年LTCF居民的功能和健康状况变化相关。
这项基于登记册的回顾性队列研究(n = 7260),随访期为6个月,使用了居民评估工具(RAI)数据,并结合了65岁及以上LTCF居民的新冠确诊感染数据和死亡记录。进行逻辑回归分析,以检测队列对健康稳定性、认知表现、日常生活活动能力(ADL)应对能力和社交参与度的影响。还进行了额外的亚组分析,以探讨在年龄最大(85岁及以上)、认知障碍最严重的个体(痴呆症诊断且认知表现量表得分4 - 6)以及基线时社交参与度最低(社交参与量表得分0 - 1)的人群中的影响。
当将所有RAI评估的LTCF居民纳入分析时,属于封锁队列与健康稳定性、认知表现、ADL应对能力或社交参与度的下降没有明显关联。根据亚组分析,年龄最大的居民的健康稳定性和认知障碍最严重的居民的认知能力在封锁期间比对照组恶化得更多。
新冠疫情封锁措施与芬兰LTCF居民的健康、认知或ADL功能以及社交参与度的恶化没有明显关联。然而,亚组分析表明,封锁措施对认知障碍最严重和年龄最大的居民影响最为不利。未来在因传染病等特殊情况下,应更密切地考虑不同亚组之间的脆弱性,并为老年人提供机会,使其能在可能感染的情况下仍能与亲人有身体上的亲近接触。