Arumugam Surender, Mathew Sebeena, Vishwanath Sankar, Ravichandran Santhiya, Kumaravadivel Karthick, Thangavel Boopathi
Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, KSR Institute of Dental Science and Research, Tiruchengode, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 5;17(2):e78587. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78587. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Objective Proper seal achieved via placement of an effective intraorifice barrier curtails the occurrence of post-bleaching consequences and reinforces the cervical tooth structure. Hence, our present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of three different light-cure biomaterials as an intraorifice barrier. Methodology Forty-eight sound human premolars were obtained, and root canal treatment procedures were accomplished according to the standard protocol. Gutta-percha was removed from the cementoenamel junction to a uniform depth of 3 mm, and the barrier materials were placed according to the respective groups (n=16 each): Group I: resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (Ionoseal, VOCO, Innovative Biotherapies, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States), Group II: TheraCal LC (Bisco, Inc., Schaumburg, Illinois, United States), and Group III: bulk-fill composite (BFC) (Tetric N-Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc., Schaan, Liechtenstein). Eight samples from each group were coated with nail varnish, submerged in 2% methylene blue for 24 hours, and evaluated for sealing ability using ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometry. The remaining eight samples from each group were subjected to push-out bond strength evaluation using the universal testing machine. Values were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Scheffe's t-test. Result TheraCal LC showed the highest mean value of sealing ability to other groups; however, there is an insignificant difference compared with BFC. Push-out bond strength values are increasing, with Group II being the lowest, followed by Group I and the BFC group demonstrating superior performance. Conclusion TheraCal LC exhibited the least microleakage among the experimental groups. Yet BFC stands out to be a reliable material of choice owing to its superior strength and fairly acceptable sealing ability.
目的 通过放置有效的口内屏障实现适当的封闭,可减少漂白后并发症的发生,并增强牙颈部牙体结构。因此,我们目前的研究旨在评估三种不同的光固化生物材料作为口内屏障的有效性。方法 获取48颗健康人前磨牙,按照标准方案完成根管治疗程序。将牙胶从牙骨质釉质界去除至统一深度3mm,并根据各自的组(每组n = 16)放置屏障材料:第一组:树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)(Ionoseal,VOCO,创新生物疗法公司,美国密歇根州安阿伯),第二组:TheraCal LC(Bisco公司,美国伊利诺伊州绍姆堡),第三组:大块充填复合树脂(BFC)(Tetric N-Ceram,义获嘉伟瓦登特公司,列支敦士登公国沙恩)。每组的8个样本涂指甲油,浸入2%亚甲蓝中24小时,并使用紫外可见(UV-Vis)分光光度法评估封闭能力。每组剩余的8个样本使用万能试验机进行推出粘结强度评估。使用单向方差分析和谢费t检验对数值进行统计分析。结果 TheraCal LC显示出与其他组相比最高的平均封闭能力值;然而,与BFC相比差异不显著。推出粘结强度值在增加,第二组最低,其次是第一组,BFC组表现出优异性能。结论 TheraCal LC在实验组中表现出最小的微渗漏。然而,由于其优异的强度和相当可接受的封闭能力,BFC是一种可靠的选择材料。