Swansea Bay University Health Board, Restorative Dental Department, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, SA6 6NL, UK.
Br Dent J. 2020 Mar;228(5):333-337. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-1317-0.
Internal bleaching is an effective and minimally invasive way of bleaching non-vital teeth. A commonly cited risk associated with it is external cervical resorption (ECR), which is a potentially significant complication that could result in loss of the tooth. This is an important point of discussion with a patient during the consent process. Legally, patients are required to be made aware of material risks to which they would be likely to attach significance, such as the loss of a tooth. The risk of ECR is therefore a key component in the patient's decision-making process as they weigh it against the perceived benefits. Over the last ten years, both clinical and legal reasons have resulted in a number of changes in the materials and protocols used for internal bleaching. This leads to the question of what the current quality of evidence is regarding the association of ECR following internal bleaching with modern protocols. Other restorative options for discoloured teeth, such as veneers or crowns, involve the irreversible removal of tooth tissue and these may be chosen by patients over internal bleaching based on out-of-date evidence.
内漂白是一种有效且微创的非活髓牙齿漂白方法。与之相关的一个常被提及的风险是外颈部吸收(ECR),这是一种潜在的严重并发症,可能导致牙齿丧失。在同意过程中,这是与患者讨论的一个重要问题。从法律上讲,必须让患者了解他们可能会重视的重大材料风险,例如牙齿丧失。因此,ECR 的风险是患者决策过程中的一个关键因素,因为他们要权衡其与预期收益的关系。在过去的十年中,临床和法律原因都导致内漂白使用的材料和方案发生了一些变化。这就引出了一个问题,即在现代方案中,内漂白后 ECR 的发生与当前证据的质量如何。其他用于变色牙齿的修复选择,如贴面或牙冠,涉及到牙体组织的不可逆去除,而这些可能会基于过时的证据而被患者选择而不是内漂白。