• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年与欺凌相关的间接防御、局外行为和同伴群体地位的纵向关联。

Longitudinal Associations Between Adolescents' Bullying-Related Indirect Defending, Outsider Behavior, and Peer-Group Status.

机构信息

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

Utrecht University.

出版信息

J Res Adolesc. 2020 Jan;30 Suppl 1:87-99. doi: 10.1111/jora.12450. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1111/jora.12450
PMID:30156740
Abstract

During adolescence, youth become more likely to avoid involvement in witnessed bullying and less likely to support victims. It is unknown whether-and how-these bystander behaviors (i.e., outsider behavior and indirect defending) are associated with adolescents' peer-group status (i.e., popularity and social acceptance) over time. Cross-lagged path modeling was used to examine these longitudinal associations in a sample of 313 Dutch adolescents (M  = 10.3 years). The results showed that status longitudinally predicted behavior, rather than that behavior predicted status. Specifically, unpopularity predicted outsider behavior and social acceptance predicted indirect defending. These findings suggest that a positive peer-group status can trigger adolescents' provictim stance. However, adolescents may also strategically avoid involvement in witnessed bullying to keep a low social profile.

摘要

在青少年时期,青少年更有可能避免卷入目击到的欺凌事件,也不太可能支持受害者。目前尚不清楚这些旁观者行为(即局外人行为和间接保护)是否以及如何随着时间的推移与青少年的同伴群体地位(即受欢迎程度和社会接纳度)相关。交叉滞后路径模型用于在 313 名荷兰青少年(M=10.3 岁)样本中检验这些纵向关联。结果表明,地位会随着时间的推移预测行为,而不是行为预测地位。具体来说,不受欢迎程度预测局外人行为,而社会接纳度预测间接保护。这些发现表明,积极的同伴群体地位可以引发青少年的支持受害者立场。然而,青少年也可能出于策略考虑而避免卷入目击到的欺凌事件,以保持低调的社会形象。

相似文献

1
Longitudinal Associations Between Adolescents' Bullying-Related Indirect Defending, Outsider Behavior, and Peer-Group Status.青少年与欺凌相关的间接防御、局外行为和同伴群体地位的纵向关联。
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Jan;30 Suppl 1:87-99. doi: 10.1111/jora.12450. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
2
The Silver Lining in the Dark Cloud of Social Status Insecurity: The Mediating Role of Popularity Goals in the Association Between Social Status Insecurity and Chinese Adolescents' Bullying Bystander Behaviors.社会地位不安全感的乌云中的一线希望:受欢迎目标在社会地位不安全感与中国青少年欺凌旁观者行为之间的中介作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP15851-NP15873. doi: 10.1177/08862605211023489. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
3
Defending Victims of Bullying in Early Adolescence: A Multilevel Analysis.保护青少年早期受欺凌者:多层次分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1926-1937. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0869-7. Epub 2018 May 29.
4
Disability, poverty, and other risk factors associated with involvement in bullying behaviors.残疾、贫困和其他与欺凌行为相关的风险因素。
J Sch Psychol. 2020 Feb;78:115-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
5
"They Think that I Should Defend": Effects of Peer and Teacher Injunctive Norms on Defending Victimized Classmates in Early Adolescents.“他们认为我应该站出来”:同伴和教师规范对青少年早期维护受欺凌同学的影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Nov;47(11):2424-2439. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0918-2. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
6
HEXACO personality correlates of adolescents' involvement in bullying situations.青少年卷入欺凌情境的 HEXACO 人格相关因素。
Aggress Behav. 2021 May;47(3):320-331. doi: 10.1002/ab.21947. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
7
Adolescent non-suicidal self-injury and its relationships with school bullying and peer rejection.青少年非自杀性自伤及其与校园欺凌和同伴拒绝的关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Apr;274:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.02.018. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
8
Participant Roles in Bullying Among Dutch Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorders.自闭症谱系障碍荷兰青少年欺凌行为中的参与者角色。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018 Nov-Dec;47(6):874-887. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1138411. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
9
Bullying participant roles and gender as predictors of bystander intervention.将霸凌参与者角色和性别作为旁观者干预行为的预测因素。
Aggress Behav. 2017 May;43(3):281-290. doi: 10.1002/ab.21688. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
10
Defending behavior of peer victimization in school and cyber context during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of individual and peer-relational characteristics.儿童和青少年时期在学校和网络环境中同伴侵害的防御行为:个体和同伴关系特征的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Sep;145(9):891-928. doi: 10.1037/bul0000205. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer Interdependence in Bullying Victimization, Self-Compassion, and Moral Disengagement: A Dyadic Analysis of Early Adolescents.欺凌受害、自我同情和道德脱离中的同伴相互依赖:对青少年早期的二元分析
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02238-0.
2
Bidirectional Relationships Between Peer Defending and Social Status in Elementary and High School Students.中小学生中同伴保护与社会地位之间的双向关系
Aggress Behav. 2025 Mar;51(2):e70024. doi: 10.1002/ab.70024.
3
The Longitudinal Effect of Peer-Nominated Popularity on Defending Behaviors in Chinese Adolescents: The Moderating Role of Manipulative Traits, Desired Popularity, and Gender.
同伴提名受欢迎度对中国青少年防御行为的纵向影响:操纵特质、期望受欢迎度和性别调节作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Mar;53(3):581-594. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01927-y. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
4
Clique Hierarchy Moderates the Association between Social Preference and Defending Behaviors in Early Adolescence: The Role of Gender Differences.社会偏好与青少年早期防御行为的关系受群体层次结构的调节:性别差异的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Nov;52(11):2285-2299. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01825-3. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
5
Parental support and bullying bystander behaviors in Chinese adolescents: Longitudinal mediation through social harmony.父母支持与中国青少年的欺凌旁观者行为:通过社会和谐的纵向中介作用
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;11:994658. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.994658. eCollection 2023.
6
Bullying Prevention in Adolescence: Solutions and New Challenges from the Past Decade.青少年欺凌预防:过去十年的解决方案和新挑战。
J Res Adolesc. 2021 Dec;31(4):1023-1046. doi: 10.1111/jora.12688.
7
HEXACO personality correlates of adolescents' involvement in bullying situations.青少年卷入欺凌情境的 HEXACO 人格相关因素。
Aggress Behav. 2021 May;47(3):320-331. doi: 10.1002/ab.21947. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
8
Differences in adolescents' motivations for indirect, direct, and hybrid peer defending.青少年间接、直接和混合式同伴防御动机的差异。
Soc Dev. 2019 May;28(2):414-429. doi: 10.1111/sode.12348. Epub 2018 Nov 27.