Kidess Marc, Ivanova Troya, Hermans Julian, Stadelmeier Leo, Hoffmann Marina, Pyrgidis Nikolaos, Marcon Julian, Chaloupka Michael, Bauer Ricarda M, Stief Christian G, Volz Yannic
Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Urologie Maximilianstrasse, Munich, Germany.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Feb 21;74:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.02.004. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Urology is characterized by continuous innovation. The inception of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) marked a pivotal technological advance and further advances in digital treatment options for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are emerging. Our aim was to assess patient willingness to receive an electronic artificial urinary sphincter (eAUS) implant and identify associated concerns.
Patients who received a first AUS implant (AMS800 system) for post-RP SUI from March 2013 to December 2023 were included. An anonymous survey was used to collect data on demographics, current AUS satisfaction, daily technology use, interest in an eAUS, and concerns about potential eAUS technical malfunctions. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with significance set at < 0.05.
Out of 345 patients, 208 (60.2%) completed the questionnaire. The majority were aged 71-80 yr (51.7%) and had a university education (37.7%). Satisfaction with their AUS was high: 79.8% of the respondents were satisfied, 88.9% were satisfied with its handling, and 89.4% would choose an AUS implant again. Notably, 60.4% showed interest in an eAUS, with younger respondents and those who use technology on a daily basis expressing greater interest. Preferred control methods included remote-based (78.4%) and smartphone-based (60.0%) options. Concerns about system malfunction (66.4%), connection loss (65.9%), and battery issues (60.0%) were prevalent.
There was significant patient interest in an eAUS in our survey, especially among younger individuals and those who use technology daily. Despite high satisfaction with current AUS devices, addressing potential technical malfunctions and patient concerns is crucial for broader acceptance of an eAUS. Patient concerns about technological malfunctions seem to outweigh worries about medical issues.
Urology is becoming more advanced with technologies like robotic surgery and electronic artificial urinary sphincters (eAUS). According to our survey, most patients are happy with their current sphincters and are open to eAUS, especially younger patients who are familiar with technology. However, patients are concerned about system malfunctions and connection loss. More research is needed to address technical issues and patient concerns.
泌尿外科的特点是持续创新。机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的出现标志着一项关键的技术进步,并且压力性尿失禁(SUI)的数字治疗选择也在不断取得进一步进展。我们的目的是评估患者接受电子人工尿道括约肌(eAUS)植入的意愿,并确定相关的担忧因素。
纳入2013年3月至2023年12月期间因RP后SUI首次接受AUS植入(AMS800系统)的患者。采用匿名调查收集有关人口统计学、当前对AUS的满意度、日常技术使用情况、对eAUS的兴趣以及对潜在eAUS技术故障的担忧等数据。使用SPSS进行数据分析,显著性设定为<0.05。
345名患者中,208名(60.2%)完成了问卷。大多数患者年龄在71 - 80岁(51.7%),拥有大学学历(37.7%)。对其AUS的满意度较高:79.8%的受访者表示满意;88.9%对其操作感到满意;89.4%会再次选择AUS植入。值得注意的是,60.4%的患者对eAUS表现出兴趣,年轻受访者以及那些日常使用技术的人表现出更大的兴趣。首选的控制方法包括基于远程的(78.4%)和基于智能手机的(60.0%)选项。对系统故障(66.4%)、连接丢失(65.9%)和电池问题(60.0%)的担忧较为普遍。
在我们的调查中,患者对eAUS存在显著兴趣,尤其是在年轻个体和那些日常使用技术的人群中。尽管对当前的AUS设备满意度较高,但解决潜在的技术故障和患者担忧对于eAUS的更广泛接受至关重要。患者对技术故障的担忧似乎超过了对医疗问题的担忧。
随着机器人手术和电子人工尿道括约肌(eAUS)等技术的发展,泌尿外科正变得更加先进。根据我们的调查,大多数患者对他们目前的括约肌感到满意,并对eAUS持开放态度,尤其是熟悉技术的年轻患者。然而,患者担心系统故障和连接丢失。需要更多研究来解决技术问题和患者担忧。