Gerontology Research Center and Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, PO Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Department of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Qual Life Res. 2022 Mar;31(3):713-722. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03002-0. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic reduced possibilities for activities of choice potentially threatening quality of life (QoL). We defined QoL resilience as maintaining high quality of life and studied whether walking speed, absence of loneliness, living arrangement, and stress-coping ability predict QoL resilience among older people.
Community-dwelling 75-, 80-, and 85-year-old persons (n = 685) were interviewed and examined in 2017-2018 and were followed up during COVID-19 social distancing in 2020. We assessed QoL using the OPQOL-brief scale and set a cut-off for 'constant high' based on staying in the highest baseline quartile over the follow-up and categorized all others as having 'low/moderate'. Perceived restrictiveness of the social distancing recommendations was examined with one item and was categorized as 'yes' or 'no' restrictiveness.
Better stress-coping ability (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.14-1.28) and not being lonely (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.48-4.63) increased the odds for constant high QoL from before to amid social distancing, and the odds did not differ according to the perceived restrictiveness of the social distancing recommendations. Higher walking speed predicted constant high QoL only among those perceiving restrictiveness (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.27). Living arrangement did not predict constant high QoL.
During social distancing, psychosocial resources helped to maintain good QoL regardless how restrictive the social distancing recommendations were perceived to be. Better physical capacity was important for constant high QoL only among those perceiving restrictiveness presumably because it enabled replacing blocked activities with open outdoor physical activities.
COVID-19 大流行期间的社交距离限制了选择活动的可能性,这可能会威胁到生活质量(QoL)。我们将 QoL 弹性定义为维持高质量的生活,并研究了老年人的步行速度、无孤独感、居住安排和应对压力的能力是否可以预测 QoL 弹性。
2017-2018 年对 75、80 和 85 岁的社区居民(n=685)进行访谈和检查,并在 2020 年 COVID-19 社交距离限制期间进行随访。我们使用 OPQOL-brief 量表评估 QoL,并根据随访期间保持最高基线四分位数的情况设定“始终高”的截止值,并将所有其他情况归类为“低/中度”。使用一个项目评估对社交距离限制建议的感知限制程度,并将其归类为“是”或“否”限制。
更好的应对压力的能力(OR 1.21,95%CI 1.14-1.28)和不孤独(OR 2.67,95%CI 1.48-4.63)增加了从社交距离之前到社交距离期间始终保持高 QoL 的几率,而且这种几率与对社交距离限制建议的感知限制程度无关。较高的步行速度仅在那些感知到限制的人群中预测始终保持高 QoL(OR 1.16,95%CI 1.07-1.27)。居住安排并不能预测始终保持高 QoL。
在社交距离期间,心理社会资源有助于维持良好的 QoL,无论对社交距离限制建议的感知限制程度如何。更好的身体能力对于那些感知到限制的人来说,对于始终保持高 QoL 很重要,因为它可以通过进行户外开放的身体活动来替代受阻的活动。