• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰腺癌。通过临床表现评估预后。

Pancreatic cancer. Assessment of prognosis by clinical presentation.

作者信息

Kalser M H, Barkin J, MacIntyre J M

出版信息

Cancer. 1985 Jul 15;56(2):397-402. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850715)56:2<397::aid-cncr2820560232>3.0.co;2-i.

DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19850715)56:2<397::aid-cncr2820560232>3.0.co;2-i
PMID:4005804
Abstract

Three hundred ninety-three patients who were entered into pancreatic carcinoma treatment protocols of the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG) were analyzed as to significant differences in clinical presentation and factors influencing survival. Patients were grouped according to the stage of the disease. Group I (21 cases) included those patients who had a potentially curative resection. Group II (182 cases) patients had a locally unresectable tumor less then 400 cm2 (surgically proven) and no distant metastases, and Group III (190 cases) had advanced disease. Group I patients had the smallest lesions (median area, 9 cm2), located in head of the gland in 90% and painless jaundice was the most frequent clinical presentation (52%). In Group II, 83% were located in the head of the gland but the median area was much larger (36 cm2). Pain was present in 80% of cases, and jaundice in 62% with 48% having jaundice and pain. In Group III patients, lesions of body and tail were over four-fold as frequent as in Group I and almost three-fold greater than in Group II. The median area of the lesion was large (30 cm2). Pain was present in 85% and jaundice in only 31%. Median survival in Group I patients was longer than Group III (73 versus 10 weeks; P less than 0.001). Ambulatory status, sex, race, abdominal pain, and histologic type influenced survival in one or more groups whereas age, jaundice, location of the tumor, degree of cellular differentiation, back pain, and nutritional status did not influence survival in any group. In all groups, those with a good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0 and 1) survived longer than those with poor status (ECOG 2 and 3; P less than 0.05). The best potential prognosis is in those who are fully productive and present with painless jaundice, and who have resection of the tumor.

摘要

对393例纳入胃肠道肿瘤研究组(GITSG)胰腺癌治疗方案的患者,分析其临床表现的显著差异及影响生存的因素。患者按疾病分期分组。第一组(21例)包括那些有可能进行根治性切除的患者。第二组(182例)患者有局部不可切除的肿瘤,面积小于400平方厘米(经手术证实)且无远处转移,第三组(190例)有晚期疾病。第一组患者的病变最小(中位面积9平方厘米),90%位于胰头,最常见的临床表现是无痛性黄疸(52%)。在第二组中,83%位于胰头,但中位面积大得多(36平方厘米)。80%的病例有疼痛,62%有黄疸,48%既有黄疸又有疼痛。在第三组患者中,体部和尾部病变的发生率是第一组的四倍多,几乎是第二组的三倍。病变的中位面积较大(30平方厘米)。85%有疼痛,仅有31%有黄疸。第一组患者的中位生存期长于第三组(73周对10周;P<0.001)。活动状态、性别、种族、腹痛和组织学类型在一个或多个组中影响生存,而年龄、黄疸、肿瘤位置、细胞分化程度、背痛和营养状况在任何组中均不影响生存。在所有组中,体能状态良好(东部肿瘤协作组[ECOG]0和1)的患者比体能状态差(ECOG 2和3)的患者生存期长(P<0.05)。最佳的潜在预后见于那些功能完全正常、表现为无痛性黄疸且肿瘤已切除的患者。

相似文献

1
Pancreatic cancer. Assessment of prognosis by clinical presentation.胰腺癌。通过临床表现评估预后。
Cancer. 1985 Jul 15;56(2):397-402. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850715)56:2<397::aid-cncr2820560232>3.0.co;2-i.
2
Pancreatic head carcinoma: clinical analysis of 189 cases.胰头癌:189例临床分析
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2009 Feb;8(1):79-84.
3
Survival results and prognostic factors in T4 N0-3 non-small cell lung cancer patients according to the AJCC 7th edition staging system.根据美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第7版分期系统,T4 N0-3期非小细胞肺癌患者的生存结果及预后因素
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(6):2465-72. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.6.2465.
4
[Value of combined therapy in pancreatic cancer with a poor prognosis: analysis of 233 clinical cases].[联合治疗在预后不良胰腺癌中的价值:233例临床病例分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Sep 15;89(34):2381-5.
5
Exocrine Pancreatic carcinoma in Tunisia: A retrospective study about 158 cases.突尼斯的外分泌型胰腺癌:一项关于158例病例的回顾性研究。
Tunis Med. 2015 Feb;93(2):73-5.
6
Follow-up after curative surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: asymptomatic recurrence is associated with improved survival.胰导管腺癌根治性手术后的随访:无症状复发与生存改善相关。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;39(6):559-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
7
Prognostic factors in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: analysis of actual 5-year survivors.切除的胰腺腺癌的预后因素:对实际5年生存者的分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 May;198(5):722-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.01.008.
8
Comparative study between uncinate process carcinoma and pancreatic head carcinoma after pancreaticodudenectomy (clincopathological features and surgical outcomes).胰十二指肠切除术后钩突癌与胰头癌的对比研究(临床病理特征与手术结果)
Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Sep;61(134):1748-55.
9
CEA and CA-19.9 serum tumor markers as prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis.癌胚抗原(CEA)和糖类抗原19.9(CA-19.9)血清肿瘤标志物作为局部晚期(不可切除)或转移性胰腺腺癌患者的预后因素:一项回顾性分析
J Chemother. 2009 Dec;21(6):673-80. doi: 10.1179/joc.2009.21.6.673.
10
Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in Elderly Patients over 75 Years of Age: A Retrospective Series of 129 Patients.75岁以上老年胰腺癌患者的治疗:129例回顾性系列病例
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2016 Mar;47(1):15-9. doi: 10.1007/s12029-015-9774-4.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative analysis and survival analysis of open versus minimally invasive radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放性与微创根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰腺癌的比较分析和生存分析:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 23;14:1513520. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1513520. eCollection 2024.
2
Excess pancreatic cancer risk due to smoking and modifying effect of quitting smoking: The Multiethnic Cohort Study.吸烟导致的胰腺癌额外风险及戒烟的改善作用:多民族队列研究
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Mar;35(3):541-548. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01811-x. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
3
Deep learning-based assessment of CT markers of sarcopenia and myosteatosis for outcome assessment in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment.
深度学习评估高强度聚焦超声治疗后晚期胰腺癌患者 CT 肌减少症和肌脂减少症标志物对结局的评估。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jan;34(1):279-286. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09974-6. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
4
Improved Therapeutic Delivery Targeting Clinically Relevant Orthotopic Human Pancreatic Tumors Engrafted in Immunocompromised Pigs Using Ultrasound-Induced Cavitation: A Pilot Study.使用超声诱导空化作用靶向移植于免疫缺陷猪体内的临床相关原位人胰腺肿瘤的治疗递送改善:一项初步研究。
Pharmaceutics. 2023 May 24;15(6):1585. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15061585.
5
A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis of Pre-Diagnostic Blood Plasma Biomarkers for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer.用于胰腺癌早期检测的预诊断血浆生物标志物的横断面和纵向分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 26;23(21):12969. doi: 10.3390/ijms232112969.
6
The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Cancer.内镜超声检查在胰腺癌诊断及分期中的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;14(6):1373. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061373.
7
A ligand-receptor interactome platform for discovery of pain mechanisms and therapeutic targets.配体-受体相互作用组平台,用于发现疼痛机制和治疗靶点。
Sci Signal. 2021 Mar 16;14(674):eabe1648. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.abe1648.
8
Prognostic value of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Prognostic Score in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.纪念斯隆凯特琳预后评分在转移性胰腺腺癌中的预后价值。
Cancer. 2021 May 15;127(10):1568-1575. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33420. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
9
Factors affecting survival in operated pancreatic cancer: Does tumor localization have a significant effect on treatment outcomes?影响接受手术的胰腺癌患者生存的因素:肿瘤定位对治疗结果有显著影响吗?
North Clin Istanb. 2020 Sep 24;7(5):487-493. doi: 10.14744/nci.2020.09735. eCollection 2020.
10
Comparison of minimal invasive versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single center retrospective study.微创与开放根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)治疗胰腺导管腺癌的比较:一项单中心回顾性研究
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3763-3773. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07938-1. Epub 2020 Oct 8.