Homøe Anne-Sophie, Aanæs Kasper, Tidemandsen Jens Even, Holbaek Haase Christiane, Niclas Rubek, Badsberg Samuelsen Grethe, Holmegaard Larsen Bent Ivan, Backer Vibeke
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2025 Jul;15(7):724-733. doi: 10.1002/alr.23562. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) significantly impacts patients' quality of life (QoL). Standard treatments include nasal irrigations, nasal steroids, systemic corticosteroids, and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Uncontrolled severe CRSwNP treated with monoclonal antibodies (biologic drugs) gain better disease control, although some residual symptoms may persist. Combining biologic therapy with FESS could potentially reduce residual symptoms faster and for a longer period. Therefore, we aim to compare the effectiveness of combined FESS and biologic therapy against biologics alone in patients with severe CRSwNP.
This randomised controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 58 patients with CRSwNP and type 2 inflammation who were randomly assigned to FESS or non-FESS groups. All patients were treated with 100 mg of s.c. mepolizumab every 4 weeks for 6 months. Those in the FESS group underwent surgery 2 weeks after the first injection. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 6 months using the sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22), visual analog scale (VAS), nasal congestion score (NCS), and the smell identification test (16 sticks). Clinical evaluations were performed using rhinoscopy to identify nasal polyp scores (NPS).
Both treatment groups significantly improved in terms of their SNOT-22 scores after 6 months of treatment (p < 0.001). There were not significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.055). Patients with large NPS (6-8) improved significantly in terms of their SNOT-22 scores when they underwent combined treatment (FESS and mepolizumab) compared with s.c. mepolizumab alone (p < 0.05). They also exhibited improvements in ΔNPS (p < 0.001), VAS CRS (p = 0.074), and NCS reduction (p < 0.001) after undergoing combined treatment compared with those who had mepolizumab alone.
Patients with large polyp scores experienced significant improvements in their QoL (SNOT-22) and reduced NPS, NCS, and VAS CRS more when polyp burden was reduced with FESS in association with mepolizumab treatment compared to those treated with mepolizumab alone.
伴鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRSwNP)对患者的生活质量(QoL)有显著影响。标准治疗方法包括鼻腔冲洗、鼻用类固醇、全身用皮质类固醇以及功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术(FESS)。用单克隆抗体(生物药物)治疗未得到控制的重度CRSwNP能更好地控制病情,尽管可能仍会残留一些症状。将生物治疗与FESS相结合可能会更快且更持久地减轻残留症状。因此,我们旨在比较联合FESS和生物治疗与单纯生物治疗对重度CRSwNP患者的有效性。
这项随机对照试验(RCT)纳入了58例伴有2型炎症的CRSwNP患者,他们被随机分配到FESS组或非FESS组。所有患者每4周皮下注射100 mg美泊利单抗,共治疗6个月。FESS组的患者在首次注射后2周接受手术。在基线和6个月后,使用鼻窦结局测试-22(SNOT-22)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、鼻充血评分(NCS)和嗅觉识别测试(16支)对患者进行评估。使用鼻内镜检查来确定鼻息肉评分(NPS),以进行临床评估。
治疗6个月后,两个治疗组的SNOT-22评分均有显著改善(p < 0.001)。两组之间无显著差异(p = 0.055)。与单纯皮下注射美泊利单抗相比,NPS较大(6 - 8)的患者接受联合治疗(FESS和美泊利单抗)时,其SNOT-22评分有显著改善(p < 0.05)。与单纯接受美泊利单抗治疗的患者相比,他们在接受联合治疗后,ΔNPS(p < 0.001)、VAS CRS(p = 0.074)和NCS降低(p < 0.001)方面也有改善。
与单纯接受美泊利单抗治疗的患者相比,息肉评分较高的患者在接受FESS联合美泊利单抗治疗以减轻息肉负担时,其生活质量(SNOT-22)有显著改善,NPS、NCS和VAS CRS降低得更多。