• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转诊患者与直接前往急诊科就诊的坏死性筋膜炎患者的结局比较。

A comparison of outcomes between transferred patients versus patients who presented directly to the emergency department with necrotizing fasciitis.

作者信息

Neeki Michael M, Dong Fanglong, Tran Louis, Malkoc Aldin, Kim Joseph, Neeki Sarah C, Patel Suraj, Senewiratne Niluk Leon, Ma Mariel, Wong Cynthis, Borger Rodney, Wong David

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, 400 N. Pepper Ave, Colton, CA, 92324, USA.

Department of Surgery, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 10;18(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00848-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12245-025-00848-w
PMID:40065239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11892193/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Necrotizing Fasciitis (NF) is a rare life-threatening bacterial infection that necessitates emergent resuscitation and operative intervention. Most of the literature has emphasized the need for early surgical intervention. This is problematic for patients being treated at a facility lacking surgical support, with concerns for increasing mortality and morbidity rates.

METHODS

This is a 10-year retrospective study of emergency department (ED) documentation and surgical operative reports of patients seen at Arrowhead Regional Medical Center from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: the Transfer Group (TG), consisting of those transferred from another facility, and the Direct Admit Group (DAG), comprising those who presented directly to the ED. A comparison was conducted to identify statistically significant differences between the 2 groups of patients with a final diagnosis of NF, with specific emphasis on mortality rate, hospital length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of NF were included in the final analysis. More than half (50.8%, n = 68) of the patients presented as transfers from area hospitals. Compared to the DAG, the TG had a significantly higher percentage of patients undergoing surgical intervention within six hours of ED presentation (95.6% vs. 10.6%, respectively; p < 0.0001). The TG had a lower mortality rate compared to the DAG (11.8% vs. 22.7%), though the difference did not reach statistical significance. There was no statistically significant difference in hospital LOS (13 days vs. 13.5 days, p = 0.9046) or ICU LOS (3 days for both groups, p = 0.4845) between these two groups.

CONCLUSION

Aggressive management with broad-spectrum antibiotics and intravenous fluid resuscitation may mitigate the effect on mortality in patients with necrotizing fasciitis when prompt surgical intervention is not available.

摘要

引言

坏死性筋膜炎(NF)是一种罕见的危及生命的细菌感染,需要紧急复苏和手术干预。大多数文献都强调了早期手术干预的必要性。对于在缺乏手术支持的机构接受治疗的患者来说,这存在问题,因为人们担心死亡率和发病率会增加。

方法

这是一项对2011年1月1日至2020年12月31日在箭头区域医疗中心就诊的患者的急诊科(ED)记录和手术报告进行的为期10年的回顾性研究。患者分为两组:转院组(TG),由从其他机构转来的患者组成;直接入院组(DAG),由直接到急诊科就诊的患者组成。对两组最终诊断为NF的患者进行比较,以确定统计学上的显著差异,特别关注死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间。

结果

共有134例确诊为NF的患者纳入最终分析。超过一半(50.8%,n = 68)的患者是从地区医院转来的。与直接入院组相比,转院组在急诊科就诊后6小时内接受手术干预的患者比例显著更高(分别为95.6%和10.6%;p < 0.0001)。转院组的死亡率低于直接入院组(11.8%对22.7%),尽管差异未达到统计学显著性。两组之间的住院时间(13天对13.5天,p = 0.9046)或重症监护病房住院时间(两组均为3天,p = 0.4845)没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

当无法及时进行手术干预时,使用广谱抗生素和静脉液体复苏进行积极治疗可能会减轻坏死性筋膜炎患者的死亡率。

相似文献

1
A comparison of outcomes between transferred patients versus patients who presented directly to the emergency department with necrotizing fasciitis.转诊患者与直接前往急诊科就诊的坏死性筋膜炎患者的结局比较。
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 10;18(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00848-w.
2
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Cellulitis Requiring Intensive Care.需要重症监护的蜂窝织炎患者的临床特征与预后
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Jun 1;153(6):578-582. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0159.
3
Evaluation of Antibiotic Duration after Surgical Debridement of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection.坏死性软组织感染清创术后抗生素疗程评价。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022 May;23(4):357-363. doi: 10.1089/sur.2021.256. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
4
Cervical Necrotizing Fasciitis, Diagnosis and Treatment of a Rare Life-Threatening Infection.颈部坏死性筋膜炎:一种罕见的危及生命感染的诊断与治疗
Ear Nose Throat J. 2023 Mar;102(3):NP109-NP113. doi: 10.1177/0145561321991341. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
5
Evaluating the Laboratory Risk Indicator to Differentiate Cellulitis from Necrotizing Fasciitis in the Emergency Department.评估实验室风险指标以在急诊科区分蜂窝织炎与坏死性筋膜炎
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;18(4):684-689. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.3.33607. Epub 2017 May 12.
6
Temporizing surgical management improves outcome in patients with Vibrio necrotizing fasciitis complicated with septic shock on admission.入院时即合并败血性休克的创伤弧菌坏死性筋膜炎患者,施行暂时手术处理可改善预后。
Burns. 2014 May;40(3):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
7
A case of necrotizing fasciitis initially misdiagnosed as cellulitis.一例最初被误诊为蜂窝织炎的坏死性筋膜炎病例。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024 May;118:109701. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109701. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
8
Necrotizing Fasciitis.坏死性筋膜炎
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 15;5(2):S1-S25. doi: 10.21980/J84M1D. eCollection 2020 Apr.
9
Time to diagnose and time to surgery in patients presenting with necrotizing fasciitis: a retrospective analysis.坏死性筋膜炎患者的诊断时间和手术时间:一项回顾性分析
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 18;51(1):140. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02816-8.
10
Prognostic factors for mortality in 123 severe cases of necrotizing fasciitis in 5 hospitals in the Netherlands between 2003 and 2017.2003 年至 2017 年荷兰 5 家医院 123 例坏死性筋膜炎严重病例的死亡率预测因素。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Apr;48(2):1189-1195. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01706-z. Epub 2021 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Executive Summary: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.执行摘要:拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):1974-1982. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005357.
2
Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection: Time is Crucial, and the Admitting Service Matters.坏死性软组织感染:时间至关重要,而收治科室也很重要。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Dec;21(10):828-833. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.262. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
3
Association Between State-Mandated Protocolized Sepsis Care and In-hospital Mortality Among Adults With Sepsis.州政府强制推行的脓毒症规范化治疗方案与成年脓毒症患者院内死亡率之间的关联。
JAMA. 2019 Jul 16;322(3):240-250. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9021.
4
Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections.坏死性软组织感染
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 7;377(23):2253-2265. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1600673.
5
Necrotizing Fasciitis: How Reliable are the Cutaneous Signs?坏死性筋膜炎:皮肤体征的可靠性如何?
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2017 Oct-Dec;10(4):205-210. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_42_17.
6
Evaluating the Laboratory Risk Indicator to Differentiate Cellulitis from Necrotizing Fasciitis in the Emergency Department.评估实验室风险指标以在急诊科区分蜂窝织炎与坏死性筋膜炎
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;18(4):684-689. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.3.33607. Epub 2017 May 12.
7
Early Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment for Necrotizing Fasciitis: A Multicenter Study.坏死性筋膜炎的早期诊断与外科治疗:一项多中心研究
Front Surg. 2017 Feb 7;4:5. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00005. eCollection 2017.
8
Early surgical intervention and its impact on patients presenting with necrotizing soft tissue infections: A single academic center experience.早期手术干预及其对坏死性软组织感染患者的影响:单学术中心经验
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2016 Jan-Mar;9(1):22-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.173868.
9
Current concepts in the management of necrotizing fasciitis.坏死性筋膜炎治疗的当前概念
Front Surg. 2014 Sep 29;1:36. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2014.00036. eCollection 2014.
10
A 3-year experience with necrotizing fasciitis: favorable outcomes despite operative delays in a busy acute care hospital.坏死性筋膜炎的3年经验:在繁忙的急症医院中,尽管手术延迟,但仍取得了良好的结果。
Am Surg. 2012 Oct;78(10):1059-62.