• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中小学生中同伴保护与社会地位之间的双向关系

Bidirectional Relationships Between Peer Defending and Social Status in Elementary and High School Students.

作者信息

Hines Cameron, Spadafora Natalie, Lambe Laura, Craig Wendy

机构信息

Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Brock University, Catharines, Canada.

出版信息

Aggress Behav. 2025 Mar;51(2):e70024. doi: 10.1002/ab.70024.

DOI:10.1002/ab.70024
PMID:40059413
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11891401/
Abstract

This study evaluated the bidirectional associations between peer defending and social status (perceived popularity and likability) as well as gender and grade differences in these associations. Cross-lagged panel models were used to assess these longitudinal relationships in a sample comprised of elementary school students (Grades 5-8, N = 301, M = 12.38, collected in May and November 2019) and high school students (Grades 9-12, N = 296, M = 15.69, collected in November 2022 and May 2023) collected from five schools in southern Ontario, Canada. Findings revealed that overall, popularity and likability predicted future peer defending, and students who defended others became more liked over time. Additionally, our exploratory analyses indicated that boys in elementary school who defended became more popular overtime. These findings extend previous investigations into the bidirectional associations between social status and peer defending, while considering the impacts of gender and cohort. Implications of these findings are discussed in terms of their novelty and considerations for bullying prevention programs.

摘要

本研究评估了同伴捍卫与社会地位(感知到的受欢迎程度和亲和力)之间的双向关联,以及这些关联中的性别和年级差异。交叉滞后面板模型用于评估这些纵向关系,样本包括来自加拿大安大略省南部五所学校的小学生(5 - 8年级,N = 301,平均年龄12.38岁,于2019年5月和11月收集)和高中生(9 - 12年级,N = 296,平均年龄15.69岁,于2022年11月和2023年5月收集)。研究结果显示,总体而言,受欢迎程度和亲和力可预测未来的同伴捍卫行为,且随着时间推移,为他人辩护的学生变得更受欢迎。此外,我们的探索性分析表明,小学阶段为他人辩护的男孩随着时间推移变得更受欢迎。这些发现扩展了先前对社会地位与同伴捍卫之间双向关联的研究,同时考虑了性别和群体的影响。将根据这些发现的新颖性以及对预防欺凌项目的考量来讨论其意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6829/11891401/9c7692081662/AB-51-e70024-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6829/11891401/1a046e515279/AB-51-e70024-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6829/11891401/fb48f156773c/AB-51-e70024-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6829/11891401/9c7692081662/AB-51-e70024-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6829/11891401/1a046e515279/AB-51-e70024-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6829/11891401/fb48f156773c/AB-51-e70024-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6829/11891401/9c7692081662/AB-51-e70024-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Bidirectional Relationships Between Peer Defending and Social Status in Elementary and High School Students.中小学生中同伴保护与社会地位之间的双向关系
Aggress Behav. 2025 Mar;51(2):e70024. doi: 10.1002/ab.70024.
2
Defending victims: What does it take to intervene in bullying and how is it rewarded by peers?保护受害者:干预欺凌行为需要什么,又会得到同伴怎样的回报?
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Dec;65:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Disability, poverty, and other risk factors associated with involvement in bullying behaviors.残疾、贫困和其他与欺凌行为相关的风险因素。
J Sch Psychol. 2020 Feb;78:115-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
4
Do classroom relationships moderate the association between peer defending in school bullying and social-emotional adjustment?课堂关系是否调节了同伴在学校欺凌中辩护与社会情感适应之间的关系?
J Sch Psychol. 2024 Aug;105:101315. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101315. Epub 2024 May 8.
5
Does defending affect adolescents' peer status, or vice versa? Testing the moderating effects of empathy, gender, and anti-bullying norms.保护是否会影响青少年的同伴地位,或者反之亦然?测试同理心、性别和反欺凌规范的调节作用。
J Res Adolesc. 2023 Sep;33(3):913-930. doi: 10.1111/jora.12847. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
6
Behind bullying and defending: same-sex and other-sex relations and their associations with acceptance and rejection.在欺凌和辩护背后:同性和异性关系及其与接纳和拒绝的关联。
Aggress Behav. 2013 Nov-Dec;39(6):462-71. doi: 10.1002/ab.21495. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
7
Being Popular and Being Liked: Goals, Behaviors, and Norm Salience.受欢迎与被喜欢:目标、行为与规范显著性
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 May;54(5):1238-1249. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02129-w. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
8
Main and moderated effects of moral cognition and status on bullying and defending.道德认知和地位对欺凌和保护的主要影响和调节作用。
Aggress Behav. 2012 Nov-Dec;38(6):456-68. doi: 10.1002/ab.21447. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
9
Defending Victims of Bullying in Early Adolescence: A Multilevel Analysis.保护青少年早期受欺凌者:多层次分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1926-1937. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0869-7. Epub 2018 May 29.
10
Does defending come with a cost? Examining the psychosocial correlates of defending behaviour among bystanders of bullying in a Canadian sample.捍卫行为是否需要付出代价?在加拿大样本中,考察了欺凌行为旁观者的社会心理因素与捍卫行为的相关性。
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Mar;65:112-123. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Does defending affect adolescents' peer status, or vice versa? Testing the moderating effects of empathy, gender, and anti-bullying norms.保护是否会影响青少年的同伴地位,或者反之亦然?测试同理心、性别和反欺凌规范的调节作用。
J Res Adolesc. 2023 Sep;33(3):913-930. doi: 10.1111/jora.12847. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
2
The Role of Aggressive Peer Norms in Elementary School Children's Perceptions of Classroom Peer Climate and School Adjustment.攻击性同伴规范在小学生对课堂同伴氛围和学校适应的感知中的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Aug;50(8):1582-1600. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01432-0. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
3
Peer defending as a multidimensional behavior: Development and validation of the Defending Behaviors Scale.
同伴防御作为一种多维行为:防御行为量表的编制与验证
J Sch Psychol. 2020 Feb;78:38-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.12.001. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
4
Differences in adolescents' motivations for indirect, direct, and hybrid peer defending.青少年间接、直接和混合式同伴防御动机的差异。
Soc Dev. 2019 May;28(2):414-429. doi: 10.1111/sode.12348. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
5
Defending behavior of peer victimization in school and cyber context during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of individual and peer-relational characteristics.儿童和青少年时期在学校和网络环境中同伴侵害的防御行为:个体和同伴关系特征的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Sep;145(9):891-928. doi: 10.1037/bul0000205. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
6
Longitudinal Associations Between Adolescents' Bullying-Related Indirect Defending, Outsider Behavior, and Peer-Group Status.青少年与欺凌相关的间接防御、局外行为和同伴群体地位的纵向关联。
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Jan;30 Suppl 1:87-99. doi: 10.1111/jora.12450. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
7
Mapping a continuum of adolescent helping and bystander behavior within the context of dating violence and bullying.在恋爱暴力和欺凌的背景下描绘青少年援助和旁观者行为的连续体。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2018;88(3):335-345. doi: 10.1037/ort0000245. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
8
Defending victimized peers: Opposing the bully, supporting the victim, or both?为受欺负的同龄人辩护:对抗欺负者、支持受害者,还是两者兼顾?
Aggress Behav. 2016 Nov;42(6):585-597. doi: 10.1002/ab.21653. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
9
What can we do about exploratory analyses in clinical trials?对于临床试验中的探索性分析,我们能做些什么?
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt B):302-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
10
The evolution of magnanimity : When is it better to give than to receive?宽容的演变:何时给予比接受更好?
Hum Nat. 1998 Mar;9(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s12110-998-1009-y.